1 / 16

CS 397 Review of Presentations

CS 397 Review of Presentations. Aditya Mathur, Instructor CS 397 Honors Seminar. Presentation. a. Slides. b. Delivery. 2. Depth. 3. Miscellaneous. November 20, 2002. General Remarks. Presentation. a. Slides:. Brief. Figures preferred over text. Avoid complex text entry.

qamar
Download Presentation

CS 397 Review of Presentations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CS 397 Review of Presentations Aditya Mathur, Instructor CS 397 Honors Seminar Presentation a. Slides b. Delivery 2. Depth 3. Miscellaneous November 20, 2002 CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  2. General Remarks Presentation a. Slides: Brief Figures preferred over text Avoid complex text entry. Animate figures where possible Colors: good contrast Colors: good contrast CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  3. General Remarks (continued) b.Delivery Avoid reading from notes Dynamism helps but is a matter of personal taste Speech must be in sync with the material on the slide Avoid “basically” “like” “uh” …. No drinking or eating Hands out of pockets Maintain eye contact (not with one but with the audience) Speak loud enough CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  4. General Remarks (continued) 2.Depth Decide on what to focus State and explain objective Define terms used Use example(s) to explain Avoid material that most in the audience will likely know Clearly state research questions What has been done? What has not been done? CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  5. Team 1: PERL 6 Presentation a. Slides: Well organized Often too much material b. Delivery Too much time spent on small details 2. Depth Focus more on new technology CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  6. Team 2: Wireless Information Systems Presentation a. Slides: Well organized individually but not integrated Often too much material b. Delivery Often not in-sync with the slides 2. Depth Lot of breadth but lacked depth CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  7. Team 3: Genetic Programming Presentation a. Slides: Blended well Sometimes too much material (everything on slide!) b. Delivery Easy to follow Took turns to present 2. Depth How does the algorithm work? CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  8. Team 4: Vulnerability Management Presentation a. Slides: Good and informative b. Delivery Good overall, avoid reading from notes 2. Depth Lacked depth Informative, broad focus Marketing style CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  9. Team 5: HCI Presentation a. Slides: Good b. Delivery Good overview 2. Depth Good depth, fish eye menus, 3D user interfaces Applied research? Overall: very good presentation CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  10. Team 6: Voice Recognition Presentation a. Slides: Very good b. Delivery Good eye contact 2. Depth Good breadth and depth Very good presentation CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  11. Team 7: Game Development Presentation a. Slides: Very good, used only as a guide b. Delivery Eye contact Little reading 2. Depth Sufficient amount of substance One of the best CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  12. Team 8: AI Presentation a. Slides: Too much textual matter b. Delivery Often bulleted material not explained No reading Chess: very good 2. Depth Lacked depth Excellent presentation CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  13. Team 9: AI in Video Games Presentation a. Slides: Good. b. Delivery Good introduction Not everyone familiar with games (Baldur’s gate) 2. Depth More depth needed. Title and intelligent agents? No game discussed in detail. Focus needed. CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  14. Team 10: Personalization Presentation a. Slides: Very Good. b. Delivery Good introduction Eye contact needs improvement! 2. Depth Good depth (ART 1) Good use of examples, well explained, interesting. CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  15. Team 11: Mobile/Wireless Presentation a. Slides: Good. b. Delivery Neither stunning nor empty! Too much reading! 2. Depth Tie in to CS not discussed (except for one speaker) Good discussion of user interface. More focus needed CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

  16. Final Words Research is interesting and needed. 2. Useful and rewarding 3. You get to do new things! Develop new techniques. Evaluate existing methods and products Questions? CS 397 Presentation Evaluation

More Related