110 likes | 122 Views
Math Compaction. Mitch aulakh. Background. Investigation of EAP Data and ongoing efforts to fully implement an integrated pathway Combined ready and conditional rates stayed high for our summative students
E N D
Math Compaction Mitch aulakh
Background • Investigation of EAP Data and ongoing efforts to fully implement an integrated pathway • Combined ready and conditional rates stayed high for our summative students • How do we ensure that we continue to serve the students that are reaching for the highest level of math possible?
Comparing Old Methods8th Grade Algebra 1 Grade 7 Pre-Algebra Grade 8* Algebra 1 (39.9% State) (37.1 % County) Grade 9 Geometry Grade 10 Algebra II Grade 11 Pre-Calc “The K-7 standards contain the prerequisites to prepare students for Algebra I by 8th grade…” pg. 84 *Data reflect CST taking rates for 2012-13
Comparing Old Methods7th Grade Algebra 1 Grade 7* Algebra (6.0% State) (7.6% County) Grade 8 Geometry Grade 9 Algebra II Grade 10 Pre-Calc Grade 11 Calculus AB or BC *Data reflect CST taking rates for 2012-13
Integrated Math Rollout • Implement one year of integrated pathway to start students on a cohort • Mix of integrated and traditional math pathways temporarily • At what point do we begin compaction? Do we double up on classes, create accelerated tracks, look for dual enrollment opportunities, etc…? • What does the research say as far effective practices for acceleration?
Questions? maulakh@murrieta.k12.ca.us