240 likes | 627 Views
HRM and Performance. MGTO 231. PERFOR-MANCE. Can HRM improve Firm Performance?. [HR leaders are] “unable to describe their contribution to value added except in trendy, unquantifiable and wannabe terms…” .
E N D
HRM and Performance MGTO 231
Can HRM improve Firm Performance? [HR leaders are] “unable to describe their contribution to value added except in trendy, unquantifiable and wannabe terms…” Source: Stewart, T. (1996), Taking on the Last Bureaucracy, Fortune, 133(1), p. 105.
Can HRM improve Firm Performance? • Strategic HRM (SHRM): Yes! HRM practices can be useful strategically and can help the firm achieve a competitive advantage.
Resource Based View (RBV) • According to the RBV, firms can achieve a competitive advantage if they have the best PEOPLE on board. • These people should have KSAOs that are: • Rare • Hard to imitate • Valuable • Lack of substitutes • However, RBV is a highly abstract idea that provides little practical guidance for HRM (nor for HRM researchers)
HRM Functions and Performance • The more extensive recruitment and selection procedures the higher firm profits (Terpstra & Rozell, 1993) • Link between adoption of training programs and financial performance (Russell et al., 1985) • Using performance appraisal and incentive pay leads to higher profitability (Gerhart & Milkovich, 1992) Gerhart, B., & Milkovich, G.T. (1992), Employee compensation: Research and practice. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 3: 481-569. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Russell, J.S., Terborg, J.R., & Powers, M.L. (1985), Organizational performances and organizational level training and support. Personnel Psychology, 38: 849-863. Terpstra, D.E., & Rozell, E.J. (1993), The relationship of staffing practices to organizational level measures of performance. Personnel Psychology, 46: 27-48.
High-Performance Work Systems • Instead of looking at people or the effectiveness of individualHR functions, the HPWS idea focuses on the SYSTEM of HR functions
High-Performance Work Systems Low Turnover Satisfied Workers Lower Costs Interesting Jobs Low Absenteeism Higher Profits High Quality Satisfied Customers Higher Sales High Innovation Knowledge Sharing Greater Productivity
Teamwork and Empowerment Knowledge Sharing Job Satisfaction … And Ethics Conditions that Contribute to High Performance
A popular way to empower employees is to establish self managing work teams Bring together a variety of knowledge Feeling of being part of a team may improve job satisfaction and output quality Managers need to provide support, open communication, and resources Teamwork and Empowerment
Knowledge Sharing • Learning organization – an organization in which people continually expand their capacity to achieve the results they desire. • Continuous learning – refers to each employee’s and each group’s efforts to gather information and apply the information to their decisions. • A learning culture is an organizational culture in which learning is rewarded, promoted, and supported by manager and organizational objectives.
Knowledge Sharing • Knowledge Management at Hewlett Packard “If only HP knew, what HP knows!” • Solutions implemented at HP.
Test Your Knowledge • Charlotte is a manager overseeing the work of a team. Which of the following behaviors would empower the team the least? • Opening lines of communication between the team and other groups within the organization. • Directing the team and monitoring their day-to-day activities. • Ensure the team has the resources they need. • Keep the team informed as new, relevant information becomes available.
People are satisfied with their jobs when they find them fulfilling and allow them to fulfill important values Occupational intimacy occurs when employees Are fully engaged in their work Care about their coworkers Find their work meaningful Job Satisfaction
Practical Aspects of a HPWS • Extensive staffing procedure • Self-managed teams • Decentralized decision making • Extensive training • Flexible work assignments • Open communication • Incentive pay
Strong Evidence or Just Another Buzzword? • Strong evidence that shows that implementation of a HPWS is associated with: • Perceptions of higher firm performance (Delaney & Huselid, 1996) • Actual firm profits (Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995) Delaney, J.T., & Huselid, M.A. (1996), The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969. Guthrie, J.P. (2001), High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 180-190. Huselid, M.A. (1995), The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38(3): 635-672.
Implementing a HPWS • Difficult to achieve in an already existing organizations (for reasons mentioned in previous two sessions). • Easier to use as a model when setting up a new affiliate/branch/factory.
Test Your Knowledge • The HR director of a medium-sized corporation spends 90% of his time meeting and working with fellow HR staff. He is primarily concerned with ensuring the company meets all legal requirements with regard to HR activities. This HR director: • Is a major contributor to a high-performance organization • Has a strategic focus • Is concerned with customer satisfaction • Has limited the utility and value he could bring to the organization
In Sum • Human Resource Management should not be seen purely as a cost center • Human Resource Management can make a valuable contribution to firm performance. • Estimates are that a 1 s.d. improvement in the HR system will increase the firm’s performance by 10-20%
Administrative Issues • Immediate feedback will be given on presentations but grades will be published after the last presentation. • After final course grades have been published you have one (1) week to make a rebuttal. • Only well-argued rebuttals will be considered.
Administrative Issues • Bring PRS handsets to presentation sessions • Specific recommendations are the most important part of the presentation (and final report)…this is what the company would pay you for. • In the presentation, you tell the audience what you will be advising the company • Use the opportunity for peer evaluation (starts next week).