600 likes | 621 Views
Guidelines and factors for successful NIV implementation in ARF, identifying patients, when to stop NIV, and predictors of failure. Importance of patient selection, monitoring, and when to consider ETI. Location guidance and staff familiarity for effective NIV use in hospitals.
E N D
Consigli durante la NIV M Vitacca Divisione di Pneumologia Fondazione S.Maugeri Lumezzane (BS) Italy
Severe ARF Severity Mild To moderate Not established TO AVOID ETI TO PREVENT ALTERNATIVE to ETI Meaning of NIV use
IDENTIFY PATIENTS (according to location ?) 1. Clinical abnormalities - moderate to severe dyspnea - RR > 24 b/min in COPD - RR > 30 – 35 b/min in AHRF - accessory muscle use, paradoxal breathing 2. Gas exchange abnormalities - PaCO2 > 45 mmHg, pH < 7.35 - PaO2/FiO2 < 250 mmHg Am J Respir Crit Care M d 2001; 163: 283-291; Intensive Care Medicine 2001; 27: 166-178
COPD CHF/CPE PNA Asthma OHS NMD UAO post-op post-extub trauma ARDS MOF IPF Tight UAO
WEAK COUGH AND HYPER-SECRETIONS • SEVERE ENCEPHALOPATHY • INTOLERANCE AND AGITATION • PATIENT-VENTILATORY ASYNCHRONIES • EXCESSIVE LEAKS • DISCOMFORT • SLEEP DISTURBANCES • HYPERGLICAEMIA • LOW ADLs • POOR RESPONSE OF ABG AND RR • HIGH SCORES OF SEVERITY OF ILLNESS NEED OF ETI: range → 5-60% Courtesy of dott Scala
BTS Guideline of NIMV in ARF Thorax 2002; 57: 192-211 Time to stop NIV for failure • no improvement or deterioration in consciousness • no improvement in ABG • severe complications • severe pneumonia on chest X-ray • 2° intrahospital failure with necessity of NIV • copiuos secretion • more than 18 continous hours of NIV for more than 4 days • nasal bridge erosion • intolerance to ventilator
Perchè fallisce la NIV ? Perchè si sbaglia paziente Perchè non si rispettono le controindicazioni Perchè si sbaglio maschera Perchè si sbaglio modalità di ventilazione Perchè si sbaglio il settaggio Perchè il paziente non supporta più la NIV Perchè non miglioranono i gas Perchè vi è cattiva interazione con il ventilatore Perchè dà un senso di falsa sicurezza
FATTORI PREDITTIVI PER IL FALLIMENTO DELLA NIV IN SOGGETTI CON INSUFFICIENZA RESPIRATORIA. A) Ipossiemici Ipercapnici Età Basso punteggio del livello di dipendenza misurato con scala ADL (activity daily life) Iperglicemia Presenza di polmonite come causa di insufficienza respiratoria acuta (IRA) Alto punteggio di gravità prognostica (alto APACHE II score all’ ammissione) Paziente incosciente, non collaborante Severa ipercapnia (paCO2 > 90 mmHg) Severa acidosi (pH a < 7.10) Mancanza di miglioramento (entro 1-2 h) degli scambi gassosi, frequenza cardiaca e respiratoria Paziente ipersecretivo Presenza di encefalopatia Intolleranza alla VMN Perdite di flusso dalla maschera Caduta della pressione arteriosa
FATTORI PREDITTIVI PER IL FALLIMENTO DELLA NIV IN SOGGETTI CON INSUFFICIENZA RESPIRATORIA. B) Ipossiemici Normocapnici Età Alto punteggio di gravità prognostica (alto SAPS II score all’ ammissione) ARDS e polmonite come causa del ricovero Edema polmonare cardiogeno senza risposta alla terapia medica Mancato miglioramento della ossigenazione dopo VMN (1-2 h) Paziente ipersecretivo Presenza di encefalopatia Intolleranza alla VMN
Be carefull ! NON INVASIVE RESPIRATORY SUPPORT IN HYPOXIEMIC ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE ? • High percentage of failures • Late resolution • Difficult “invasive” diagnostic procedures (BAL, Brush) • Risk to delay ETI Take care of: • Accurate selection of the patients: - PaO2/FiO2 > 150 mmHg, - Lobar densities at chest X- Ray or CT - Absence of hemodynamic shock (BE > -2.5 mEq/L) • Empiric Antibiotic Treatment (Protocols !) • Non invasive fast diagnostic tests (Urinary antigens, etc.) • Hemocoltures • Don’t push to hard (stop NIV if PaO2/FiO2< 150 at 1-2 hrs)
