470 likes | 619 Views
Large-scale orography and monsoon Akio KITOH Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency. 1: Introduction 2: Surface temperature change 3: Asian monsoon 4: El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Effects of mountains on climate. Kutzbach et al. (1993) J.Geology.
E N D
Large-scale orography and monsoon Akio KITOH Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency 1: Introduction 2: Surface temperature change 3: Asian monsoon 4: El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO)
Effects of mountains on climate Kutzbach et al. (1993) J.Geology
Arid and Semiarid Climate mountain no mountain observed Broccoli and Manabe (1992)
soil moisture precipitation M Eurasia is drier in M than in NM NM Broccoli and Manabe (1992)
transient eddy moisture flux M Larger eddy activity and larger moisture flux over Northern Eurasia in NM NM Broccoli and Manabe (1992)
4 types of large-scale forcing or b.c. for the South Asian monsoon the monsoon is most sensitive to the elevation and radiation (orbital) changes CCM1+50m mixed-layer Kutzbach et al. (1993) J.Geology
GCM Study on mountain and monsoon #AGCM perpetual July Hahn and Manabe 1975: Jul GFDL 270km L11 Kutzbach et al. 1989: Jan/Jul CCM R15 L9 #AGCM seasonal cycle Broccoli and Manabe 1992: GFDL R30 L9 NH midlatitude dry climates An et al. 2001: NCAR CCM3 4 stage Himalayan uplift Liu and Yin 2002: COLA AGCM 11cases: 0%, 10%, …, 100% #AGCM + slab ocean Kutzbach et al. 1993: CCM1 R15 L12 + 50m slab ocean Kitoh 1997: MRI-II 4x5 L15 + 50m slab ocean #AOGCM Kitoh 2002, Abe et al. 2003: MRI-CGCM1 (4x5) Effect of SST change Kitoh 2004: MRI-CGCM2 (T42) 0% to 140%
Effect of Large-Scale Mountains on Surface Climate ・Exp-M control ・CGCM coupled GCM ・Exp-NM no mountain ・SGCM slab-ocean ・AGCM Model topography in the control run
Stationary eddies at 500 hPa in January Variance northward of 20N are 3,800 (M), 1,600 (NM) and 2,200 m2 (M-NM). Thus, the land-sea distribution effect (NM) explains about 40%, and the mountain effect (M-NM) explains about 60% of the total variance.
200 hPa Winds January: The Asian subtropical jet M is 15 m s-1 stronger. But zonal mean zonal wind at 30N is the same. July: The subtropical jet in NM stays at 30N.
Surface Winds Note the difference in trade winds both in Jan and Jul, and different wind direction over the Arabian Sea in July.
Precipitation An overall precipitation pattern is similar. > land-sea configuration and SST distribution are the main factors. NM summertime Asian precipitation elongates along 10N belt. M has less precipitation over Eurasia. Shape of ITCZ.
Sea-level pressure January: Shape of the Siberan high. July: strong Pacific subtropical anticyclone in M
Annual mean surface air temperature difference non-adjusted adjusted for 6.5 K/km Large negative temperature change over mountains. < elevation effect SST also changes. + inland area - coastal area / ocean
South Asia and Eastern Asia: precipitation-soil moisture-evaporation, precipitation-cloudiness-insolation Continental interior: precipitable water and moisture flux convergence are less, dry ground, less cloud
Summary (Land surface temperature) Orography induces a warmer continental interior and colder coastal area over land. The land surface temperature drops due to the lapse-rate effect. When this effect is eliminated, the continent interior becomes warmer with a mountain uplift, because clouds become fewer and the surface drier due to a decreased moisture transport. On the other hand, South Asia becomes cooler because the summer monsoon is stronger, and heavier precipitation makes the land surface wetter and increases the clouds.
Summary (SST) The SST decreases due to orography particularly over the subtropical eastern oceans. This occurs because less solar radiation reaches the surface due to more low-level clouds that are induced by a strong subtropical anticyclone.
Experiments M14 (140%) M12 (120%) M10 (control) M8 (80%) M6 (60%) M4 (40%) M2 (20%) M0 (no mountain) 0 10 20 30 40 50 year All mountains are varied uniformly between 0% and 140%. Land-sea distribution is the same for all experiments. MRI-CGCM2. No flux adjustment.
