490 likes | 703 Views
Institute for Systems Biology. Hplc : Performance of self made columns vs. chip system Jeff mangalin Nano 250 Spring 2013. Overview. ISB Refresher Goals for the Quarter Instruments/Techniques Interpreting Data Conclusion. Institute for Systems Biology. Four Areas of Focus
E N D
Institute for Systems Biology Hplc: Performance of self made columns vs. chip system Jeff mangalin Nano 250 Spring 2013
Overview ISB Refresher Goals for the Quarter Instruments/Techniques Interpreting Data Conclusion
Institute for Systems Biology • Four Areas of Focus • P4 Medicine • predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine. • Global Health • Sustainable Environment • Education & Outreach • Moritz Lab • Proteomics Core Facility • Protein Identification
Goals for the Quarter • Get familiar with the equipment and computer programs. • Quameter • Peakview • LC-MS Unit • Determine Performance of Self Made Columns • Determine the performance of the Chip Based LC System • Self Made Columns vs Chip
What is a Peptide? [1] • Short chains of amino acid monomers • Contain 50 Amino Acids or Less • Shortest peptide is a chain of 2. • Enzyme breaks protein down to peptides. • Chains of about 10 amino acids
High Performance Liquid Chromatography • Used to separate a mixture of compounds, for identification purposes. • Column packed with hydrophobic beads • In our case C18 resin of 3 µm diameter • Separates compounds based on hydrophobicity • More hydrophobic molecules move slower because they are attracted to the beads. • Gradually increase hydrophobicity of buffer to sequentially elute peptides based on their hydrophobicity
HPLC [2]
EksigentnanoLC 400 Systems/cHiPLC System [3] Docking station, pumps, valves 3 microfluidic chips Can also process self made columns
How it works (Chip System) • 1. Jumper Chip • plumbing • 2. Trap • Collects peptides • 3. Column • Gradient sequentiallyEludes peptides fromtrap to column • Out to MS
How it works (Chip System) • 1. Jumper Chip • plumbing • 2. Trap • Collects peptides • 3. Column • Gradient sequentiallyEludes peptides fromtrap to column • Out to MS
AB SCIEX TripleTOF® 5600 • Used for determining elemental composition of a sample • Three Components • Ion Source • Mass Analyzer • Detector
Self Made Columns • How to make a column. • Cut tubing to desired length • Make frit • polymer • Bomb • 3 µm beads packed into tubing via pressure. • Takes about 30 minutes to pack
Chip Easy to connect Dead volume free connections Claims to have reproducible results
The Experiment How will we compare the chip vs self made columns?
Experimental Variables • Different Samples • Complex • E. Coli • Simple • BetaGal • Different size ID tubing • 50 µm ID • 75 µm ID • 100 µm ID • 4 Runs each • Not all runs turned out. • Compare the results
BetaGal [5] Beta-galactosidase AbSciex uses this as their standard sample Relatively simple sample Easy to look at in analysis
E. Coli [6] • Complex Sample • Thousands of Peptides • Bacteria • Found in lower intestines • Very important for molecular/synthetic biology • Easy to grow • Well studied
Software How do we interpret the data?
Peakview Used for qualitative review of LC/MS and MS/MS systems Enables data investigation by showing mass differences between peaks Generate background subtracted spectra, merging related spectra, or creating contour plots Can show multiple runs at once
…and this is what it looks like! But what does it all mean?
Parameters to look at… Retention Time Peak Width Width at 50% Max Height Tailing
Do other peptides behave similarly? Self Made Chip
E. Coli Self Made and Chip Runs Self Made Chip System
Quameter • Created to generate National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard metrics for LC-MS/MS experiments • Metrics • Generated from Data representing arbitrary complex samples. • IDFree • Does not give values for individual peaks/peptides • Creates metrics based on distribution of entire XIC.
Key Quameter Parameters • XIC-FWHM Q1-3 • Q1- The width where 25% of peak widths are narrower • Q2 – The median peak width • Q3 – The width where 75% of widths are narrower • RT-TIC Q1-4 • Q1 – The time it takes to reach 25% of the TIC • Q2 – Time to 50%...and so on
Results • Similar results from Self-made columns and Chip System • Chip system • Narrower width at 50% half max • More Tailing • Does the tailing matter? • About 30 cm extra tubing on chip connection • Chip runs are more consistent • Not as much shift in retention time
Conclusion • Is Chip system better than self made columns? • Need more info • More runs • How long will chips last vs columns? • Cost efficient? • Consistently produces similar results to self made column. • Slightly narrower FWHM • Easy set up • Conclusion: Viable alternative to self made columns
Summary ISB Refresher Goals for the Quarter Instruments/Techniques Interpreting Data Results Conclusion
References 1.“Biology-Forums.com." Peptide Bonding. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 May 2013. 2. "Protein Facility." The of the Iowa State University Office of Biotechnology:. 09 May 2013 <http://www.protein.iastate.edu/> 3. http://www.eksigent.com/images/Fixed%20size/Prod-180x224-40x40/eksigent-cHiPLC-System.jpg 4. "Mass Spectrometry." Mass Spectrometry. 09 May 2013 http://www.lamondlab.com/MSResource/LCMS/MassSpectrometry/massSpectrometry.php. 5. Beta-galactosidase." Wikipedia. 05 Sept. 2013. Wikimedia Foundation. 09 May 2013 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-galactosidase. 6. "E. coli." Wikipedia. 05 Sept. 2013. Wikimedia Foundation. 09 May 2013 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._coli.