BTS Equipment Recommendations Staff familiarity is key to success
Timing is all… • Start early but not too early (Barbe study) • You are too late if… • Pt on verge of respiratory arrest • Pt severely hypoxaemic (PaO2/FiO2 < 75) • Pt comatose or hugely agitated • Medically unstable: acute MI, GI bleed, shock • What is your unit’s ‘door to mask’ time? • What are the main limitations? Simonds ERS school
Reasons for low use of NIV in acute hospitals: US survey No. of responses 20 10 0 Poor previous experience Hospital staff inadequately trained Equipment not appropriate Physicians lack of experience Other Maheshwari v et al Chest 2006:129: 1226-33
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 185, Iss. 2, pp 152–159, Jan 15, 2012 H admissions pts from NIV to EI N° pts NIV deaths
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 185, Iss. 2, pp 152–159, Jan 15, 2012 NIV and EI EI NIV no EI No support
Monitoring: readyaccessto ETI and CPR Courtesy of dott Scala
Ventilatory Monitoring • Respiratory pattern • Pt-ventinteraction • Availabilityof ETI • in case of NIV failure Courtesy of dott Scala
Monitoring • Clinical status, respiratory rate, heart rate, dyspnoea score, secretion clearance • Pulse oximetry • Continuous display of ECG and non-invasive BP • Arterial blood gases (ABG machine easily accessed) • Continuous non-invasive monitoring of CO2 helpful eg. Transcutaneous, end-tidal • Duration of NIV use • Ventilatory settings, FiO2, leak • Severity score • Side effects : skin integrity, GI, nasal symptoms • CXR, screening bloods etc. Simonds ERS school
100 – 75 % 49 -25 % 24 -0 % 74 -50 % Percentage of patients who fail NIV Eur Respir J 2005; 25:348-355
Ventilatory Monitoring • Respiratory pattern • Pt-ventinteraction • Availabilityof ETI • in case of NIV failure
YOU HAVE……. A VENTILATOR HAS NO BRAIN, BUT NEEDS TO COUPLE TWO BRAINS !
Apparently there is nothing wrong on what you see on the ventilator With S. Navacourtesy
But if you could see the neural activity of the patient….. With S. Navacourtesy
25 0 Ineffective effort Pao Pes 20 0 Sforzi inefficaci
Un eccesso di supporto Con la cortesia del dott. Polese
Totale desincronizzazione durante PSV Con la cortesia del dott. Polese
Totale desincronizzazione durante PSV (perdite) Con la cortesia del dott. Polese
Flow (l/sec) Vent. rate = 12 b/min Paw (cmH2O) Fr = 33 b/min Pes (cmH2O) 5 sec Time (sec) Triggering delay= Ineffective effort Georgopoulos et al. Intensive Care Med 2006
Autotriggering Paw (cmH2O) 1) Low threshold for triggering 2) Dirt circuit 3) leaks Flow (l/sec) Pes (cmH2O) Time (sec) With ERS courtesy
Flow Paw Pga Pes Pdi Expiratory asynchrony With ERS courtesy
Ventilatory Monitoring • Respiratory pattern • Pt-ventinteraction • Availabilityof ETI • in case of NIV failure
Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2001 Feb;163(2):540-77 Almost all the side effects of NIV are due to problems with interfaces
80-100% Air Leaks
Types of Leaks Intentionalleaks Courtesy of dott Scala
Look for a balance betweenleaks and comfort Courtesy of dott Scala
Interface rotation strategy Conti G et al. RespirMed 2007; 52:1463-71 Girault C et al. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:124-31 Courtesy of dott Scala