1 / 16

Challenges and Successes of ATI : The Case of Mexico

Explore the successful implementation of Access to Information (ATI) in Mexico, including the key role of the Federal Commission and its impact on transparency, efficiency, and citizen empowerment. Delve into the statistics, historical context, and emerging challenges facing the ATI framework in Mexico.

anobles
Download Presentation

Challenges and Successes of ATI : The Case of Mexico

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Challenges and Successes of ATI : The Case of Mexico Juan Pablo Guerrero A. Information Commissioner February 2008

  2. Is the Mexican Federal Experience on ATI successful? • Fundamental right established in the Constitution • ATI applies to all branches of Federal Government (no exclusions) • Exemptions are clearly established and frequently require harm test

  3. Is the Mexican Federal Experience on ATI successful? • Time framework for response and complaints is clearly established • Complaints to independent Commission with binding decision powers • Complaints can challenge administrative silence and other ways of not providing information

  4. Role of the Commission: Administrative Court of Appeals • Commission can verify at any time classified information • Commission is obliged to help the applicant (remedy deficient complaints) • Commission manages the System: Info. Tech. has been widely utilized to support ATI

  5. Main results: Trust & Efficiency • Anyone, anytime, anywhere, can request information through the Internet • Anonymity: officials focus on whether the information is public or not; concerns on who is requesting and why are eliminated • Requesters have confidence and get results in less than 4 months

  6. Main result: Trust & Efficiency • Decentralization of demand (considering unreliable postal service & highly centralized Federal Government) • Accessibility is enhanced by socializing information already released through the Internet • The Commission can better supervise and enforce ATI

  7. Statistics (June 2003-February 2008) • 278,000 requests • 13,660 complaints to Federal Commission (IFAI) • 200 appeals to Judicial Courts (amparos) filed against IFAI by requesters • 70% have ruled favorably to the IFAI • 30% in favor of the complainer

  8. Requests Statistics (June 03- Feb 08)

  9. What shifted the balance toward openness? (2001-2002) • 2000: New government committed to fight corruption & promote ATI (after 70 years of One Party rule) • Civil society involvement, media & opinion leaders campaign • Small group in government in strategic areas with Presidential support • Unawareness of apparatus leaders

  10. Results: ATI making a difference • Military procurement • Emails from Interior Department and Presidential House • Disclosure of public trust funds (previously classified from banking secret) • Disclosure of files related to investigations into crimes of the “dirty war” (70’s)

  11. Results: ATI making a difference • List of guests & expenses of Presidential Birthday party • Prisoners access to personal conduct records (after years of authorities silence, nearly half of them obtained freedom) • Personal access to medical files • Students control of abusive teachers after requesting info of the program “School Security” (to prevent drugs & firearms)

  12. Challenges - Weakness • Profile of requester: young metropolitan male with high income = far away from common citizen • Only 92,000 users in total; but 5,000 account for 50% of total requests • Quality and relevance of information provided is not verified (complying & lying) • Evidence on decrease on record keeping

  13. Challenges - Weakness • Record keeping failure: frequent “inexistence” of documents in a chaotic archive environment • Inequality of the law: opacity in the income side of the budget (subsidies public; tax privileges not) • Other State or public actors are left behind: Legislative, Judicial, Political Parties, Labor Unions • Risk of capture of the Info Commission: how to make the Commission accountable to requesters? • Institutional weakness for accountability: are corruption and impunity transparent now?

  14. Is there risk for regressions? • Is Legislative Reform to ATI opening the Pandora Box? • The Commission divided on the reform of FOIA

  15. Juan Pablo Guerrero Commissioner Federal Institute for Access to Public Information Mexico February 2008 juanpablo.guerrero@ifai.org.mx www.ifai.org.mx

More Related