Four Levels of Clean Water Technology for Industrial/Commercial/Agricultural Applications: Part 4 of 11

1. Four Levels of Clean, Low Cost,Less Known Water Technology for Industrial / Commercial / Agricultural Applications PART 4 OF 11 Environmentally Friendly, Economical, Effective Water Cleantech for The Future Ben Rusuisiak New nature paradigm TECH analysis vancouver, BC, CANADA, updated Feb10, 2017 www.linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm

2. ABSTRACT: This presentation covers some of low cost, water related commercialized cleantech that is under-utilized or not commonly known to exist at all, in areas of 1-Environmental cleaning, 2-HVAC improvement, 3- Energy extraction, 4-Industrial processes, 5-Drinking water generation, 6-Geoengineering, 7-Desalination & wastewater treating, 8-Selective bio-enhancing, rust prevention etc. Some of them are convertible for a use in field of energy, medical, biology, weather modification, material science with similar advantages. 、 • One of such effects not fully explainable by chemistry, yet officially utilized by some non-Western ally nations, is prolonged "water structure", or/& "activated" electrical charge holding capacity of ions in water. There are multiple treatment methods that can cause sustained unique capability in plain water for at least 4-5 days and used without added chemical or solutes. e.g. a-As detergent for commercial kitchen, butcher or heavy oil removal, b-Non fouling industrial cutting or washing fluid, c-Hospital operation room, or food industry equipment disinfectant, d-Medical: oxygen/hydrophobic drug delivery, skin disease/infection/organ, & upto conventionally untreatable chronic disease. e-Plant/animal growth increase, & brackish water feeding, Removing animal residence odor, f-Increase strength of concrete, ice, paper, g-Enhance flavor of pasta, coffee, bakery, h-Low emission fuel making from subgrade incombustible hydrocarbon, i-Display chemical or mineral effect without chemistry present in water. Some exceptionally electrical-active water seems to even function as "phase catalyst" and used as "plain water concentrate" for similar or more robust effects by dilution.、 • Such Scientific Status gap in water tech by nations is fairly common and it affects research funding & market share of effective processes. e.g: water treatment by Time variant magnetic field & Rotating/Concentric Electrode, Far InfraRed waves, Hydrodynamic Cavitation, Sub/SuperCritical water, Non Anthraquinone H2O2, Emulsion fuel, Cold fusion, Resonance H2O decomposing, Acoustic Pulsed Fire Dewatering, Electro-Scavenging effect for rain generation & Cosmic Ray based climate change idea. One reason for discrediting is they might co-display scientifically & economically disruptive seeming thermodynamic over-unity & non-local phenomena. But low cost effective way to displace chemical based system also have been supported in West: Electrooxidation/coagulation or multiple ways of AOP including Ozone was backed by European groups & they are now supporting Plasma Activated Water, Thermal Hydrolysis, Membrane Distillation, & various Nano Filtration etc. Others are accepted but only for certain use: ElectroOsmosis/Poration, Metal ion, 3chamber electrolysis, Vacuum superheated steam, Steam eductor etc. Overall, previously science contested low cost clean water tech is increasingly & rapidly adopted even by multinationals, often accompanied by firm back up of mainstream media, science, & tech awards. And unless spread of this new paradigm stalls soon, limitation based "closed system" belief of society will fundamentally shift to no-limit "open system" before 2030. linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada

3. SELECTED CONTENTS • p10 Crystallization: Template sssddAssisted, Fluidized Bed etc p21 Ozone & UV etc p41 SuperCritical Water etc p45 Ultrasonic, Cavitation effect, . . . Pulsed Combustion Drying p61 Nano/UltraFine Bubble etc p67 PhotoCatalytic water etcp91 Electrolyzed acid water etc p118 Plasma Activated Water • PART4p126 Electrolytic + Venturi etc p141 .Magnetic Water treatment p157 “Phase Catalyst” Water • p181 Torsion field/Scalar Wave p190 Far InfraRed, Bioceramic, …….. Minerals treated etc • p221 Pumpable Ice Slurry p228 ElectroSpray etc p235 ElectroHydraulic effect • p245 Solar Desalination etc p268 SuperHeated Steam etc p288 Magnetic Resonance . Freezing & Thawing • p291 Ion projection p298 Ferrous/Ferrate Ion water p310 Vacuum Saturation/DDW, . Steam Jet Ejector/eductor • p338 Plant Polymer & Micelle p343 Rain Related Weather …….. Modification p358 Water Technology List linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada

