550 likes | 737 Views
Minnesota Has Been Very Successful (Especially For A Cold Weather State at the End of the Road) . Our economic growth rate has exceeded the national averageOur population growth rate leads the frost beltWe rank with the leaders on many social and economic indicatorsEducation has been a key contributor to the state's success.
E N D
1. Minnesotas Economics & DemographicsLooking To 2030 & Beyond Tom Stinson, State Economist
Tom Gillaspy, State Demographer
July 2008
2. Minnesota Has Been Very Successful(Especially For A Cold Weather State at the End of the Road) Our economic growth rate has exceeded the national average
Our population growth rate leads the frost belt
We rank with the leaders on many social and economic indicators
Education has been a key contributor to the states success
3. Minnesotas Economy Has Changed Since the 1960s
4. Minnesotas Per Capita Personal Income Exceeds the U.S. Average by 6 Percent Minnesota ranked 14th in personal income per capita in 2006- - - In 1960 Minnesota ranked 25th
Personal income per capita grew at an average annual rate of 6.8 percent between 1960 and 2005
Since 1960 per capita personal income has grown faster in Minnesota than in most states outside the Southeast
5. Minnesotas GDP Growth Rate Exceeded the US Average, 1967-2007
6. Minnesota Private Industry Has Generally Matched National GrowthIndex Of Private Industry GDP
8. Payroll Employment Growth1972-2007
9. Payroll Employment in Minnesota Has Grown Faster than the US Average
10. Manufacturing Employment1972-2000
11. Minnesotas Unemployment Rate Has Been Well Below the US Average
12. Minnesota Per Capita Income Has Grown Faster Than The Nations
14. Minnesota Ranks Highly in Many Social/Economic Indicators 2nd percent of 16-64 employed (76.9%)
2nd cost of living adjusted per capita income (OK DOC)
8th lowest poverty rate
1st percent with health insurance 2004-06 ave
9th median family income in 2006
2nd Kids Count 2007
4th most livable state (Morgan Quinto Press)
4th lowest rate of disability among people age 16-64
1st with at least high school degree (90.7%)
12th with at least a bachelors degree
1st home ownership
2nd United Health Foundation ranking of state healthiness 2007
16. From 2004 to 2007 Minnesota Underperformed the US Averages Personal income growth
US 6.2% MN 4.4%
Per capita personal income growth
US 16.6% MN 13.5%
GDP growth
US 8.4% MN 4.8%
GDP per capita growth
US 5.4% MN 2.6%
17. Minnesota Payroll Employment Has Struggled Since Early 2006
18. Minnesotas Unemployment Rate Now Is Similar to the US Average
19. US Manufacturing Employment Fell Faster Than MN, 2000-2007
20. Minnesota Ranked 30th in Employment Growth, 2000-2007
21. Minnesota Ranked 24th in Real Per Capita GDP Growth, 2000-2007
22. Real Per Capita GDP Growth Compared to Neighboring States 2000-2007
23. Real Per Capita GDP Growth Compared to Midwestern States 2000-2007
24. Real Per Capita GDP Compared to High Tech States 2000-2007
28. Economic Fact of Life #1First Principle of Economic Growth Standard of Living depends on output per resident
Output = Output per Hour * Hours Worked
29. Four Mega-Forces Will Shape Minnesotas Economy
Globalization
Technology
Energy prices
Demography
30. The Three Big Demographic Trends Growth and suburbanization
Increased diversity
Aging
31. By 2020 Minnesota will add about ž Million People & 1/3 Million Households
33. Upper Midwest Becoming More Diverse But Still Less Than The Nation
34. In 2006, Minnesotas Foreign Born Workforce Was 240,000 or 8% Of The Total Workforce
35. From 2010 to 2020, Minnesota Will See Large Increases Age 50s and 60s We recalibrated our demographic forecasting model this year, updating it to the most recent data and found that people still age about 1 year every 12 months.
The updated forecasts tweaked the numbers a bit, but the basic trends are still there. Over the next decade, we will see a large increase in the number of people age 50 to 70 (the Boom Generation), declines in the number of people age 40-50 (Gen X), and declined in the number of people 15-24. The number of younger children and young adults age 25-35 (Gen Y) will increase We recalibrated our demographic forecasting model this year, updating it to the most recent data and found that people still age about 1 year every 12 months.
