1 / 17

Percent of Students in Districts with Census Poverty Rate over 20%

Percent of Students in Districts with Census Poverty Rate over 20%. Fair School Funding: Core Principles . States should provide varying levels of funding to ensure equal educational opportunities to children with different needs.

annice
Download Presentation

Percent of Students in Districts with Census Poverty Rate over 20%

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Percent of Students in Districts with Census Poverty Rate over 20%

  2. Fair School Funding: Core Principles • States should provide varying levels of funding to ensure equal educational opportunities to children with different needs. • A “progressive” finance system allocates more funding to districts with high levels of student poverty; a “regressive” system allocates less to those districts; and a “flat” system allocates roughly the same across districts with varying needs.

  3. State C (Avg. implicit base rev., progressive) State B (Avg. implicit base rev., highly regressive) State & Local Revenue per Pupil State A (Low revenue, poverty “flat”) Low Poverty High Poverty

  4. Southwest

  5. Mid-Atlantic

  6. Gulf Coast

  7. Pacific

  8. North Central

  9. Funding Level

  10. State Funding Distribution

  11. Funding Effort

  12. Does Fair Funding Mean Better Student Outcomes?

  13. New Jersey Math Achievement Trends 4th Grade NAEP 260 White, 255 250 White, 248 240 National Ave., 239 White, 239 White, 236 Hispanic, 234 Black, 232 230 National Ave., 226 Hispanic, 224 NAEP Scale Score National Ave., 222 220 Black, 217 National Ave., 219 210 Hispanic, 206 Black, 204 Hispanic, 204 200 Black, 198 190 1992  1996  2003   2007   Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress, NAEP Data Trends What Happens When States Make Smart and Equitable Investments? CA, 230

  14. New Jersey Math Achievement Trends 4th Grade NAEP 260 White, 255 250 White, 248 240 National Ave., 239 White, 239 White, 236 Hispanic, 234 Black, 232 230 National Ave., 226 Hispanic, 224 NAEP Scale Score National Ave., 222 220 Black, 217 National Ave., 219 210 Hispanic, 206 Black, 204 Hispanic, 204 200 Black, 198 190 1992  1996  2003   2007   Source: National Assessment of Educational Progress, NAEP Data Trends What Happens When States Make Smart and Equitable Investments? CA, 230

  15. State Pre-K Enrollment Source: The State of Preschool 2011, The National Institute for Early Education Research

  16. Poverty: What Can We Do? • Fair School Funding: Essential precondition to improving high need schools and boosting achievement • Key to teacher quality/equity; supplemental programs for at-risk, ELL students • State school finance reform: “Deep Resistance” • Federal Policies: subsidize state finance inequity; use federal funds to leverage states to improve funding fairness

  17. Poverty: What Can We Do? • Access to high quality Pre-K for every low income child, and every child in a low income community • State Pre-K Systems: unify Head Start, Child Care and Public School Pre-K • Right to attend school in safe and educationally adequate facilities • State capital program – assess need, ensure financing

More Related