1 / 15

Life-Cycle Benefits of Model-Based Integrated Health Management

Life-Cycle Benefits of Model-Based Integrated Health Management. Samuel Johnson Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Life Cycle Logistics & Support. eXpress Users Group Meeting 14 Sep 2012. Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642.

Download Presentation

Life-Cycle Benefits of Model-Based Integrated Health Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Life-Cycle Benefits of Model-Based Integrated Health Management Samuel Johnson Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Life Cycle Logistics & Support eXpress Users Group Meeting 14 Sep 2012 Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  2. IHM Operational Elements(for purposes of this presentation IHM = PHM = ISHM = IVHM) Vehicle IHM System Fault Management, Reporting & Recording Ground IHM System Provides: Operator Interface / Mission Control • AV-Level Info Management • Reliable FDIR • Prognostics / Trends • Supports ALE Safety Critical MC Displays & Controls & Control Display Unit (CDU) Mission Critical Subsystem Control & Health Mgmt Data Terminal Diagnostic Data Propulsion . Automated Pre-Flight Checkout Avionics In-Flight Maintenance Data Link Vehicle HM Thermal Control • Support System • Automated Operator / Maintainer Debrief • Off-Board Prognostics • Trending • Life Cycle Mgmt • Store / Distribute Diagnostic Database Airframe Portable Maintenance Device (PMD) • Enabling Technologies • Diagnostics & Prognostics • Cross-Subsystem FDIR • Model-Based Development & Testability Analysis • Fault Signature Detection Fault Codes Flight Data Recorder Maintenance Panel Fault / Service Info DB Maintainer Vehicle Interface IETMs Consumables On-Board Diagnostics Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  3. Objective of Model-Based Diagnostic Design Analysis - Support “Design for Maintainability” While Reducing Costs Architect for Growth Design for Supportability Improve Maintenance & Sustainment Use Model-Based Testability Analysis Tools to Assess Fault Coverage vs. Reqmts Reduce Replication in Related FMECA and Testability Analysis Efforts Support IETM Generation and Informed Maintenance Activities Enable Effective Discrepancy Analysis and Design Updates During Sustainment Reduce Time Required to Develop Variants of Baseline Vehicle Design Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  4. Model-Based System Design and Life Cycle Logistics Loop • Inner “Sustainment Triangle (Loop)” is Executed Many Times Within a Typical Product’s Life Cycle • Shared System Model Facilitates Timely Life Cycle Support, Block Upgrades, & Configuration Management Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  5. OPERATION & EVALUATION Common Modeling Tools & DatabasesFacilitate Design Adaptation and Re-Use System Analysis & Optimization Identify areas in which system is not performing as predicted or required; determine root causes, and take corrective actions. INTEGRATION & TEST DEVELOPMENT System Model Model-Based Design and Analysis Tools Integrated Health Management Design, Analysis, and Other Model-Based Systems Engineering Tools and Processes Model-Based Development Tools Provide a Single, Configuration-Managed, Up-to-Date Source for Design Information – Facilitating Model Re-Use and knowledge capturing Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  6. Current Design Analysis Methods Repeat Similar Thought Processes for Related Products Current Process (Simplified View) Replicated Thought Processes and “Filtered” Information Flow Tech PubsEngineer System RE IETMs Trouble-Shooting Procedures Test Plans Testability Analysis Reports FMECA Report Hazards Analysis R&M Metrics MTTR, Ao Predicts TestEngineer Safety Engineer System RE System RE Reliability Engineer System RE Model-Based Diagnostic Design & Analysis Provides an Opportunity to Reduce Replication of Effort When Deriving Related Products Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  7. Model-Based Process Reduces Duplication of Effort and Simplifies Analysis Model-BasedProcess Logistics Simulations R&M Metrics Functional Dependencies, Failure Modes, and Test Points Model MTTR, Ao ETOS, Predictions System Modeler (RM&S IPT) System RE FMECA Report Updates Testability Analysis Reports Trouble-Shooting Procedures IETM Inputs NGAS Analysis Predicts > 60% Reduction in Testability Analysis Costs Over System Life-Cycle By Investing in the Development of Diagnostic Models for Systems, One Can Transition to a More Timely and Cost-Effective Automated Testability Analysis and Report Generation Process Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  8. Key Model Characteristics for Health Management Applications • For our purposes a model must support the representation of: • Physical Features or Properties of Components • Static/Fixed Part (e.g., the number and type of I/O ports) • Functional, Operational, Behavioral Description of Components • Dynamic/Procedural/Executable Part (e.g., the function performed) • Connectivity between Components • Functional Dependencies and Fault Propagation Paths • A Graphic Depiction of the Model That Simplifies Understanding • Enables Efficient Model Input, Explanation, and Human Interaction Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  9. That’s What I’m Talkin’ About! (DSI’s FAMOUS Braking System)

