1 / 12

Trends in Storage Technologies .

Trends in Storage Technologies . Evangelos Eleftheriou , Robert Haas, Jens Jelitto , Mark A. Lantz, Haralampos Pozidis . IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 33(4): 4-13 (2010). Presented by: Emery Mizero Computer Science Department March 7 th , 2011. 0. Outline. Motivation HDD and Trend

angelo
Download Presentation

Trends in Storage Technologies .

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Trends in Storage Technologies. EvangelosEleftheriou, Robert Haas, Jens Jelitto, Mark A. Lantz, HaralamposPozidis. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 33(4): 4-13 (2010) Presented by: Emery MizeroComputer Science Department March 7th, 2011

  2. 0. Outline • Motivation • HDD and Trend • Tape and Trend • SCM technology • SCM Devices • Conclusion • References

  3. 1. Motivation • Diverse Workloads • Requires specialized system architecture • High performance • Growing Data • Automation • Decision Making

  4. 2. HDD and Trend • Perpendicular recording • Up to 1Tb/in2 (Current high: 803Gb/in2) • Physical limitations • Scaling the size of a bit level cell • Rotational rate (5400 – 15000rpms) • Latency

  5. 2.1 HDD Performance • Look atBandwidth and Latency Source: Current Paper

  6. 3. Tape and Trend • Scale • Increase capacity per in2 • Highest observed: 29.5 Gb/in2 • LTFS (Linear Table File System) • Portable

  7. 4. SCM Technology • Non-volatility • Solid-state implementation • Low write/read latency • High endurance (above 28 – 212 cycles) • Low cost per bit • Scalable for future technology

  8. 4.1 SCM Technology (…) Source: R.F. Freitas et al. [1]

  9. 5. SCM Candidate Devices • None yet… • Flash SSDs do not make it. • Under Construction • PCM • Spin-torque Transfer Memory (STTRAM) • Nanoionic memories • Ferroelectric memories (FeRAM)

  10. 5.1 SCM Candidates Devices Number of Papers Presented in two conferences: Symposium on VLSI Technology and the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) Source: G. W. Burr et al.. [2]

  11. 6. Conclusion • Memory will scale to growing processing memory requirements by diverse workloads. • There is future for tape in the memory hierarchy. (Will scale to the digital storage demand)

  12. 7. References [1] R. F. Freitas and W. W. Wilcke. Storage-Class Memory: The Next Storage System Technology. IBM J. Res. Develop. 52 (4/5), 439–447 (2008). [2] GW Burr et al. Overview of Candidate Device Technologies for Storage-Class Memory. IBM J. Res. Develop. 52 (4/5), 449–464 (2008). [3] http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080930/158806/, Visited 3-2-11

More Related