1 / 13

Strategic Learning Outcomes:

Strategic Learning Outcomes:. Developing a scalable training program to facilitate restructuring of MPU educational systems. 7.17.08 Executive Leadership Forum. Vision Statement. Mashed Potato University will be a leader among elite research universities in providing

aminia
Download Presentation

Strategic Learning Outcomes:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Strategic Learning Outcomes: Developing a scalable training program to facilitate restructuring of MPU educational systems 7.17.08 Executive Leadership Forum

  2. Vision Statement Mashed Potato University will be a leader among elite research universities in providing student centered active learning experiences.

  3. What are Learning Outcomes? • Traditional inputs/outputs contrasted with new measures of educational effectiveness • Documentation and demonstration of acquired competencies • Broad outcomes such as critical thinking • Specific outcomes vary by academic discipline • Responds to multiple learning styles

  4. Why Change? • Increases potential employer confidence • Provides authentic student experience • Increases quality of faculty work life • Lowers per student cost • Increases access to higher education • Aligns strategic institutional vision • Leverages institutional strengths

  5. Authentic Learning!

  6. Assumptions • Builds on existing campus partnerships & tools • Program development utilizes available resources • Curriculum redesign creates net per-student savings. • New policies will respond to P&T concerns to motivate faculty participation

  7. Risks • Lack of faculty and staff support (time, vision & rewards) • Difficult to adapt to shared goals campus-wide • Program will require future investment • Inadequate assessment

  8. Training Program • “Train the Trainer” pyramid-style training insures broad diffusion of innovation • Sustained through an online community of practice • Provides outcomes-based model rubrics

  9. Generation of exit outcomes Phase outcomes Course outcomes Lesson outcomes Design Process for Learning Outcomes

  10. Program Goals • Develop models for outcome based learning • Engage faculty/staff in change process • Provide new skill sets • Foster culture of instructional innovation & collaboration • Leverage existing partnerships & resources

  11. Assessment • Increased use of virtual course content • Faculty adoption of community of practice resources • Measurable decrease of per student cost • Student & faculty satisfaction increase • External advisors will assess and report increased 21st century work skills

  12. Budget Year One - Opportunity Cost: Project & support staff reallocation Year Two – Expand Hardware & Storage Space Absorbed through CIO budget allocations Year Three – Staff & Hardware Investment supported by increased enrollment revenue

  13. Task Force Acknowledgement • Drew MacGregor, Sr. Vice Provost – sponsor • Cheryl Diermyer, Senior Strategist, CIO • Sarah McDaniel, Dir., CTLR • Hope Adams, Chair, Faculty Senate • Sam Eneman, Dir. Academic Computing • Lisa Stephens, Sr. Academic Tech. Officer • Paul Gunther, Senior Instructional Designer • Robert Griffiths, Associate Dean, Libraries

More Related