120 likes | 271 Views
This framework combines traditional and contemporary leadership theories to enhance educational leadership practices in schools. It covers various approaches such as trait, behavioral, contingency, transformational, and strategic leadership theories. The framework also emphasizes the role of teachers as leaders and the importance of shared leadership to improve school performance and foster a culture of success.
E N D
An Educational Leadership Framework Based on Traditional and Contemporary Leadership Theories TNG Cheong Sing MonashUniversity
Traditional leadership theories • Trait approach • Personalities, motives, values & skills of natural leaders, but none of these traits was superior (Stogdill 1948) • Behavioural approach • Task-relationship dichotomy for leadership behaviour such as consideration & initiating structure (Stogdill & Coons 1957), concern for people & production (Blake & Mouton 1964), employee & job centric behaviours (Bowers & Seashore 1966) • Contingency approach • Contextual factors influencing leadership processes, such as characteristics of environment, subordinates & tasks (House 1971), task structure, leader-member relations & leader’s position power to evaluate subordinates’ performance (Fiedler 1964), amt of relevant information possessed, importance of decision, subordinates’ acceptability of decision (Vroom & Yetton 1973), subordinate maturity (Hersey & Blanchard 1977)
Contemporary educational leadership theories • Transformational leadership • Shared decision-making, teacher empowerment, understanding & encouraging change, team work, see complete picture, continuous school improvement, foster school community’s sense of ownership (Leithwood 1992) • Strategic leadership • Relationships between external environment & organization’s mission as well as implementation (Maghroori & Rolland 1997)
Other contemporary educational leadership theories • Educative leadership • Cultural proficiency (Lindsey, Robins & Terrell 2003) • Organizational leadership • Enhancement of capability to accomplish effective work collectively (Heifetz 1994) • Leadership from school principals, teachers, administrators & parents have +ve effects on school performance (Pounder, Ogawa & Adams 1995, p. 567)
Generic organizational leadership functions • Align tasks with objectives & strategies • Build commitment, optimism, trust & cooperation • Develop & empower subordinates • Encourage & facilitate collective learning • Interpret complex events • Organize & coordinate activities • Promote social justice & morality • Secure resources & support • Strengthen collective identity (Yukl 2006)
Teachers as Leaders framework • Prepare students for better future • Achieve authenticity in teaching, learning and assessment practices • Facilitate communities of learning • Confront barriers in cultures & structures of schools • Translate ideas into sustainable actions • Nurture success culture (Crowther et al. 2002)
Themes for literature on teacher leadership • Individual teacher leader roles • Teacher leader’s on-the-job learning • Conceptualization of teacher leadership being central to building professional communities & renewing school cultures (Lieberman & Miller 2004)
Derivation of personal leadership framework • Shared leadership counters possibly Western cultural bias attributing organizational performance to individual heroic leadership (Yukl 2006) • Diversity leading standardization parallels replacement of universal personal leadership theories with contingency organizational leadership theories , superiority of shared over heroic leadership
Derivation of personal leadership framework (cont) • Flawed processes more responsible than individual failures for not satisfying expectation when nurturing success culture in schools (Crowther et al. 2002) • Without unrealistic expectation for individual to take responsibility for organizational failure, shared leadership with subordinate empowerment is more effective than heroic leadership (Bradford & Cohen 1984) • Conduct leadership research in specific organizational context (Dachler 1984; Drath 2001; Gronn 2002)
Personal leadership framework for university academics Source: derived from Crowther et al. (2002, pp. 4-5)