MRI CGCM2 • AGCM • MRI/JMA98 • T42 (2.8x2.8), L30 (top at 0.4 hPa) • Longwave radiation - Shibata and Aoki (1989) • Shortwave radiation - Shibata and Uchiyama (1992) • Cumulus - Prognostic Arakawa-Schubert type • PBL - Mellor and Yamada level 2 (1974) • Land Surface - L3SiB or MRI/JMA_SiB • OGCM • Resolution : 2.5x(0.5-2.0), 23layers • Eddy mixing : Isopycnal mixing, GM • Seaice : Mellor and Kantha (1989) • Coupling • Time interval : 24hours • Flux adjustment: “without” in this experiment
120E-140E pentad precipitation M0 0.71 M2 0.74 M4 0.75 M6 0.79 M8 0.81 M10 0.79 M12 0.74 M14 0.66 50N obs 10S Numbers indicate spatial cc with obs
0% 60 120 20 80 140 40 100% OBS
Note the difference in the Pacific warm pool. Over the Indian Ocean, SST gradient reverses.
What is the merit of using CGCM? AGCM: only dynamical/thermodynamical effect of mountain CGCM: air-sea interaction, effect of SST change Additional AGCM experiments were performed with the same experimental design A0, A2, A4, A6, A8, A10, A12, A14 Comparison between CGCM and AGCM experiments
Precipitation Precipitable water CGCM AGCM C-A
Rainfall Index IMR: India, land 10N-30N, 60E-100E SEAM: Southeast Asia 5N-25N, 100E-130E EAM: East Asia 25N-35N, 120E-140E CGCM AGCM AGCM CGCM CGCM AGCM
Koppen climate: India 0% 100% •“BW” “BS”“Aw” as precip increases •“BS” in the interior part of southern peninsular India does not appear in the model due to coarse resolution OBS
Koppen climate: China 0% 100% •“BW”“BS”dominates in 0%〜40% cases; too dry •“Cw”“Cf” appears from 60% case as precip increases •“Cs” appears in 80%〜120% cases due to larger winter precip OBS
Summary (Monsoon) • Systematic changes in precipitation pattern and circulation fields as well as SST appeared with progressive mountain uplift. • In the summertime, precipitation area moved inland of Asian continent with mountain uplift, while the Pacific subtropical anticyclone and associated trade winds became stronger. • The model has reproduced a reasonable Baiu rain band at the 60% case and higher. • CGCM results were different from AGCM’s: CGCM showed a larger sensitivity to mountain uplift than AGCM.
NINO3.4 SST and SOI m0 m6 m12 m2 m8 m14 m4 m10 → lower mountain cases have larger amplitude
In M0, the SST pattern is nearly symmetric about the equator. The spatial pattern (e.g., meridional width) changes with uplift.
Power spectra of each leading mode of SST EOF 33.6% 29.5% 17.5% 6 4 2 yr 25.6% 18.1% 16.9% In M0, frequency peak is at 7 yr. When mountain becomes higher, it shifts toward high frequency, and explained variance smaller. 25.6% 18.5%
Pacific trade winds become stronger associated with strengthened subtropical high with mountain uplift
Change in Mean Climate: Trade Winds low mountain high mountain → Easterlies in lower mountain cases are strong in the eastern Pacific, but weak in the western Pacific
Change in Mean Climate: Upper Ocean Heat Content and its zonal gradient low mountain high mountain → lower mountain cases have larger OHC gradient
Summary (ENSO) Systematic changes in SST and ENSO as well as precipitation pattern and circulation fields appeared with progressive mountain uplift. When the mountain height is low, a warm pool is located over the central Pacific; it shifts westward with mountain uplift. Model El Nino is strong, frequency is long and most periodic in the no mountain run. They become weaker, shorter and less periodic when the mountain height increases. As mountain height increases, the trade winds intensify and the location of the maximum SST variability shifts westwards. Smaller amplitude of El Nino with high mountain cases may be related to smaller SST/OHC gradient in the central Pacific. Short return period of El Nino may be associated with a westward displacement of most variable SST longitude and a decrease in the meridional width.