1 / 16

WINNING IN THE LONG RUN ?

WINNING IN THE LONG RUN ?. A Quantified Approach to the Uncertainty of Sustainable Financial Value on Real Estate (Working Paper 2) GRANTS Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Education Trust Austrian Chamber of Commerce, Federation of Real Estate Professionals

antonie
Download Presentation

WINNING IN THE LONG RUN ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WINNING IN THE LONG RUN ? A Quantified Approach to the Uncertainty of Sustainable Financial Value on Real Estate (Working Paper 2) GRANTSRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Education TrustAustrian Chamber of Commerce, Federation of Real Estate Professionals AUTHORSVis. Prof. Dr. Juerg R. Bernet, MSC MBA MRICSProf. Sarah Sayce, BSc PhD FRICS IRRVMaarten Vermeulen, MBA MSRE FRICSDI Rupert C. LedlBilly Clements, BSc KEYWORDSCommercial Real Estate; Sustainability Metrics; Risk; Worth; Methodology Milan, 25-06-2010

  2. AGENDA RATIONALE: background – issues – aims CHALLENGE of a low growth economy BENEFITS of a sustainable performance plan CONCEPT of the driving systainability indicators FRAMEWORK of systainability metrics DATA SET for sustainability reporting MODEL for measuring the Impact of sustainability UNIVERSE of a first study in Europe WAY FORWARD searching market evidence

  3. Project Rationale: BACKGROUND THEORY Environmental and social footprint – ongoing risk to property portfoliosLink through to value line via various conduits

  4. Project Rationale: BACKGROUND REALITY Paucity of evidence to support value differential (Sayce et al, 2010)Limited evidence emerging in US – CERTIFICATION LEVEL No such evidence for European markets and portfolios KEY QUESTIONS What sustainability factors impact on property returns?What risks do they present?Are these risks priced appropriately?

  5. Project Rationale: KEY ISSUES DEFINING SUSTAINABILITY No globally accepted definition or criteria setExisting empirical studies tie to CERTIFICATION as a surrogate (e.g. LEED) BUT Not necessarily an indication of ‘full’ or ongoing sustainabilityAccreditation uptake in Europe is limitedGrading and specific CRITERIA not extrapolated (w/exception of Energy Star) Identify aspects of commonality amongst existing rating systems/tools

  6. Project Rationale: KEY ISSUES MEASURING SUSTAINABILITY Data measurement and collection core to building sustainability CRITERIA into financial modelling and worth forecasts BUT Measurement practices globally remain limitedKey metrics (e.g. Energy) only collected by 19% of investors (Kok et al. 2010) Identify those metrics which are most commonly collected and held by portfolio managers

  7. Project Rationale: AIMS OVERARCHING AIM Develop a deeper understanding of how individual sustainability risks are translating into market responses to inform investment decision making OBJECTIVES [1] To decompose existing rating systems to establish in particular which characteristics are most widely included [2] To establish which sustainability characteristics are most likely to have an impact on risk/return performance moving forward [3] To set up a mathematical model capable of analysing risk and returns on assets against a selected range of sustainability and conventional performance characteristics [4] To trial the model on actual assets to test whether data can in practice be collated

  8. The Challenge of a Low Growth Economy IN OUT Income Growth Non-RecoverableCost REDUCE ! Capital Expenditure Property Tax RATE OF RETURN (Inflation) ? PRESERVE ! Performance Attribution Income Yield

  9. The Benefits of a Sustainable Performance Plan Standing Investment      SHORT POSITION Performance Drivers Income Yield Income Growth Non-Recoverable Cost Capital Expenditure Property Tax - PERFORMANCE PLAN Sustainable Investment      LONG POSITION Observations Expectations

  10. The Concept of Driving Sustainability Indicators natural social economic PROPERTY • MANAGEMENT • ENVIRONMENT

  11. Towards a Framework of SustainabilityMetrics REGULATORSEC (EPBD; GBP), ISO, CEN (EN15643-4) INVESTORSISA (BREEAM), GRA (GR), GBA (GBA-CM) COUNCILSUNEP-FI/SBCI (FSMR), GRI (CRESS), WGBC, SBA (CMF) SIRE AUDITORSKPMG, PWC, VERITAS,FERI ASSOCIATIONSRICS, ICSC (BREEAM), INREV, EPRA ASSESSORSBRE (BREEAM), GBCI (LEED), DGNB (DGNB), BMVBS (BNB), AHQE (HQE) CONSULTANTSJLL (OSCAR), IPD (ISPI), CBRE UNIVERSITIESKU (SAP), TUK, UM, HBS, CCRS (ESI), DUK

  12. The Data Set for Sustainability Reporting PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT Natural Physical Natural Social Economic Strategic Financial Asset ISSUE ACCOUNT UNIT AMOUNT Energy Electricity kWh Fuels kWh Water used m3 Water Water recycled / harvested m3 Waste Waste disposed to landfill t Source: GBA (Ellison & Brown 2010) Waste disposed to other t Carbon Green house gas emissions t CO2e Emissions saved t CO2e

  13. A Model for Measuring the Impact of Sustainability SUSTAINABILITYINDICATORS Explaning Variables PROPERTY ENVIRONMENT economic social natural MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE DRIVERS Explained Variables (Income Yield) INCOME GROWTH NON-RECOVERABLE COST CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (Property Tax) ANALYTICALMODEL Mathematical Functions DCFDisconted Cash-Flow MFRMulti-Factor Regression ROAReal Option Analysis

  14. The Universe of a First Studyin Europe INVESTMENT FUNDS POLICY, LEADERSHIP Investors North Europe GB S FS NL F DE CH A CZ Regions Office & Retail Single-Let, Multi-Let Sectors RESEARCH PORTFOLIO Cycle Standing, Retro-Fit In-USE Scope MANAGERS, (USERS) Ownership Pool-Size F/COUNTRY ≥ 2, F/POOL ≤ 25% 200-300 ASSETS

  15. The Way Forward Searching for Market Evidence 5) SPECIFY APPROACHdescribemethodologyforanalysis of othermarkets 4) TEST LIMITATIONSverifygereralisation and restrictions andforfurtherresearch 3) FIND EVIDENCEevaluateobservations of sustainablilityworth 2) DESIGN MODELevaluatetheavailabledatawithalternative modelsettings 1) COLLECT DATAstructurethedatabaseandset up thedatatemplate

  16. ACKNOWLEDMENTS . Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors RICS Education Trust Austrian Chamber of Commerce, Federation of Real Estate Professionals Milan, 21-06-2010 Acknowledgements

More Related