( acquire ) ( transmit ) ( share )

1. Wireless Digital Systemfor intra-oral radiographywithBluetoothtechnology WDS ( acquire )( transmit )( share )

2. X-ray CCD sensor know any better than wireless?

3. precedingthebreach about strings attached? cable damage is the number one cause of sensor malfunction

4. nice and clean • 0,6m cable only. • Stronger and difficult to breakif compared to 3m cables. • Prevents the sensor fromdropping on the floor. • No power supply cords.

5. proven technology • CCD ( acquire ) • state of the art three-layers receptor (scintillator, fiber-optics, CCD) • Bluetooth ( transmit ) • nominative transmission avoids interference,economic off-the-shelf receivers • TWAIN ( share ) • consumer standard, highest degree of compatibility with third party software applications (just like a flatbed scanner)

6. two sensor sizes available size 11.50 M.pixels6.00 cm2 size 22.04 M.pixels8.16 cm2

7. quick and easy • Enhanced image transfer. • Improved workflow during multiple image acquisition. • Easy configuration. • Broad compatibility with third party software. • Wide range of Bluetooth receivers.

8. exceptional image quality Regardless of the imaging application in use, thanks to the proprietary PREVIEW window, with image enhancements.

9. workflow speed Fast image transfer (average 5 to 10 seconds) and very short pause between multiple image acquisitions. The speed is comparable to wired systems, with the additional freedom of a wireless handheld device.

10. ease of setup Search and selection of sensors in use is done only once, at installation time, through the MyRay Monitor utility. No need for further settings during the day by day operation.

11. broad selection of receivers WDS is compatible with any* Bluetooth receiver, embedded or external. One MyRay Bluetooth Dongle is also supplied. *Note: the performance with third party Bluetooth receivers cannot be granted, due to the great variety of manufacturers and models. Make sure you chose a Bluetooth receiver that features BROADCOM-WIDECOMM components (the most widespread). Some of the off-the-shelf receivers may also perform slower than the MyRay Bluetooth Dongle.

12. flexibility of the exposure settings SENSITIVITY MODE - very low x-ray dose per image - dose 3 to 4 lower than F-speed films RESOLUTION MODE same exposure as F-speed films - best resolution -

13. simple access to the preferences At installation time or during the acquisition, it is possible to set the preferences, such as: - enable the image preview,- select sensibility or resolution.

14. new MyRay sensor holders Easier to position. Four color-coded aiming devices with collimating ring. Very simple assembly.

15. Wireless Competitors Satelec / SoproSopix Bluetooth OwandyKrystal-X WiFi

16. Satelec / Sopro – Sopix Wireless PROs:-similar to the WDS concept CONs: -sensor not protected by FOP* -no display: difficult multi-sensor and multi-op handling -no charging base *FOP - Fiber Optics Plate

17. Not just sensor name status and transmission the display is indispensablefor controlling the multi-op activity:it shows every instant which computer is the sensor connected to, and the acquisition status. battery level computer name

18. tech insight without FOP with FOP the FiberOptics Plate • widely adopted in Radiology • two main benefits: • it protects the CCD from direct x-ray exposure • it eliminates the scattering of light generated by the scintillating layer • the sensors without FOP are thinner, but they cannot achieve the same resolution (Lp/mm) nor the same life expectation of those with FOP

19. Owandy – Krystal-x WiFi PROs:-WiFi fast transmission CONs: -bulky heavy electronics* -prone to wireless interference -wide range only (30 to 50 m.) -one sensor size only 34x24 (#2) *WiFi has demanding battery requirements

20. tech insight Bluetooth vs. WiFi • Security and interference* • Bluetooth wireless technology is the most secure and robust short range wireless technology available today for PAN**, with fast frequency hopping that efficiently battles interference in dense user environments with many overlapping networks. • Bluetooth wireless technology has excellent authentication and built in security. • Wi-Fi can have maximum three overlapping network before you start to experience severe interference and bandwidth reduction. • Wi-Fi uses 22 static channelswhich need to be manually reconfigured vs. Bluetooth wireless technology automatically “reconfigures” for optimum channel usage over the entire available spectrum. • *both WiFi and Bluetooth wireless technologies operate in the unlicensed, 2.4 GHz ISM band (i.e. cordless phones operate in the 2.4 GHz spectrum). • **peripheral area network

21. tech insight Bluetooth vs. WiFi Bluetooth wireless technology uses a fifth of the power compared to Wi-Fi, which is crucial for small battery operated devices. Wi-Fi is best suited for WLAN* devices with a power cord or large battery. *Wireless Local Area Network

22. exposure time in seconds 0,080 0,060 0,050 0,060 0,040 0,050 0,060 0,400 0,240 0,180 0,180 0,120 0,180 0,240 patient safety first • Side by side comparison of the dose required by: • MyRay WDS • Kodak RVG6000 Why giving 3-4 times more dose if you can choose?