170 likes | 195 Views
The EPWP and Conditional Grants in the 2006-07 Division of Revenue Bill 7 March 2006 Department of Public Works. Summary of Presentation. EPWP-related conditional grants in the Bill Provincial Infrastructure Grant Municipal Infrastructure Grant National Electrification Programme
E N D
The EPWP and Conditional Grants in the 2006-07 Division of Revenue Bill7 March 2006Department of Public Works
Summary of Presentation • EPWP-related conditional grants in the Bill • Provincial Infrastructure Grant • Municipal Infrastructure Grant • National Electrification Programme • Progress to date • EPWP Outputs • Support Initiatives • New Initiatives • Challenges • Reporting • Use of EPWP Guidelines
EPWP Conditional Grants (1) • Provincial Infrastructure Grant (PIG) • Measurable outputs: • Number of job opportunities created and the average length of employment for labour intensive projects • Number of persons participating in the training programs under the EPWP • Condition: • Low-volume roads and stormwater projects should be implemented in compliance the EPWP Tender and Design Guidelines • MTEF allocations: • 06-07: 4,118 million • 07-08: 5,324 million • 08-09: 5,697 million • Monitoring • Specific reports will be submitted by the provinces on progress with the implementation of EPWP projects
EPWP Conditional Grants (2) • Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) • Measurable outputs: • Number of jobs created using expanded public works guidelines (for above outputs) • Condition: • Municipalities must adhere to the labour-intensive construction methods in terms of the EPWP Tender and Design Guidelines • MTEF allocations: • 06-07: 6,265 million • 07-08: 7,148 million • 08-09: 8,053 million • Monitoring • Each sector national or provincial department will be expected to fulfill monitoring role
EPWP Conditional Grants (3) • National Electrification Programme (NEP) • Measurable outputs • Implementation of labour-intensive methods on electrification projects and the number of jobs created • Condition: • Adhere to the labour-intensive construction methods in terms of the EPWP Guidelines for activities such as trenching, planting of poles etc. • MTEF allocations: • 06-07: 391 million • 07-08: 406 million • 08-09: 457 million • Monitoring • Monthly reports to National Treasury
Progress 04-05 (PIG) *Expenditure on EPWP projects exceeded 1/3 of PIG, which was EPWP target
Progress EPWP from MIG Source: MIG MIS *Reports reflects only limited share of value of MIG projects being reported as labour-intensive EPWP projects. Target to increase to 33% of value. EPWP data often not reported or only partially completed on MIG MIS, making EPWP reporting difficult for MIG.
Progress 05-06 1st qtr (NEP) *EPWP condition is new, from 05-06 financial year. EPWP conditions need to be introduced in planning stages of projects, hence more EPWP electrification projects will start this year.
Role of DPW • DPW does not approve any projects or transfer any funds for EPWP projects • Monitoring and evaluation: • Collects data from implementing bodies on criteria such as numbers of jobs, training provided, participation of women and youth • Produces quarterly EPWP progress reports (available on website (www.epwp.gov.za) • Carrying out evaluation studies on samples of EPWP projects • Support to implementing bodies: • Training of contractors and engineers in management of labour-intensive projects and design of infrastructure for labour-intensive construction • National training initiatives with DoL and CETA, in which all implementing bodies can participate • Training of provincial and municipal officials • Training of emerging contractors to carry out labour-intensive projects for implementing bodies • Production of technical guidelines for design and management of labour-intensive projects • Documentation and promotion of good practices (eg Gundo Lashu, Zibambele)
Support Initiatives: EPWP Guidelines • Condition on all the grants to use the guidelines in order to make projects part of EPWP • Training to municipal and provincial officials provided (over 1000 officials trained through LG SETA-CETA programme) • Support with using guidelines available through National and Provincial EPWP Units • Promoting compliance: • National Transferring Officers can query why projects are not being reported on in terms of EPWP • Auditor General will audit provinces and municipalities who are ignoring EPWP conditions in DORA
Vuk’uphile programme • Programme developed with the Construction SETA to build capacity among individuals and emerging contractors to implement EPWP projects • Implemented as a partnership with provinces and municipalities, which allocate projects to the learners to implement so that they can gain practical experience • Partnership with ABSA to ensure access to credit for emerging contractors • IDT and DOL ensure that all workers receive training • Target to implement 1000 contractor and 2000 site supervisor learnerships (funding secured for 1500 learnerships, application for another 1500 learnerships with NSF)
Currently 290 contractors and 580 supervisors in training • 39 provincial departments and municipalities have signed MOU’s for 2175 learnerships • DPW does overall programme management and administration to minimise additional work for public bodies • DPW also provides mentors for learner contractors • DPW also does overall evaluation of programme to ensure that learners are developing into independent contractors • Vuk’uphile programme now established in every province
Scaling up the EPWP through the PIG • Proposal developed together with Department of Transport to scale up the EPWP under ASGI-SA • Proposal for R4.5 billion initiative over 3 year period to focus on labour-intensive road construction and maintenance • Builds on good overall performance of roads sector and additional funds required especially for access roads • Proposed that allocations should made through the PIG, but specifically allocated to labour-intensive roads programmes • Anticipated outputs: • Additional long-term jobs in road maintenance : 60 000 • Target number of additional short-term employment opportunities in road construction : 100 000 • Number of km of additional km of roads to be maintained : 45 000 km • Number of km of roads to be constructed : 3 000 km
Challenges: Reporting • Provinces are reporting • All reporting for EPWP is based on project level data, no aggregated data accepted, but not sufficiently detailed information available on the MIG MIS • Obtaining reports directly from all 284 municipalities difficult, danger of overburdening municipalities with reporting requirements • EPWP Unit now obtaining direct reports from: • Municipalities participating in Vuk’uphile • Cities in SA Cities Network • Large district and local municipalities
Challenges: Use of EPWP Guidelines • Many public bodies still reluctant to use labour-intensive methods as specified in the EPWP Guidelines • If EPWP Guidelines are not used, projects often not as labour- intensive as they could be (small increases the use of local labour) • Guidelines also specify training entitlements for workers and if not used in tender documentation, accessing training becomes more difficult • Contractors have not been sufficiently encouraged to meet the training requirements through EPWP tenders from public bodies • Increased auditing of compliance with DORA conditions required to raise awareness of importance of compliance