150 likes | 766 Views
Introduction. Assessing costs of criminal activity is important for economic evaluation of addiction treatment and crime prevention programsExisting crime cost resources are few in number and outdatedMethods inconsistent; disparate crime and cost data sourcesUpdated crime cost estimates needed to estimate economic benefits of reduced criminal activityInform policy about prudent resource allocation decisions for programs addressing addiction, crime prevention, and private security.
E N D
1. The Cost of Crime to Society: New Crime-Specific Estimates for Policy and Program Evaluation Kathryn E. McCollister, Ph.D.
University of Miami
2. Introduction Assessing costs of criminal activity is important for economic evaluation of addiction treatment and crime prevention programs
Existing crime cost resources are few in number and outdated
Methods inconsistent; disparate crime and cost data sources
Updated crime cost estimates needed to estimate economic benefits of reduced criminal activity
Inform policy about prudent resource allocation decisions for programs addressing addiction, crime prevention, and private security
3. Background Previous efforts to estimate impact of crime
U.S. Department of Justice: criminal activity data
Bureau of Justice Statistics: annual report “Criminal Victimization in the United States”
Department of Health and Human Services: “The Economic Costs to Society of Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Mental Illness”
Mark Cohen (Vanderbilt University), Ted Miller (National Public Services Research Inst.)
Anderson (1999); Wright & Litaker (1996); Bartley (2000); MacMillan (2000)
4. Background (cont.) Rajkumar and French (1997)
Template for current study
First study to calculate cost per offense across broad range of crime categories
Estimated tangible and intangible costs of crime
Applied crime cost estimates to TOPS data to illustrate utility of estimates in conducting benefit-cost analysis
5. Crime and Cost Data Sources 2002 National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)
FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) and National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
BJS reports
Current Population Survey
National Center for Health Statistics
Miller et al. (1996)
Jury Verdict Research (JVR)
6. Methods for Estimating Cost of Crime to Society Combination of cost-of-illness and jury compensation methods used to estimate total cost of crime
Cost-of-illness: tangible costs associated with lost productivity, short-term medical expenses, property damage/loss
Jury compensation: jury award data from personal injury trials used to estimate value of pain and suffering
7. Methods: Tangible Costs Tangible Costs
Victim costs
- Direct costs: medical expenses, cash losses, property theft/damage, lost wages
Risk-of-homicide
- Probability certain offense leads to homicide times mean present value of lifetime earnings
Mental health care costs
- Cost estimates of post-victimization counseling and related services inflated to 2004 dollars from Cohen and Miller (1998)
8. Tangible Costs (cont.) Criminal Justice System Costs
Police protection
Legal and adjudication
Corrections
Crime career costs
Productivity losses incurred by perpetrator
9. Methods: Intangible Costs Pain and suffering
- Calculated for 3 crime categories
Rape/sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault
- Injury data and type of medical treatment received (Miller et al. 1996)
Gunshot wounds, broken bones, bruises, etc.
Overnight hospital stay, home care, other medical care
Lost wages and victims’ medical expenses reported by treatment, per injury/offense (Specials)
- Value of specials subtracted from jury award data (JVR, 2004) to provide ‘pain and suffering’ estimates
10. Intangible Costs (cont.) Corrected Risk-of-Homicide
- Corrected to consider intangible costs associated with murder
- Based on Viscusi & Aldy (2003) value of a statistical life ($6.7 million)
- Probability of homicide for each offense multiplied by new value of life
11. Total Cost of Crime Sum of tangible and intangible costs of crime
Subtracted original risk-of-homicide from measures with corrected risk-of-homicide
Categories with no pain and suffering or corrected risk-of-homicide costs (no intangible cost) have total cost = tangible cost
Intangible costs greatly increase the per-offense societal cost of rape, aggravated assault, and robbery
12. Total Cost of Crime (cont.)
13. Discussion Costing methodology presented here provides comprehensive perspective on crime’s impact on society
Intangible and tangible cost estimates represents different points of view (victim, perpetrator, criminal justice system)
Broad list of criminal offenses estimated
14. Limitations Challenges persist
Lack of uniform data sources
Missing data
Existing studies fragmented, inconsistent
Difficulty quantifying actual number of offenses with some crimes (e.g., drug law violations)
Estimates exclude value of psychological injury
Value of property loss: true cost or transfer of income?
15. Conclusions Understanding economic impact of crime aids policy makers in allocating crime fighting resources
Value of criminal activity important for understanding economic benefits of addiction treatment and crime control strategies
Crime cost estimates show how even modest reductions in certain types of crime can generate substantial economic benefits
Ideally update estimates every 5 years
16. References Anderson, D. A. (1999). The aggregate burden of crime. J. Law Econ. 42: 611-637.
Bartley, W. A. (2000). Valuation of specific crime rates. National Criminal Justice Reference Service: Vanderbilt University School of Economics.
Cohen, M. A., and Miller, T. R. (1998). The cost of mental health care for victims of crime. J. Interpers. Violence 13: 93-110.
Macmillan, R. (2000). Adolescent victimization and income deficits in adulthood: rethinking the costs of criminal violence from a life-course perspective. Criminology 38: 553-580.
Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., and Wiersema, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: a new look. National Institute of Justice Research Report, Washington, D.C.
Rajkumar, A. S., and French, M. T. (1997). Drug abuse, crime costs, and the economic benefits of treatment. J. Quant. Criminol. 13(3): 291-323.
Wright, M. S., and Litaker, D. (1996). Childhood victims of violence: hospital utilization by children with intentional injuries. Arch. Pediat. Adol. Med. 150: 415-420.