1 / 22

European Real Estate Society (ERES) 2014

European Real Estate Society (ERES) 2014 21st Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25 th – 28 th. APPLICATION VALUE OF A PROCESS MODEL FOR SUPPORTING DECISION-MAKING IN PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT. Theme N: Real Estate Education Session: N-6.

aloha
Download Presentation

European Real Estate Society (ERES) 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. European Real Estate Society (ERES) 2014 21st Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th APPLICATION VALUE OF A PROCESS MODEL FOR SUPPORTING DECISION-MAKING IN PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT Theme N: Real Estate Education Session: N-6 Dr. Pieter C. le RouxLecturer, Corporate Real Estate ManagementFaculty of International Real Estate & Facility ManagementNHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences

  2. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Content Problem definition Concept development Concept pilots: 3-1. Academic year 2012 / 2013 3-2. Academic Year 2013 / 2014 Student evaluations Reflection

  3. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Problem definition 1-1. Context 1-2. Defining the problem • Track International Real Estate & Facility Management • 2nd year FM-students • Insufficient understanding: • Complex relationship between real estate and its use Problem ? Solution

  4. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Problem definition 1-1. Context 1-2. Defining the problem • Track International Real Estate & Facility Management • 2nd year FM-students • Insufficient understanding: • Complex relationship between real estate and its use Problem Solution

  5. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Problem definition 1-1. Context 1-2. Defining the problem • Track International Real Estate & Facility Management • 2nd year FM-students • Insufficient understanding: • Complex relationship between real estate and its use Problem n_1 n_2 X n_3 Solution n_4

  6. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Problem definition 1-3. Conceptual approach S • Create awareness of the process steps involved in: • Defining the problem • Determining the context • Identifying the desired solution • Understanding the interconnectedness of problem and solution • Formulate solutions for implementation n_1 n_2 n_3 n_4 P

  7. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Concept development 2-1. Accommodation-Choice model (AC-Model) • Process model: • Decision-making on organisational accommodation • d Voordt, T., van der, Ikiz-Koppejan, Y., Gosselink, A. (2011). “An organization-centered Accommodation Choice Model”, in Enhancing Building Performance (eds. Shauna Mallory-Hill, Wolfgang P. E. Preiser, Christopher G. Watson), pp. 213-222. 4 3 1 2

  8. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Concept development 2-1. Accommodation-Choice model (AC-Model) • Process model: • Decision-making on organisational accommodation • Translating goals and ambitions for/with new work environments to conceptual choices Voordt, T., van der, Ikiz-Koppejan, Y., Gosselink, A. (2011). “An organization-centered Accommodation Choice Model”, in Enhancing Building Performance (eds. Shauna Mallory-Hill, Wolfgang P. E. Preiser, Christopher G. Watson), pp. 213-222. 4 3 1 2

  9. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3. Concept pilots 2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014

  10. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3. Concept pilots 2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014 A B

  11. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-1. Pilot 1: Academic year 2012 / 2013 a) Student hand-out b) Research question How to improve overall employee-satisfaction with the new work environment? Generic question formulated in assignment hand-out All groups to apply evidence-based reasoning in researching the question Individual group interpretations of the generic question: Case-based approach

  12. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-1. Pilot 1: Academic year 2012 / 2013 c) Learning goals d) Plan of approach (PoA) Mandatory use of the AC-Model • Learn (how) to include the context of the commissioner • Apply professional research methods and techniques • Identify relevant facts, trends and developments in real estate • Formulate conclusions based on the outcomes of research and analysis • Translate research-output into executable recommendations • Transfer and apply knowledge decision-making processes based on the AC-Model

  13. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-1. Pilot 1: Academic year 2012 / 2013 e) Outcomes

  14. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-2. Pilot 2: Academic year 2013 / 2014 a) Student hand-out b) Research question How to increase the usability and performance of exciting real estate: transformation or optimisation? Generic question formulated in assignment hand-out All groups to apply evidence-based reasoning in researching the question Individual group interpretations of the generic question: Case-based approach A

  15. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-2. Pilot 2: Academic year 2013 / 2014 c) Learning goals d) Plan of approach (PoA) Recommended use of the AC-model • Learn (how) to include the context of the commissioner • Apply professional research methods and techniques • Identify relevant facts, trends and developments in real estate • Formulate conclusions based on the outcomes of research and analysis • Translate research-output into executable recommendations • Transfer and apply knowledge decision-making processes based on the AC-Model

  16. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 3-2. Pilot 2: Academic year 2013 / 2014 e) Outcomes

  17. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Student assessments 4-1. Assessment topics 2013 2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014 • Content of the theme: • Organisation of the theme: • AC-Model overall: • Ease of use, also for creating an overview • Applicability as structuring mechanism • Creating more transparent processes • Enables better decision-making • Facilitates better learning 4.09 4.42 4.14 4.75 7.67 8.25 ? ?

  18. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Student assessments 4-1. Assessment topics 2013 2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014 • Content of the theme: • Organisation of the theme: • AC-Model overall: • Ease of use, also for creating an overview • Applicability as structuring mechanism • Creating more transparent processes • Enables better decision-making • Facilitates better learning 4.09 4.42 4.14 4.75 7.67 8.25 ? ? AC-Model specifically appreciated for its added value in terms of: The process Communication

  19. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Reflection 5-1. Conclusions • Overall positive application value • Structured approach offered by the model is highly appreciated • High level of abstraction & complexity requires a more comprehensive introduction • Compulsory use appears to better facilitate a more qualitative learning experience

  20. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Reflection 5-1. Conclusions • Overall positive application value • Structured approach offered by the model is highly appreciated • High level of abstraction & complexity requires a more comprehensive introduction • Compulsory use appears to better facilitate a more qualitative learning experience Positive experience with the model results in repeated use!

  21. European Real Estate Society Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th, 2014 Reflection 5-1. Conclusions 5-2. Recommendations Continue with the use of this approach in structuring the theme Ensure the model is properly introduced and explained Structure both process and communication aspects according to the AC-Model Compulsory use should be replaced by full integration in the overall theme structure • Overall positive application value • Structured approach offered by the model is highly appreciated • High level of abstraction & complexity requires a more comprehensive introduction • Compulsory use appears to better facilitate a more qualitative learning experience • Positive experience with the model results in repeated use!

  22. European Real Estate Society (ERES) 2014 21st Annual Conference, Bucharest, Romania, June 25th – 28th Thank you Dr. Pieter C. le RouxLecturer, Corporate Real Estate ManagementRoux.P@nhtv.nl

More Related