130 likes | 238 Views
CS 197 Review of Presentations. Aditya Mathur, Instructor CS 197 Freshman Honors Seminar. Presentation. a. Slides. b. Delivery. 2. Depth. 3. Miscellaneous. November 25, 2002. General Remarks. Presentation. a. Slides:. Brief. Figures preferred over text. Avoid complex text entry.
E N D
CS 197 Review of Presentations Aditya Mathur, Instructor CS 197 Freshman Honors Seminar Presentation a. Slides b. Delivery 2. Depth 3. Miscellaneous November 25, 2002 CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
General Remarks Presentation a. Slides: Brief Figures preferred over text Avoid complex text entry. Animate figures where possible Colors: good contrast Colors: good contrast CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
General Remarks (continued) b.Delivery Avoid reading from notes Dynamism helps but is a matter of personal taste Speech must be in sync with the material on the slide Avoid “basically” “like” “uh” …. No drinking or eating Hands out of pockets Maintain eye contact (not with one but with the audience) Speak loud enough CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
General Remarks (continued) 2.Depth Decide on what to focus State and explain objective Define terms used Use example(s) to explain Avoid material that most in the audience will likely know Clearly state research questions What has been done? What has not been done? CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 1: Holographic Memories Presentation a. Slides: Well organized b. Delivery Excellent 2. Depth Good job, informative, in-depth into holographic storage, noise/error correction, interfacing-well done; good comparison between conventional and holographic memories. CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 2: Quantum Computing Presentation a. Slides: Lot of graphics not large enough, too much text; neat spiral graphics b. Delivery Reading off-the slides 2. Depth Good depth and breadth CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 3: Nanotechnology Presentation a. Slides: Blended well Sometimes too much material (everything on slide!) b. Delivery Not on time… Second presentation: significant improvement 2. Depth CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 4: Quantum Computing Presentation a. Slides: Excellent b. Delivery Watch out for ‘Umm’s; seemed unsure of material; memorized? 2. Depth Good choice (Shor’s algorithm) Could have walked thru an example Factoring: unclear CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 5: Quantum Computing Presentation a. Slides: Excellent b. Delivery Well done. 2. Depth Parallel universe idea unclear Reversible vs. non-reversible gate: good. Quantum adder notion left unclear Team 4: review too short! CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 6: Nanotechnology Presentation a. Slides: Good b. Delivery Too much reading; third presentation was the best of the three. 2. Depth Good breadth Review from Team 3 not available. CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 7: Cryptography Presentation a. Slides: Excellent b. Delivery Excellent 2. Depth Excellent CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Team 8: AI Presentation a. Slides: Not more than 1 slide on Loebner prize b. Delivery Third presentation best of three. Fuzzy logic: good but went over it too fast. 2. Depth Min-max trees: good; Details of Alice: very good. CS 197 Presentation Evaluation
Final Words Research is interesting and needed. 2. Useful and rewarding 3. You get to do new things! Develop new techniques. Evaluate existing methods and products Questions? CS 197 Presentation Evaluation