The updated forecasts tweaked the numbers a bit, but the basic trends are still there. Over the next decade, we will see a large increase in the number of people age 50 to 70 (the Boom Generation), declines in the number of people age 40-50 (Gen X), and declined in the number of people 15-24. The number of younger children and young adults age 25-35 (Gen Y) will increase
36. The Number of Workers Turning Age 62 Will Jump 30 Percent in 2008 The leading edge of the Boom generation just started turning 62 in the past couple weeks. AARP reports an increasing lines at Social Security offices and the retirement boom is about to begin. This is the year it beginsThe leading edge of the Boom generation just started turning 62 in the past couple weeks. AARP reports an increasing lines at Social Security offices and the retirement boom is about to begin. This is the year it begins
37. Childless Couples And 1-person Households Projected To Grow
38. Competition For The Future Workforce Will Increase
39. Labor Force Growth Is About To Slow Sharply
40. Migration Increases in Importance as Labor Force Growth Slows
41. The Three Most Important Factors For Future Economic Success Productivity
Productivity
Productivity
42. Economic Fact of Life #2 Productivity depends on
The stock of physical capital
The stock of human capital
Education
Health status
The stock of infrastructure
Advancements in technology Bakery Example
Physical capitalMore ovens increase the amount of bread that can be baked at any time.
More training for the bakers will increase the range and quality of the product. Instead of just slice bread, maybe now gourmet artisan breads.
Bread needs baked every day. Illness can disrupt the work flowan who wants bread from a sick baker anyway.
InfrastructureCongestion and poorly maintained roads slow delivery of the breadlate delivery can be disastrous in this business
Advancement in technologya new yeast can change the quality or the speed of rising of the bread. New machines (kneading, ovens, etc) can save labor.
Bakery Example
Physical capitalMore ovens increase the amount of bread that can be baked at any time.
More training for the bakers will increase the range and quality of the product. Instead of just slice bread, maybe now gourmet artisan breads.
Bread needs baked every day. Illness can disrupt the work flowan who wants bread from a sick baker anyway.
InfrastructureCongestion and poorly maintained roads slow delivery of the breadlate delivery can be disastrous in this business
Advancement in technologya new yeast can change the quality or the speed of rising of the bread. New machines (kneading, ovens, etc) can save labor.
43. Academic Research Is a Key Factor in State Economic Growth the lags between R&D and economic outcomes are quite long (at least years, and more likely decades)
The state
may do well for a while by drawing upon its existing stock of knowledge capital
How the state of Minnesota will fare in the future
will crucially depend on its recent and future investment in R&D
*Long Gone Lake Wobegone, Pardey, Dehmer and Beddow, 2007
44. R&D Spending Slowed in the Early 90sWe Are No Longer Above Average
46. Education Is The Key To Productivity Minnesota High School Graduation Ratio
48. Minnesotas Population Will ChangeThe Three Largest Cost Drivers In The State Budget
49. Health Care Spending Jumps After 55U.S. Health Care Spending By Age, 2004
50. State Taxes Paid by a Married Couple Before and After Retirement
51. State/Local Governments Share of Personal Income Has Declined
52. Estimating the Volatility of a System of Taxes Markowitzs modern portfolio theory used as a guide:
The expected growth rate in revenues is the weighted sum of the individual growth rates
Portfolio volatility is the square root of the weighted sum of the variances and covariances of the individual components
53. Portfolio Theory Suggests Using a Tax System that Minimizes Volatility for a Given Growth Rate Given the trend growth rate, variance and covariance of each major tax, an Efficiency Frontier Line (EFL) can be estimated
The EFL shows combinations of taxes that provide the lowest volatility for each growth rate
Points below the frontier are suboptimal.
The EFL is determined using quadratic programming to minimize state tax revenue volatility, s2T, given growth rates gT
56. Summary Minnesota has been very successful
We are in a period of rapid and critical change
What we do today will shape our future for the next quarter century
Productivity increases will be the key to further growth throughout Minnesota