1 / 22

VR Context Study Graphs

VR Context Study Graphs. For Jeremy. Abstract. Design. 2 conditions Environment (Speech recognition) Person (Day care supervisor) 2 contexts per condition Read 8 words per context Hear a response to each word Recall word pairs for each context Recognize individual words for each context.

angelica-figueroa
Download Presentation

VR Context Study Graphs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VR Context Study Graphs For Jeremy

  2. Abstract

  3. Design • 2 conditions • Environment (Speech recognition) • Person (Day care supervisor) • 2 contexts per condition • Read 8 words per context • Hear a response to each word • Recall word pairs for each context • Recognize individual words for each context

  4. Environment

  5. Person (Female)

  6. Person (Male)

  7. Round 1 Round 2 Say:Hear Say:Hear house:door nose:face old:death kiss:touch lava:fire lion:teeth rabbit:ears bird:tree arm:foot church:book hit:family woman:skirt water:shark venom:snake flower:stem beetle:wing

  8. Significant results..

  9. Pair recall • Criteria for correct: • Both heard and said word recalled (and recalled as associated to one another) • Had to remember which was said and heard. • Also had to recall which person/environment the pair came from.

  10. Word recall • Criteria: • Single word memory • Did not have to remember pair, who said, or which person/context it came from.

  11. Recall/Recognition as a factor

  12. Retrieval condition as a measure

  13. Non-Significant Resultsof Interest • Overall rate of recall the same in the person and environment conditions. • True when analyzing single word memory, paired word memory. • Undermines explanation that differences in retrieval were due to more “elaboration” in the person condition (if so, there should be a main effect on total recall). • Arousal and peopleness of terms did NOT interact significantly in any analysis.

More Related