1 / 9

Business Services: The Lanarkshire Experience

Business Services: The Lanarkshire Experience. Presentation to the Local Economic Forum Stakeholders Conference 7th December 2004 Maureen McConachie North Lanarkshire Council. 1st year LEF task on rationalising Business Support Services.

annice
Download Presentation

Business Services: The Lanarkshire Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business Services: The Lanarkshire Experience Presentation to the Local Economic Forum Stakeholders Conference 7th December 2004 Maureen McConachie North Lanarkshire Council

  2. 1st year LEF task on rationalising Business Support Services • LEF established 2001 • Lanarkshire context – Previous long established history of positive partnership and effective working relationships • 1st year LEF task of rationalising Business Support Services • Starting point for task was a major independent research consultation with local businesses to assess current satisfaction levels, service gaps, etc. • Outcome of research:– • little by way of major perceived service gaps; • some confusion over available services; • some confusion on respective roles of economicdevelopment partners

  3. LEF Structure NLP SLP LEF Services to Business Image & Tourism Routes to Inclusion Competitive Place Strategy Monitoring

  4. LEF Structure • Services to Business group chaired by private sector • Input from key public & private partners

  5. Actions to Streamline / Improve Business Services • Some programmes dropped because they were seen to be duplicating (e.g. Management & Training Programmes, Domestic Trade Programmes) • Partnership doesn’t have to mean everyone is involved in everything. (e.g. development of pan-Lanarkshire Property Enquiry Service led by SLC) • Increased consistency across the two council areas (e.g. scope of programmes) • But still scope to reflect different needs/ priorities across distinct communities(e.g. rural more of an issue in South Lanarkshire)

  6. Actions to Streamline / Improve Business Services • Improved communications with businesses:- • Issue highlighted by businesses via research • 6 publications into 1 • Improved quality / consistency of publication / tailored to business needs • Joint funding of new publication • Editorial Committee from key partners • Financial savings made from rationalisation of publications – (c. £50k p.a.) • Ongoing feedback from readership re perceived usefulness

  7. Business Gateway Delivery • 7 Business Gateway delivery agents merged into 1 • Major change - a process that was not without ‘pain’ • But major benefits now being reaped • Improved consistency of delivery across Lanarkshire • Reduced confusion amongst businesses • Reduced overhead costs – c. £350k p.a. savings from BG restructuring alone • Increased focus on frontline delivery. Savings allowed for service enhancements (e.g. enhanced social economy dedicated support within BG) • Increased uptake of services amongst local businesses – A number of output targets actually increased (e.g. Business start-up support 2001/2 = 780 new businesses assisted; 2003/4 = 1,100) • Single contract, involving service level agreement for main funding partners’ programmes

  8. The ‘Lanarkshire model’ • What the partners see as being appropriate for our area • No requirement seen in Lanarkshire for all business support staff to be ‘under one roof’ • But close contact – ‘virtual team’ • Clear parameters re respective roles and priorities of partners • ‘Business’ and ‘Inclusion’ issues linked via LEF structure(e.g. future labour supply issue clearly links to concerns with reducing IB recipients)

  9. Future Considerations • Competitive tender of BG contract • Need to ensure that we don’t potentially risk losing the expertise that has been developed due to short-term cost saving considerations • Potential danger that what has been ‘built up’ could unravel • Overall progress made, but still major challenges in the local economy (e.g. increasing ‘value added’ within SMEs, promoting entrepreneurial culture, addressing worklessness)

More Related