410 likes | 615 Views
Accelerating Expansion from Inhomogeneities ?. Je-An Gu (National Taiwan University). Collaborators: Chia-Hsun Chuang. (astro-ph/0512651). IRGAC2006, 2006/07/14. Accelerating Expansion. Based on FRW Cosmology. (homogeneous & isotropic). Supernova data ? Cosmic Acceleration.
E N D
Accelerating Expansion from Inhomogeneities ? Je-An Gu (National Taiwan University) Collaborators: Chia-Hsun Chuang (astro-ph/0512651) IRGAC2006, 2006/07/14
Accelerating Expansion Based on FRW Cosmology (homogeneous & isotropic)
Supernova data ? Cosmic Acceleration Based on FRW Cosmology (homogeneous & isotropic) However, apparently, our universe is NOT homogeneous & isotropic. At large scales, after averaging, the universe IS homogeneous & isotropic. But, averaging!? Is it legal ? Does it make sense ? • Existence of cosmic acceleration • Dark energy as a necessity of understanding acceleration
Einstein equations For which satisfy Einstein equations, in general DONOT.
Dark Geometry Effects of Inhomogeneities through averaging Einstein equations Toy Model: ds2= dt2 a2(1 + h coskx cosky coskz) (dx2+ dy2+ dz2) Einstein equations after averaging in space: (perturb: h << 1) eff peff = eff / 3 peff
Questions Supernova data ? Cosmic Acceleration Cosmic Acceleration requires Dark Energy? (or Inhomogeneity-induced Acceleration ?)
Cosmic Acceleration requires Dark Energy? Common Intuition / Consensus Normal matter attractive gravity slow down the expansion Need something abnormal : e.g. cosmological constant, dark energy -- providing anti-gravity (repulsive gravity) Is This True?
Is This True ? Intuitively, YES!(of course !!) Mission Impossible ? orMission Difficult ? This is what we did. Normal matter attractive gravity slow down the expansion Common Intuition / Consensus ** Kolb, Matarrese, and Riotto (astro-ph/0506534) : Inhomogeneities of the universe might induce acceleration. • Two directions: • Prove NO-GO theorem. • Find counter-examples. We found counter-examples for a dust universe of spherical symmetry, described by the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) solution.
Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) Solution (exact solution in GR) (unit: c = 8G = 1) Dust Fluid + Spherical Symmetry k(r) = const., 0(r) = const., a(t,r) = a(t) FRW cosmology Solution (parametric form with the help of ) arbitrary functions of r : k(r) , 0(r) , tb(r)
Line (Radial) Acceleration ( qL < 0 ) Radial: Inhomogeneity Acceleration Angular : No Inhomogeneity No Acceleration
What is Accelerating Expansion ? (I) homogeneous & isotropic universe: RW metric: Line Acceleration L We found examples of qL < 0 (acceleration) in a dust universe described by the LTB solution.
Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 k(r) 1 rk 0 r kh arbitrary functions of r : k(r) , 0(r) , tb(r) Inhomogeneity the less smoother, the better parameters : (nk, kh, rk) , 0 , rL , t
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 1 k(r) r rk 0 kh arbitrary functions of r : k(r) , 0(r) , tb(r) parameters : (nk, kh, rk) , 0 , rL , t Acceleration Observations q ~ 1 (based on FRW cosmology)
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 k(r) = 0 at rk = 0.7 Over-density Under-density
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 k(r) = 0 at rk = 0.7 characterizing the accel/deceleration status of the radial line elements
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 k(r) = 0 at rk = 0.7 Acceleration Deceleration Deceleration
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 Inhomogeneity Acceleration
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 1 k(r) r rK 0 nk=5 kh Easy to generate larger nk larger inhomogeneity Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
r = rD spherical domain r = 0 Domain Acceleration ( qD < 0 )
What is Accelerating Expansion ? (II) We found examples of qD < 0 (acceleration) in a dust universe described by the LTB solution. [Nambu and Tanimoto (gr-qc/0507057) : incorrect example.] Domain Acceleration a large domain D (e.g. size ~ H01) Volume VD NO-GOqD 0 > 0 (deceleration) in a dust universe (see, e.g., Giovannini, hep-th/0505222)
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 k(r) tb(r) arbitrary functions of r : k(r) , 0(r) , tb(r) parameters : (nk, kh, rk), (nt, tbh, rt), 0 , rD , t Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 k(r) = 0 at r = 0.82 Over-density Under-density
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 characterizing the accel/deceleration status of the radial line elements Acceleration Deceleration Deceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 larger nt larger inhomogeneity tb(r) Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
Examples of Domain Acceleration : qD < 0 Deceleration Acceleration
Model: Inhomogeneous Universe (Reality?) ? ? • These examples raise two issues : Can inhomogeneities explain cosmic acceleration ? (cosmology issue) How to understand these counter-intuitive examples ? (GR issue) Toy Model: ds2= dt2 a2(1 + h coskx cosky coskz)(dx2+ dy2+ dz2) peff = eff / 3 Against the common intuition and consensus : normal matter attractive gravity deceleration, Counter-examples (acceleration) are found. • These examples support : Inhomogeneity Acceleration
Can Inhomog. explain “Cosmic Acceleration”? IF YES Does Cosmic Acceleration exist? ? SN Ia Data Cosmic Acceleration Mathematically, possible. In Reality?? ? ? Inhomogeneities Can Inhomogeneities explain SN Ia Data?
How to understand the examples ? Intuition from Newtonian gravity, not from GR. (valid only for … ?) (x) Newton?NO. GR?YES. Common Intuition / Consensus Normal matter attractive gravity slow down the expansion Intuition for GR ?NO !?
Summary and Discussions GR is still not fully understood after 90 years !!
Line (Radial) Acceleration : qL < 0 1 k(r) r rK 0 Sharp enough change in kh(r) kh ( For constant 0 ) Sufficient and Necessary Condition: Tuning/choosing the boundary condition