210 likes | 626 Views
Chapter 5 Recent perspectives on the role of previously known languages. The evolution of the L1 in SLA:Contrastive analysis (chapter 3)Error analysis (chapter 3)Mentalist perspectivesCognitive perspectivesPsychotypology. Chapter 5. What do morpheme order studies tell us (Dulay
E N D
1. SLA Review Session Chapters 5-8
March 3, 2006
2. Chapter 5 Recent perspectives on the role of previously known languages
The evolution of the L1 in SLA:
Contrastive analysis (chapter 3)
Error analysis (chapter 3)
Mentalist perspectives
Cognitive perspectives
Psychotypology
3. Chapter 5 What do morpheme order studies tell us (Dulay & Burt 1973, etc.; Bailey, Madden & Krashen 1974) ?
--favor mental processes in SLA, lack of importance of NL
4. Chapter 5 Cognitive view of language learning (Kellerman, 1979)
--the learners perception of the L1-L2 differences/similarities are more important than the actual differences/similarities
5. Chapter 5 Learner psychotypology
-- learners categorize language data along a continuum from language-neutral to language-specific
6. Chapter 5 Cross-linguistic Interference (Kellerman & Sharwood Smith, 1986) vs. Transfer
--a broader term, including transfer, avoidance, language loss, rate of learning
7. Chapter 6 SLA and linguistics Two approaches to language universals:
--typological universals (Greenberg 1963)
--universal grammar (chapter 7)
8. Chapter 6 Why is the study of language universals important to that of SLA?
-- both NL and IL are natural systems
-- Interlanguage Structural Conformity Hypothesis:
All universals that are true for primary languages are also true for interlanguages. (Eckman, Moravcsik, & Wirth, 1989)
9. Chapter 6 What is the aim of the study of typological universals?
--aims to discover similarities/differences in languages around the world
--to determine what types of languages are possible
10. Chapter 6 Markedness Differential Hypothesis (Eckman, 1977)
--unmarked structures are easier to learn/acquire than marked
11. Chapter 7 Universal Grammar Nativist approach
--general nativism: there is no specific mechanism designed for language learning
--special nativism (UG): posit special principles for language learning that are unique to language and not used in other cognitive endeavors
12. Chapter 7 Motivation of UG
--the uniformly successful and speedy acquisition of language by children in spite of insufficient input
13. Chapter 7 What does UG consist of?
--principles that characterize core grammars of all natural languages
--parameters that vary across languages
14. Chapter 7 Kinds of evidence
positive evidence: comes from the input, set of well-formed utterances
negative evidence: information telling the learner that the utterance is incorrect or impossible (direct, indirect)
15. Chapter 7 Fundamental Difference Hypothesis:
--L1 and L2 acquisition are fundamentally different
--adult L2 learners do not have access to UG
--what they know of language universals is constructed through their NL
16. Chapter 7 Access to UG hypothesis
full transfer/partial (or no) access
no transfer/full access
full transfer/full access
partial transfer/full access
partial transfer/partial access
17. Question: What is the weakness of UG when applied to second language acquisition?
--concerned with syntax, not semantics, pragmatics and discourse
--social and psychological variables are ignored
--methodology relies too much on grammaticality judgment tests (Mitchell, 1998)
18. Chapter 8 Looking at interlanguage processes
Linguistic perspective:
emphasis on constraints on grammar formation
Psychological (cognitive) perspective:
emphasis on the actual mechanisms involved in SLA as well as on issues of working memory and parsing
Sociolinguistic perspective:
emphasis on external social and contextual variables
19. Chapter 8 Competition Model (Bates & MacWhinney, 1982):
--a performance model, not a competence model
--assumes form and function are inseparable
--learners first resort to their NL interpretation strategies
20. Chapter 8 Krashens Monitor Model:
acquisition vs. learning
(subconscious, conscious)
Comprehensible input i+1
language that is heard/read that is slightly ahead of a learners current state of knowledge
21. Question: What are the differences between UG-based and cognitive approach?
--human beings to be endowed with a language-specific module in the mind; human mind is geared to the processing of all kinds of information
--competence; performance
--language; learning
22. Thanks for your attention!
Different approaches/theories to SLA