100 likes | 220 Views
System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs. Satoru Hori, Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata, Masahiro Morikura NTT hori@ansl.ntt.co.jp. Approach to 100 Mbps WLAN. PHY Layer Requirements for Next Generation WLAN - Data rate above 100 Mbps - Enough cell radius
E N D
System capacity and cell radius comparison with several high data rate WLANs Satoru Hori, Yasuhiko Inoue, Tetsu Sakata, Masahiro Morikura NTT hori@ansl.ntt.co.jp
Approach to 100 Mbps WLAN PHY Layer Requirements for Next Generation WLAN - Data rate above 100 Mbps - Enough cell radius - Large system capacity Comparison between several candidates - Extension of IEEE 802.11a - Data rate of 108 Mbit/s (twice as 54 Mbit/s in IEEE 802.11a)
Four candidates extending IEEE 802.11 a A: double clock rate clock rate of the system is twice as fast as that of IEEE 802.11 a e.g. clock rate: 20 MHz 40 MHz B: double sub-carrier numbers number of sub-carriers is twice as many as that of IEEE 802.11 a e.g. 52 sub-carriers 104 sub-carriers C: 4096 QAM-OFDM increasing the number of bits in M-ary QAM on each sub-carrier e.g. 64 QAM 4096 QAM D: OFDM/SDM (multi-carrier MIMO) system using multiple transmit and receive antennas each antenna transmit different data to increase transmit data rate e.g. 2 transmit antennas and 2 receive antennas Reference A. van Zelst, R. van Nee, and G. A. Awater, “Space Division Multiplexing (SDM) for OFDM systems,” Proc. IEEE VTC2000-spring, vol. 2, pp.1070-1074, May 2000. P.Vandenameele, L. V. D.Perre, M. G. E.engels, B. Gyselinckx, and H. J. D. Man, “A Combined OFDM/SDMA Approach,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, Nov. 2000.
Parameters of each system A: double clock rate B: double sub-carriers C: 4096 QAM- OFDM D: OFDM/ SDM Data rate 108 Mbit/s 108 Mbit/s 108 Mbit/s 108 Mbit/s Band width 33.1 MHz 33.1 MHz 16.6 MHz 16.6 MHz 6 channels (USA) 6 channels (USA) 12 channels (USA) 12 channels (USA) Number of channels 52 104 52 52 Number of sub-carriers 2 ms symbol length 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms GI length 400 ns 800 ns 800 ns 800 ns Mod. scheme 64 QAM 64 QAM 4096 QAM 64 QAM receiver : 2 (diversity) receiver : 2 (diversity) transmitter : 2 receiver : 2 Number of antennas receiver : 2 (diversity)
Cell Radius Calculation d = (l / 4p) 10(Lp /10 a) [m] Lp = Pt + Gt + Gr - Pr [dB] Pr = Np + Cr + Df [dBm] Np = Nf + 10log10(kBwT) + 30 [dBm] d : cell radius l : wave length ( = c/f = 0.0576923 [m] for 5.2GHz ) a : propagation loss coefficient Lp : allowed propagation loss Pt , Pr : transmit power and required received power, respectively Gt, Gr : the gain of transmit antenna and receive antenna, respectively (was assumed to be 0 dBi) Np : noise power Nf : noise figure of the receiver (was assumed to be 7 dB) Df : degradation due to various factors (was assumed to be 6 dB) Bw : bandwidth of signals T : temperature (was assumed to be 300 K) k : Boltzman coefficient (= 1.38 * 10-23 [J/K] ) Cr : required CNR to realize PER of 1%
Cell space Interference area System Capacity Calculation Th=(R * h * Nch)/C=3sqrt(3) * Nch * R * h/(2p * 102CIR/10a) Th : Maximum throughput R : data rate of PHY layer ( = 108 Mbit/s) h : MAC efficiency for throughput (was assumed to be 1.0) Nch : Number of channels ( = 12 for 20MHz band width and 6 for 40MHz band width ) (Lower, Middle and Upper UNII bands) C : Cluster size ( = Interference area / Cell space ) CIR : Required CIR to achieve PER of 1%
0 10 B:double sub-carriers C: 4096 QAM-OFDM -1 10 D: OFDM/SDM PER -2 10 A:double clock rate -3 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CNR [dB] Required CNR Data rate 108 Mbit/s Packet size 64 byte Exponentially decaying Rayleigh fading (delay spread 100 ns) No space correlation Ideal synchronization Ideal channel estimation FEC coding rate = 3/4 constraint length = 7 5 bit soft-decision diversity (A, B, C) Maximum ratio combining
0 10 A:double clock rate C: 4096 QAM-OFDM -1 10 PER -2 10 D: OFDM/SDM B:double sub-carriers -3 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 CIR [dB] Required CIR Data rate 108 Mbit/s Packet size 64 byte Exponentially decaying Rayleigh fading (delay spread 100 ns) No space correlation Ideal synchronization Ideal channel estimation FEC coding rate = 3/4 constraint length = 7 5 bit soft-decision diversity (A, B, C) Maximum ratio combining
Performance Comparison A: double clock rate B: double sub-carriers C: 4096 QAM- OFDM D: OFDM / SDM Required CNR 19.5 dB 18.8 dB 36.1 dB 29.2 dB Transmit power 13 dBm 13 dBm 13 dBm 13 dBm Propagation loss coefficient a 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 11.4 m 12.0 m 4.1 m 6.9 m Cell radius Required CIR 20.3 dB 20.0 dB 37.2 dB 29.8 dB Cluster size 24.7 23.6 303.7 101.2 System capacity 26.4 Mbit/s 27.6 Mbit/s 4.2 Mbit/s 12.9 Mbit/s
Conclusion Systems with 40 MHz band width (A and B) - CNR and CIR are pragmatic. - Total number of channels is one half of that of IEEE 802.11 a. e.g. 6 channels in USA, only 2 channels in Japan Systems with 20 MHz band width (C and D) - Total number of channels is same as that of IEEE 802.11 a. - CNR and CIR must be improved significantly.