1 / 39

The Design of the Power Saving Mechanisms in IEEE 802.16e Networks (Defense)

The Design of the Power Saving Mechanisms in IEEE 802.16e Networks (Defense). Student: Lei Yan ( 嚴雷 ) Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu ( 吳和庭 ) Date: 2009/07/23 Institute of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology. Outlines. Backgrounds and motivation

angelo
Download Presentation

The Design of the Power Saving Mechanisms in IEEE 802.16e Networks (Defense)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Design of the Power Saving Mechanisms in IEEE 802.16e Networks (Defense) Student: Lei Yan (嚴雷) Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu (吳和庭) Date: 2009/07/23 Institute of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology

  2. Outlines • Backgrounds and motivation • Spec-defined power saving mechanism • Proposed power saving mechanism • Performance evaluation • Conclusion and future works

  3. Brief of IEEE 802.16 • Also called “WiMAX” (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access) • The “wireless” last mile technology • Low cost and free to geographical limits • Includes PHY/MAC solutions • Higher transmission rate than 3.5G • Ideal transmission rate and coverage: 75 Mbps and 50 km • Now been merchandised in Taiwan

  4. Layering related to connections • Convergence sublayer • Classification • Common Part sublayer • Establishment • Change • Deletion • Call admission control (CAC) • Bandwidth allocation (BWA) • Packet scheduling • Security sublayer • Encryption/Decryption for data MAC Common Part Sublayer (CPS)

  5. Frame structure of WiMAX

  6. Outlines • Backgrounds and motivation • Spec-defined power saving mechanism • Proposed power saving mechanism • Performance evaluation • Conclusion and future works

  7. Service type Service type for power saving Usage UGS UGS VoIP ertPS ERTVR VoIP (silence suppression) rtPS RTVR MPEG nrtPS NRTVR FTP BE BE HTTP Renaming for QoS metrics: Power saving class (PSC)

  8. States of a MS with power saving function

  9. Outlines • Backgrounds and motivation • Spec-defined power saving mechanism • Proposed power saving mechanism • Performance evaluation • Conclusion and future works

  10. What our research work has done? • Includes UGS/ertPS, rtPS, nrtPS, and BE for both UL/DL traffics • Integrated consideration to CENTRALLY arrange calls to prolong sleep durations • Complete solution (CAC + BWA + packet scheduling) • Reduction of ON-OFF alternations in MS • Q: Why packet scheduling for power saving? • A: Since BS can control all states for MS PRECISELY with time

  11. Structure of our research work

  12. Assumptions for our research work • Frame overflow is allowed (to schedule across the bound between frames) • Merge the listening duration into ON-state duration

  13. BWA and scheduling

  14. Judgment in the proposed BWA algorithm • (5) determines the credit. (6) is the stabilized version of (7)

  15. Deployed packet scheduling algorithm • Round-Robin fashion for the scheduling • Pros: In the algorithm itself, all MSs have intact sleep duration (intuitive design) • Cons: No guarantee for UGS/ertPS delay • Special assumption: all delay bounds are set and equal to DUGS (100 ms)

  16. Outlines • Backgrounds and motivation • Spec-defined power saving mechanism • Proposed power saving mechanism • Performance evaluation • Conclusion and future works

  17. System structure of our research work

  18. Parameters for simulation

  19. Parameters for simulation (cont.)

  20. The traditional WiMAX scheme we compare to • No BWA and scheduling (no packet dropping rate/delay) • We amplified the negative credit to reduce packet dropping/delay

  21. Three scenarios for our comparison

  22. Flow chart of the program

  23. Increase of sleeping ratio • Heavier loading causes longer C but reduce number of cycle (number of granting for MSs) => avg. proportion in ON-state is decreased

  24. Scenario 1: AMP=15

  25. Scenario 2: AMP=20

  26. Scenario 3: MS=120

  27. Scenario 4: MS=200

  28. Outlines • Backgrounds and motivation • Spec-defined power saving mechanism • Proposed power saving mechanism • Performance evaluation • Conclusion and future works

  29. Conclusion • Although the power saving based WiMAX scheme introduces packet dropping and delay than the traditional one, the power consumption is decreased • Our proposed WiMAX scheme prolongs sleep duration and decreases ON-OFF alternation for MSs • Proposed BWA + scheduling is better than NO BWA + scheduling in both packet dropping rate and delay • The current judgment for parameters can make MSs sleep at most 15 frames with tolerable packet dropping rate

  30. Future works • Further judgment for parameters to make the packet dropping rate tolerable when AMP=20 • Use the LMS algorithm as substitute for BWA • Implement the other two packet scheduling algorithm for alternative

  31. Thank you!! • Your suggestion is my treasure!!

More Related