1 / 6

Promoting Principle 10 Implementation: TAI and PP10 Initiatives Overview

The Access Initiative (TAI) and the Partnership for Principle 10 (PP10) promote accelerated and enhanced implementation of Principle 10 at the national level through common objectives and commitments for action. TAI and PP10 share common features such as global scope, non-binding nature, and peer accountability. However, they differ in their approaches, with TAI focusing on NGO coalitions and national constituencies, while PP10 emphasizes national-level indicators and global sources. Lessons learned highlight common standards and critical factors like national demand and flexibility.

anniehammond
Download Presentation

Promoting Principle 10 Implementation: TAI and PP10 Initiatives Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Elena Petkova, WRI, May 27, 2005

  2. The Access Initiative (TAI) and thePartnership for Principle 10 (PP10)focus on… promoting the accelerated and enhanced implementation of Principle 10 at the national level.

  3. TAI and PP10 Common Features • Common objectives • Global scope • Non-binding, voluntary • Decoding “access” into common elements of law and practice and into practical actions

  4. Governments, NGOs, international institutions Commitments for action: additional, measurable Peer accountability Assistance and collaboration for implementation TAI/PP10: DIFFERENCES TAI PP10 • NGO coalition • National constituencies • National-level indicators of access • Global sources and methods • National and global dialogues

  5. Lessons • Common standards • Differences: starting points, priorities, capacity • Critical factors: national demand, flexibility • Important factors: Peer accountability, financial support

  6. Sources Websites: • www.accessinitiative.org, • www.iniciativadeacceso.org • www.pp10.org Publications: Global:Closing the Gap, World Resources Report, Guide, Indicator software National reports (UNECE): Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Ukraine; Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal

More Related