  10. Model-Based Diagnostic & Prognostic Design & Analysis Tools Selection Criteria • Here are some of the key tool and supplier criteria that we considered in making our decision to go with eXpress: • Testability Analysis / Fault Coverage Analysis • FMECA (Failure Modes, Effects, & Criticality Analysis) Import/Export • Design Analysis & Engineering Trade-Study Data • Interoperability / Data Exchange with Other Tools • User-Interface Features / Ease-of-Use • Diagnostic & Prognostic Performance Simulation • Software Performance Characteristics • Real-Time Diagnostic Software Generation and Support • Interactive Maintenance Support (for End-Users/Maintenance Personnel) • Technology and Integration Readiness Levels • Company Status & History • Real-World Applications • Software Licensing Options / Terms & Conditions • Software Training, Documentation & Customer Support Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  11. Additional Benefits of Model-Based Design and Analysis • Provides Design Insights for Improving Fault Coverage • Example: Landing Gear Fault Isolation Improvement • Fault Isolation to Single Unit: 23% Improvement after BIT Change • False Removal% (STAGE): 21% Improvement after BIT Change • Reduces Time and Cost for FMECA Report Updates • Accelerates Tech Pubs Fault Isolation Manual Development • Supports Model-Based Maintenance Training and Execution • Aids in Test Plan Development & Execution • Provides Diagnostic Design Knowledge Capture • Enables Model Re-Use for System Upgrades and Variants • Facilitates Diagnostic Model Configuration Management • Informs System Analysis & Optimization (SA&O) • Generates Cumulative ROI over Entire Product Life-Cycle ROI and Business Case Development for Application of Model-Based Tools and Processes to Other Life-Cycle Phases is In Progress Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  12. Managing Complexity in AerospaceThrough Model-Based Systems Engineering Aerospace Programs Require More Than 5 Times Longer to Perform Comparable Development & Sustainment Tasks as the Auto & Electronics Industries DARPA Study Results Where We Are Application of Modern Model-Based Systems Engineering, Development, Integration, and Testing, Methods Where We Need to Be Key Reasons for ”The Gap”: Inconsistent Aerospace Application of Model-Based Systems Engineering Tools & Processes Differences in Aerospace Systems Acquisition and Regulatory Environment and Time-Frame Lack of Integrated Model-Based Design, Analysis, Production, and/or Operations Tools Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  13. Model-Based System Design Enables Performance-Based Logistics Improvements Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

  14. OPERATIONS / LOGISTICS Model-Based System Development and Sustainment Loop System Analysis & Optimization Identify areas in which system is not performing as predicted or required; determine root causes, and take corrective actions. Enterprise Stakeholder Teams Operation Teams INTEGRATION & TEST DEVELOPMENT Model-Based Design and Analysis Tools Integrated Health Management Design, Analysis, and Other Model-Based Systems Engineering Tools and Processes Approved for Public Release; Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Cases 11-0143 and 12-0642

More Related