4. QUALIFICATION OF INFORMATION • This presentation might not always reflect the views of mainstream group, particularly of western media, large NGOs, & wikipedia; hence attendants/readers are recommended to re-assess the data from independent perspective: Listed commercialized claims include that are contradicting mainstream science law or effectiveness acceptance level, while empirically deemed to produce effects repeatedly. "Cleantech" here includes "clean chemicals" that are non residual: Ozone, Hydrogen Peroxide, Peracetic Acid, Plasma/ElectroChemical reaction etc • Compared to other industries, water technology tends to have wider & varied mechanics to achieve intended physical effects: Labs, schools, even conservative mainstream, or mundane looking companies often use their own effective unique processes not widely known.Many of what is covered here are selected technologies known as effective in some sectors or by small # of consumers but not by other sectors.、 Currently more detailed reference list is being produced & will be published separately: The research is updated based on reviewing academic papers & journals, books, speeches, presentations, patents, lab/commercialized product testimonies/complaints, publications & public records of NGOs/media/research institutes/think tanks/military/space & gov't agencies/industry associations.Due to space constraints, referenced individual names are given with max 3 letters of first name with entire last name(except some non-Western names),& company names are listed in a way that is findable by internet search. • 12 page long Water Technology Effect Comparison Grid List is located at the end of presentation. THIS FILE IS PART 4 of 11 SERIES: ENTIRE 11 SERIES CAN BE VIEWED IN ONE FILE AT: SCRIBD[click here], ISSUU[click here], YUMPU [click here], or CALAMEO [click here] linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

5. ■ Tech effects Code used in tech lists(located at end of this presentation) are headed by Boldface purple letters as on the right. Code might refer to either or both of a-effect of static water product, b-process effect itself on water rather than water's effect on matter. ■ Commercialized tech claims are listed in(Blue Letter +), and “+” within bracket means other unnamed companies also claim same effect. ■ “*” at example D4* indicates particularly effective application. How to Read Tech Detail Explanation Texts . • Technology claims are explained in details in each of 66 dedicated section in coming pages.Example of “Hydrodynamic cavitation” below • ■ 11’Hydrodynamic cavitation: WM Accepted effect: J(BOD reduction, Advanced Oxidizing Process, toxin/oil field waste water/sludge decomposing)(WhirlWind.nl+), For ballast water(Globallast ua+), Enhanced oil recovery- additional hydrocarbon quality improvement(Arisdyne+), • Sometimes WM Disputedeffect,A(Descaling), HVAC application(HyCator, VRTX Technologies+), Pipe cleaning(Group Konstanta «МАНГУСТ»+), Dairy product flow pipe descaling is WM rejected(TEKMASH+): B(anticorrosion of water pipes), C(Algae removal)(CT Systems ua+), D4*(New….

6. ■ 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi treatment: (also related ♛ Static Electricity Ionized Water subsection at end of section): Much less studied than time variant magnetic water treatment but very similar effect observed in often stronger degree, Consistent theoretical claims on electrical static/ionizing effect produced by alloy core and metallic cylinder outside - some devices need earth grounding(RSI Team Green+). And this is presumably affecting water or dissolved minerals’ molecule behavior(electrostatic charge) for various effects, and combination of metal water friction followed by Venturi Cavitation with sudden pressure drop as key process. With significant backlash-debunking from WM mainstream backed groups most devices have money back guarantee 2-12months. Effect is too obvious to ignore and barely keeping pseudoscience status by consistent effort by Western mainstream institutions, some of them “accidentally” confirm their effect and later retract. Full mainstream tech in many Non-West nations. 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi: Effect mix of Disputed, Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by Western Mainstream(WM) linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

7. WM media disputedeffect: C&D(Algae germ stifling as process & as water): (Fre Flo Water+), virtually accepted at science level due to electrolyte of Zinc or Copper can cause those effects even water passes quickly, L(Drinking water generation [non desalination]+), used as part of filtration processes, but stand alone is uncompetitive, Generally WM Rejectedeffect: Some devices need replacement of metal electrolytic parts from 3months to 5yrs, while others are non-sacrificial type. Flowing pattern to create turbulence greatly differs by manufacturer. Sometimes combined with A&B(Scale removal, anti corrosion/rust) claims(SilkWater משביח מים ביתי, IOREX+, B2(less water required by plants), some of mechanical explanations given for this effect are altering ionization of electrolyte or charge polarity of water molecule, hence it becomes more suitable to be absorbed by plants(this effect is usually associated with "clustering effect" or water structure, or cell like water), This research, & both mainstream/debunked fringe water scientists tend to see idea of "small cluster" as cause of increased cell permeation-hydration is less probable than "charged water i.e. negative electron attached, or reduced state, charge gradient" effect), 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi treatment, Static Electricity Ionized Water: continued 2 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

