160 likes | 289 Views
Restaurant Inaccessibility:. Present Day Discrimination. By: Miranda Sue Terry, M.S. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Stephen J. Notaro, Ph.D. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Diane L. Smith, Ph.D., OTR/L University of Missouri. History.
E N D
Restaurant Inaccessibility: Present Day Discrimination By: Miranda Sue Terry, M.S. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Stephen J. Notaro, Ph.D. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Diane L. Smith, Ph.D., OTR/L University of Missouri
History • The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 • Breakdown barriers for People with Disabilities: • Employment • Transportation • Public Accommodations & Services • Telecommunications
History • “…By breaking down these barriers, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) • will enable society to benefit from the skills and talents of individuals with disabilities, • will allow us all to gain from their increased purchasing power and ability to use it, and • will lead to fuller, more productive lives for all Americans.” • Source: http://www.ada.gov/q%26aeng02.htm
Title III • Provide some examples of private businesses: • Doctor’s Offices • Theatres • Schools/Day Care Centers • Hotels/Bars • Parks, Zoos, etc. • Restaurants ***
Restaurants • Great example of private businesses offering goods and services • What kinds of services do restaurants provide? • Food • Alcohol • Community Participation • Socialization Opportunities
Restaurants • How often do you go out to eat… • Once a month? • Twice a month? • Once a week? • Twice a week? • Five times a week? • At least once daily?
Restaurants • 57% vs. 73% (16% gap) • In the 18- to 29- age group • the gap shrinks to 64% vs. 71% (7% gap) • Source: National Organization on Disability (NOD)/Harris Interactive Survey (2004)
Research • Focuses on restaurant accessibility. • Hypothesis: • Nationally-owned restaurants would be more compliant with the ADA than locally-owned restaurants.
Research • Type of study • an observational, • cross-sectional, and • descriptive study of restaurant accessibility • based on the minimum guidelines for public buildings per ADA Title III. • These minimum guidelines were used to determine compliance levels of restaurants.
Research • Sampling frame: • Included were 271 bars and cafés that were listed under the restaurant section of the 2008-2009 Yellowbook and served food were included in the sampling frame. • 11 national • 15 local
Research • Response rate: 77% • 20 out of 26 restaurants participated • Data for 54 guidelines was collected from 20 restaurants • Total of 1080 measurements
Research • Based on the hypothesis, do you think… • Nationally-owned restaurants more compliant? • Locally-owned restaurants more compliant? • Results: • Locally-owned restaurants were more compliant. • No restaurants were 100% compliant
Important • SO, why is this important? • Discrimination is wrong • If individuals with disabilities cannot utilize the restaurant for leisure purposes then it also eliminates the possibility of employment • Accessibility can benefit everyone not only people with disabilities • For example…
Important • AND… • Disabilities can be congenital or acquired; thus, an individual without a disability can join this minority group as result of aging or accidents.
ADD!!! • Pictures of most common inaccessible features (? As on poster) • Results chart (? As on poster) • Business Incentives for becoming more accessible (tax breaks & incentives) • New 2012 deadlines for compliance