E N D
1. Improving the Performance of Mobile Robots on Uneven Terrain Joseph Auchter
Dr. Carl Moore
FAMU/FSU College of Engineering
5 October 2007
2. Wheeled Mobile Robots Increasing interest in autonomous robots operating outdoors on difficult terrains
3. Wheel Slip for Outdoor Robots All wheeled vehicles will slip on uneven terrain
Two kinds of wheel slip:
Dynamic: due to insufficient friction, terrain deformation, etc
Kinematic: due to lack of an instantaneous center of rotation compatible with all wheels
4. Why Slip Occurs on Uneven Terrain Example: Ideal Ackermann Steering:
5. Why Slip Occurs on Uneven Terrain Ackermann Steering on Uneven Terrain:
6. Problems Caused by Wheel Slip Decreased localization ability due to odometric (wheel encoder) error accumulating without bound
Power wastage
Reduced traction, terrain traversibility
7. Wheel Slip: Example
8. The Proposed Solution Concept by N. Chakraborty and Dr. A. Ghosal at the Indian Institute of Science (2003)
Passive Variable Camber (PVC): Lateral tilting of wheels allows the robot to move on uneven terrain without kinematic slip
9. Research Hypotheses PVC will significantly reduce kinematic slipping on uneven terrain
PVC will allow the wheel or tire to maintain better contact with the ground, improving traction and reducing dynamic slip
10. Kinematic Simulation of a WMR Uneven terrain
Robot equipped with Passive Variable Camber (PVC) joints
Traditional robot modeling is inadequate:
Need a new, precise way to simulate wheels rolling over uneven ground…
11. Analogy Between WMRs and Robot Hands
12. Simulation Concept Apply dextrous manipulator modeling techniques to a wheeled mobile robot system
Allows us to precisely simulate the motion of the wheels on an uneven terrain
13. 3-Wheeled Mobile Robot Model Front wheel is steered
Rear two wheels have Passive Variable Camber (PVC) joints
Robot moves on uneven terrain
14. System Model The following ODEs describe the system:
15. Robot Joint Velocities
16. Surface Parameterizations
17. Contact Variables Contact variables for one wheel:
Grouped for all wheels:
Velocities of the wheel relative to the ground:
18. Rolling Contact Equations and Vc are related by Montana’s1 equations of contact:
19. Closure Constraints Robot / ground system is a hybrid series / parallel mechanism.
There are three serial kinematic chains in parallel
Closure constraints: each chain of coordinate transformations must end in the same frame ({P} in this case)
20. Closure Constraints The closure constraints can be written in the form:
21. Velocity Relationships Following Han2:
22. Velocity Relationships Let c be the number of columns of JPc.
The QR decomposition of JPc is:
23. Velocity Relationships This is the constraint equation for the input velocities .
To make use of this equation, take the QR decomposition again as follows:
24. Velocity Relationships After some manipulation, we can write:
25. System Model The following ODEs describe the system:
26. Kinematic Simulation Results
27. Kinematic Simulation Results
28. Simulation Results (Hill Climbing)
29. Simulation Results (Hill Climbing)
30. Simulation Results (Random Terrain)
31. Simulation Results (Random Terrain)
32. Simulation Results (Random Terrain)
33. Next Steps Design and construct experimental test-bed
Show that a wheel with Passive Variable Camber can roll over an uneven terrain without kinematic slip
Investigate effects of PVC on power consumption and dynamic slip
34. Supplementary Slides
35. Template Template
36. Effects of Wheel Slip: Example Huntsberger, et al (2002): long-range rover autonomy
Application to NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity Mars rovers
Fuse odometry, gyros, and sun sensor with EKF to perform long-range (100’s of meters) navigation
Found ~15% error in odometry over test run
Reported wheel slip resulting in increased power consumption
37. Research Hypotheses PVC will improve robot self-localization
Nearly all path-planning, map building, and navigation algorithms need good localization
Localization especially tricky for outdoor robots on uneven terrain
Wheel slippage very difficult to model and detect
GPS alone not adequate – multi-sensor fusion is necessary, usually including wheel odometry
38. Research Hypotheses PVC will also reduce power consumption
Power is costly: battery-operated, planetary exploration, long-term autonomous navigation
39. Validation of PVC Hypotheses Kinematic simulation of a wheeled mobile robot (WMR) will determine whether PVC can eliminate kinematic slip
Experimental test bed to show that a wheel with a PVC joint can roll on an uneven terrain without slip
40. Summary: The Proposed Solution Passive Variable Camber (PVC) is introduced to reduce slip for wheeled mobile robots
41. Summary: PVC Passive Variable Camber has the potential to provide strong benefits to outdoor mobile robots:
Power efficiency
Increased localization ability
More effective path planning and obstacle avoidance
Better traction on extreme terrains
42. 3-Wheeled Mobile Robot Model
43. Template Template