8. -->> cont: Generally WM Rejectedeffect: C2*(Plant grow in salt/toxin water/soil enhance/desalination), strong effect and mainstream use within some sector in western nations(eg Dry brackish water aquifer Australian farming area) despite damage control denial effort by WM. Mechanics might be also that "ionized water" has improved performance of plant metabolism even with NaCl water content. Weaker effect: E(industrial cleaner), F(Laundry detergent as water)(Vibrant Water Purification System+): weaker compared to Ozone but enhance detergent ability with cold water, and at certain light washing no detergents in rare cases, Q(Metal working fluid, cutting fluid or surfactant), J(Toxin neutralizing, waste water cleaning): Not as AOP, but fairly consistent(but not always)experimental/anecdotal user indication on altering of Chlorine effect. This claim is also made on magnetic/electric water treatment etc and seems to be due to some kind of ionization effect HClO to increasingly turn to ClO⁻ regardless of pH(pseudoscientific effect). Occasionally claimed as N(Food washing liquid) 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi treatment, Static Electricity Ionized Water: continued 3 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

9. WM Fully rejected effect: despite seeming pressure against it, some Western Academics and local Govn’t authorities often quietly endorse fairly significant & consistent agricultural effects: X(Plant animal grow larger-faster with more nutrition, less smell cattle/chicken residence or excrement etc), D2(Human preferred herb-insect- germ- enhancement) by feeding water in the area Other commercialized eg: (CareFree Water Conditioner, Morill Industries, PHT Water Improver, Zeta-Core USA, SoftWater Conditioners, Ejax, HydroDrive+) Variation examples: Silver use(Wold-unwelttechnoologie+), Equally effective but sacrificial anode(Aquabion+), Or needs monthly anode change & specific North-South orientation for best effect(Solavite+), One of the largest in this category with 200,000units+ installed(ScaleBuster+), Heavy industrial focus(Scale Ban India,+) 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi treatment, Static Electricity Ionized Water: continued 4 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada

10. Sub Category ♛Static Electricity Ionized Water treatment: eg1: To create same range of effect as Electrolytic Metal & Venturi but no metal alloy used. Commercialized examples are rare: One of theoretical claim explanation is: Friction between water and inside “gate”(Carbon, Aluminium, Epoxy etc, or some kind of Electrolet) generates certain electron flow into water perpendicularly to its flow to create effect. Commercialized eg: (Ecotec-inc.com,Suprion AquaFlow,νG7- NewG7+), Similar to "fresh water version" of Leyden Jar like mechanics. eg2: Detergent effect: Seems completely different/unrelated but similar purported mechanics: Powder based non chemical detergent water “electrolyzed Sodium Carbonate” NaHCO3in which fish can live: (バジャン ライトウエーブ) eg3: High voltage ElectricPulse projected in water soaks soil, activates plants and causes same range of effects as Electrolytic treatment (Narasaki-Int - 楢崎研究所+), eg4: High voltage with no current exposed seeds 24hrs significantly(not necessarily in water) “alters gene expression”(Unlisted effect, complete WM pseudoscience or fraud)(Chiba-Geigy, FIOS GreenBox): 24’Electrolytic Metal Alloy + Venturi treatment, Static Electricity Ionized Water: continued 5 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

11. ■ 25’Electrostatic treatment(also see 26'Electric Pulse), Here definition is high voltage “stick” coated with dielectric material inserted in water flow, Often combined as sub process to amplify main effects(Ener-tec.com, Hkapc Ion Stick+). In this section other types of electric pulse with similar effects are included. WM Acceptedeffect: H(Oil-water separation) see “H2” below, S(Coagulation, separation of particle/toxin etc): (Endress+Hauser, FlowMark Water+), metal flocculant/colloidal particles seeded from electrode etc to alter repulsing static charge to attraction, fully mainstream electrocoagulation application(induction might generate microplama). The fact WM media approves this effect which is in direct relation to next page’s debunked “A: Antiscaling effect” shows its inconsistent logic applied, Generally expensive mainstream offered effect is mostly media approved while same mechanics device is debunked when device price is far less, H2(Dewatering of sludge, oil, masonry etc): widely utilized application of Electrostatic Desalting/Dewatering at crude oil refining process(Electrostatic Coalescence)(Cameron, Prosernat+) : causes water in oil to oscillate with electrostatic and make water droplets acceleratingly larger for easy recovery 25’Electrostatic treatment: Effect mix of, Accepted, Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by (WM) linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada

