300 likes | 473 Views
Summary. Overview of sectorOur National ApproachQLD Equal Pay CaseHeads of AgreementEqual Remuneration CaseThe case processWhat it all means. Overview of sector. Non government Social and Community Services sector (SACS) in all States and TerritoriesASU largest union in sectorMajority State/
E N D
1. Social Community and Disability Services Equal Remuneration CaseAn Update for ASU National Conference
Linda White
Assistant National Secretary
Australian Services Union
2. Summary Overview of sector
Our National Approach
QLD Equal Pay Case
Heads of Agreement
Equal Remuneration Case
The case process
What it all means
3. Overview of sector Non government Social and Community Services sector (SACS) in all States and Territories
ASU largest union in sector
Majority State/Federal Government funded – some philanthropic funding
Sector critical to Australia’s social cohesion
4. Overview of sector History of battles for industrial legislation – 1983 – CYSS case went to High Court for award and industrial coverage
1983 – graduate rate = independent school teacher – now gap $20k - $25k
Highly feminised
80%+ female
5. Overview of sector Governments outsource work through tendering
Sector – small organisations, large charities, some for profit – most not for profit
Few national organisations – churches, charities and peak organisations not IR focussed
Unsophisticated IR – Limited bargaining – Award reliant
6. Overview of Sector Workforce – female, ageing, part time
Low wages compared to equivalents
Next 15 years expect to lose between 10-40% workforce through retirement
Industry expanding – 2.8% per year – faster than health
7. Our National Approach ASU determined need national approach
Same issues across Australia – workforce, governments, funding, lack of bargaining
Wage gap profound and hard to make up
Regular strategy meetings and discussions between Branches and Nationally – key to our plan – coordination, information swapping, building our power
8. Our National Approach April 2007 – Time to set scene
Report
Survey
Get Organised
Lobbying
Working with sector
9. Our National Approach Fair Work Act, Trading Corporations and Award Modernisation = challenge and opportunities
10. Our National Approach Submissions to 20 plus of inquiries at State, Federal level raising our workforce issues-including productivity commissions
Qld part in plan – Qld State Award (April 2008) and Equal Pay Case (Nov 2008) and decision (May 2009)
11. May 2009-success-inceases range from 18% to 37% depending on classification
Implemented over 3 year period and State wage case decisions also apply
Qld government has made available some funding to pay the increases
Massive victory – 2 fronts
Some issues remain QLD Equal Pay Case
12. National Lobbying ASU goes to Canberra
12 & 13 September 2007
1-3 September 2008
21-23 June 2010
Election Pledge
13. Heads of Agreement New government wanted one system – we wanted equal pay everywhere
SACS rates and jobs same in all States
Choice – State by State and Federally because mixture of coverage
14. Heads of Agreement ASU agreement with the Commonwealth struck 30/10/09
Support for Equal Remuneration Case
Qld principles – NSW jurisprudence
Resourcing and research
Qld protected
Phase in – 4 ˝ years – 6 months stay before commencement
Everyone in one system (except WA)
15. Equal Remuneration Case Signing Heads of Agreement was the easy part
Bigger than Ben Hur
Involves ACTU, HSU, LHMU, AWU, AEU
New application – no cases for 13+ years Federally
All 16 cases previously under Federal law – none successful
16. Equal Remuneration Case S.302
Fair Work Act provides for Equal Remuneration Orders – equal or comparable value
17. The case process S.302 Fair Work Act
Need to establish the types of factors to be addressed in assessing value of work performed by women – look at Award histories, occupation segregation and demographics
Relevant industry comparators – are male comparators necessary?
Expert witnesses – industry/pay equity, workplace, economic, qualifications – 5
Worker statements and evidence – 40+
Union Officials – 11
18. The case process Experts
Professor Gabrielle Meagher – Uni of Sydney
Valuation of caring professions, history
Anne Junor – Spotlight skills recognition framwork
Associate Professor Siobhan Austen – Curtin Uni
Participation of women in workforce, effect of undervaluation on participation and effect of increasing wages in economy
Meg Smith – Uni of Western Sydney
Extensive research in gender equity and the undervaluation of feminised work
Robin Flynn – CSHISC
Skills Framework
19. The case process Claim same as in Queensland re: rates – no discount for salary packaging
Close as possible to Qld classification structure – integration of disability classifications
Looked at remuneration issues – extra claim for improved sleepover provisions based on NSW case for similar work
20. The Case Process – Timetable Our submissions and witness statements are done
Most employers, peaks and State Government are done – all supportive except Mission Australia
Timetable changed because of election and uncertainty dragged out original timetable
Commonwealth and ACTU-file by 5th November 2010
Employer orgs like AFEI, ABI, ACCI – 3rd December 2010 in response
What these bodies say is very important
21. The Case Process - Timetable 10 days of inspection – 6-16th September
Hearing in Jan/Feb 2011 – 31st January – 1-4th February, 7-11th February
Written submissions – 28 March 2011 and 12th April 2011
Wanted finished by December 2010 because of modern award phase in – not possible.
22. Significant legal costs
Staff time
Members witnesses time A Serious Investment
23. The case process Ambitious – not just occupation but class of work
Cannot underestimate opposition
On average Australian women are paid 18% less than men – gap widening – work 66 extra days
Can’t just be about legal case
Reignite the issue – Equal Pay Alliance, mainstream – change focus – Marie Claire, Women’s Day
24. What it all means Valuing the work
10.2 In order to ensure that not-for-profits can sustain their workforces, and as wages are a major factor in the successful recruitment and retention of staff, Australian governments purchasing community services need to base funding on relevant market wages for equivalent positions. Costings need to take into account the skill sets required to perform the purchased services and be indexed appropriately to market wage growth within that industry sector.
Contribution of the Not-for-Profit Sector, Productivity Commission Report – January 2010
25. Campaigning Nationally It’s about growing power and recognising we have power and not stopping because of the legal case
26. Funding Funding of outcome – most important
Qld and Victoria Governments have committed
Elections need to be used to pressure
Will need to immediately unite and fight if necessary after decision
27. Not just about SACS It’s about women and equal pay
On average Australian women are paid 18% less than men
Women must work 66 days more than men on average for the same income
28. Not just about SACS We need to make this whole of union response
Send a post card
Email www.payup.org.au
Opportunity to be part of HISTORY
30. Contacts and action Linda White: lwhite@asu.asn.au
ASU Website: www.asu.asn.au
twitter.com/ASUnion
twitter.com/payupequalpay
www.payup.org.au
Facebook
“Pay Up - No More Lip Service to Equal Pay”