80 likes | 260 Views
600,000 Year Ice Core Correlations of CO2 and Temperature. Bill Scott Lyncean Group, Feb 24, 2010. Purpose. Present the remarkable data correlation between temperature and greenhouse gasses. Briefly discuss the feedbacks that could be causing this correlation.
E N D
600,000 Year Ice Core Correlations of CO2 and Temperature Bill Scott Lyncean Group, Feb 24, 2010
Purpose • Present the remarkable data correlation between temperature and greenhouse gasses. • Briefly discuss the feedbacks that could be causing this correlation. • Express my skepticism of fully understanding this equilibrium. • Relate to the risk of continuing our reliance on fossil fuels.
dO18 as Temperature Proxy • O18 heavier by 2 neutrons • O18 is about 0.2% of O16 • O18 needs more energy to evaporate • Higher average ocean temperature increases O18 in air • And increases O18 in all precipitation • Measurable in layers of ice cores to 800,000 years • Measurable in limestone to 2 billion years • CO2 data are independent measurements of gas trapped in bubbles in the ice layers • Independent correlated data are important
Vostok Ice Core, Methane also correlated Nature, Vol.388, p.431, 3 June 1999, Maccabee Lyncean
Feedbacks CO2, CH4, and dO18 • Greenhouse effect • CO2 and CH4 trap heat by transmitting sun’s energy, but absorbing earth reradiated energy • CO2 and CH4 increase temperature • Evaporation effect • Increased temperature evaporates CO2 from the ocean • Biological effects • Temperature increases plant and animal life • Plants convert CO2 to O2 • Animals convert O2 to CO2 and methane • Death produces methane
Conclusions • Correlation of CO2 and dO18 is significant and important. It should not be discounted. • Even though correlation doesn’t prove causality, it suggests feedbacks that are in equilibrium • Greenhouse effect doesn’t explain the methane correlation • Three or multi way correlations are more complicated • Perhaps uncalculable • Biological and evaporation effects may be as or more significant than the greenhouse effect • Deforestation and desertification may be as or more important than fossil fuel consumption.
Our fossil fuel consumption is a risk • Adding CO2 disrupts the equilibrium • Past performance is no surety of the future • But temperature increase would be a good bet • Other risks • Pollutants • Economics • Benefits of cheap energy vs the cost of our cash flow • When do we deplete our fossil energy?