12. WM generally Rejectedeffect: A(descaling),(PermaClean Water, ELECTROchem, Cnpeide.com,+), this electrostatic repulsing of molecules to prevent scale deposit effect is completely WM science approved common sense while it remains strong debunking target by some WM media- to which academic abstain from openly criticizing. C&D(Algae bacteria stifling by process, or as water)(Also see 42'Electroporation)(Envirovision jp +) some claims by pulsating electrostatic -changing electric charge suffocate algae-microbe cells by sticking together, while repelling off pipe wall of silica type solutes. Micro voltage device can "superactivate" already electrical negative superfine/nanobubbles and applied nanobbule water works as disinfectant with electroporation effects(Tennant - Orbio - Water Star+), Micro Voltage electromedicine device can be discharged into water(equivalent strength as most Electrostatic) with selected frequency to kill all microbes(ParaZapper +): since it is illegal in many western nations to state what non-mainstream approved medical devices can do, some advertise as water treatment device, 25’Electrostatic treatment: continued 2 • イノフェルト linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

13. -->>cont: WM generally Rejectedeffect: M(spray water to ionize air that contain hydroxyl to disinfect germs):(Talya Water, Gatrimon Orodox+), O(remove odor of housing by feeding cattle water): (FujiKeiSokki 電子水+) Occasionally claimed effect: B(Pipe corrosion/rust prevention/fouling)(Zeta Rod+)by naturally causing dissolved microbes to repel each other, X(Lower redox value) WM Fully rejected effect: Z(Plant, animal enhancement, catalyst to ferment food, drink, manure):(Customized Water System CWS, WaterChangers+), unlisted application but conventional wood drying can be enhanced 20-30% by spraying treated water over it- claimed to increase ion-electron activity. Also reduce oxidation during the process, This “Z” category effectiveness increases when ground has biochar buried(E-Maeda.org+), 25’Electrostatic treatment: continued 3 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada

14. ■ 26’Electric field, Electromagnetic/Electric field pulse(also see 25'Electrostatic) etc, treatment; variant frequency electric field affects water crystallization by likely ionization/excitation of molecule or its bonding. Major pseudoscienzation of this tech along with Time Variant Magnetic Water Treatment tech at WM media & academia level until recently, Cost difference of using this tech against chemical/conventional tech use is large in terms of device, maintenance, man power cost. Yet there seems to be significant performance/effectiveness gap between manufacturers in this tech, due to lack of own standard device test protocol or industry association: any company can just wrap wires from frequency generator or magnet around the pipe and present as a product Commercially viable effect is at least 75% of case in properly installed std modern device:, some seems to be over 90%. Unworkability can be due to excess water temperature, strong external magnetic field presence to hinder effect, water is static (major issue with magnetic treatment, but does affect electric pulse type also to less extent), super high hardness-salt content etc, but still some causes are unexplainable as even those supposedly unworkable situations it works about 1/2 of time. 26’Electric field, EM pulse: Effect mix of Accepted, Disputed, Generally Rejected, Fully rejected by Western Mainstream(WM) linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

15. It has been “vogue” in WM science publication to emphasize failed device function(about 40% of paper showed insufficient or no effects, while most Non Western nations’[Russia, India, Slovenia, Iran, China, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia etc] academic reports are practically 100% success rate, then talk about how to improve performance & application), type of academic approach abstained from publishing if it were WM accepted tech in order to avoid criticism & keep the job. But in strict sense WM approved tech of spectroscopy research or crystallization of calcite deposit scale form altered to aragonite repeatedly showing & fully accepted water/scale quality difference after magnetic or electric treatment for at least since 2005. Also ortho Hydrogen's high activity vs Para Hydrogen and magnetic reactivity of former is WM science approved along with Oxygen reactivity: - hence this water effect is practically undeniable. Just like Cold Fusion for energy(see 18'Electrolysis Alkaline-Acid mixed), still overt conveniently selective scientific debunking data is supported sometimes, Electric type of device is most widely sold and used in residential market, usually stand alone technology devices. Most makers provide 3-12month money back guarantee, some industrial application types mandate preconsultation/site visit prior to purchase. Similar to Time Variant Magnetic Water treatment device, effect and price range differs considerably. 26’Electric field, EM pulse: continued 2 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm- Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada

16. Interesting, right? This is just a sneak preview of the full presentation. We hope you like it! To see the rest of it, just click here to view it in full on PowerShow.com. Then, if you’d like, you can also log in to PowerShow.com to download the entire presentation for free.