1 / 22

Reciprocal Altruism:

Reciprocal Altruism:. Mona Moshtaghi. Be kind or be left behind. Helping in times of danger Sharing food Helping the ill, the wounded, or the very young & old Sharing implements Sharing knowledge. Human Altruism. http://www.cdnresearch.net/pubs/others/trivers_1971_recip.pdf.

apu
Download Presentation

Reciprocal Altruism:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reciprocal Altruism: Mona Moshtaghi Be kind or be left behind

  2. Helping in times of danger Sharing food Helping the ill, the wounded, or the very young & old Sharing implements Sharing knowledge Human Altruism http://www.cdnresearch.net/pubs/others/trivers_1971_recip.pdf

  3. Frans de Waal • Primatologist • Branch of zoology & anthropology • Study of primates • Fieldwork • Chimpanzees, bonobos, capuchins • Animals predisposed: • to take care of one another • come to one another’s aid • take life-saving action. Nature of Altruism  Acts of selflessness http://www.psychology.emory.edu/nab/dewaal/

  4. How empathy comes naturally to humans & other animals… Human biology offers a giant helping hand to those striving for a just society. Every human is destined to be humane.

  5. Food-Associated Calls • Widespread in mammalian and avian species. • Researchers have based hypotheses about the function of these calls on the responses of call recipients. • Assumed that these calls have evolved to attract others to a food source because call recipients often approach a caller. Julie Jeannette Gros-Louis (2001) Food-associated calls in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebuscapucinus): Different functions from the perspective of the signaler and the recipient. 
http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3015315

  6. Research • Experiment • Naturalistic observations and food placement experiments were conducted to determine the factors that influence the production of food-associated calls. • Results • Factors that influenced call production were inconsistent with an information-sharing function. • For signalers, food-associated calls appeared to function to announce food ownership, thereby decreasing aggression from other individuals. Manson, J. H., Perry, S. and Stahl, D. (2005), Reconciliation in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebuscapucinus). American Journal of Primatology, 65: 205–219. doi: 10.1002/ajp.2011

  7. Research • Animals may share food to gain immediate or delayed fitness benefits. • Previous studies of sharing have concentrated on delayed benefits such as reciprocity, trade and punishment. • This study: • Tests an alternative model (the harassment or sharing-under-pressure hypothesis) • a food owner immediately benefits because sharing avoids costly harassment from a beggar. Stevens JR (2004) The Selfish Nature of Generosity: harassment and food sharing in primates. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:451-456

  8. Food Calling & Punishment • Rhesus macaques that do not give food calls at preferred food sources are more likely to be targets of aggression ([Hauser, 1992] and [Hauser and Marler, 1993]). In rhesus macaques, Macacamulatta, finders that do not give food-associated calls (and are caught ‘cheating’) receive higher rates of aggression and end up eating less food than animals that give food-associated calls after finding a sharable resource. Hauser (1992) and Hauser & Marler (1993) Food-associated calls may be given to reduce punishment by more dominant animals (Hauser 1992). Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  9. Sneaky Monkeys Tufted capuchin monkeys usually gave food-associated calls when they discovered platforms filled with bananas. The probability of calling before versus after arriving at the platform was strongly affected by the presence of individuals nearby. Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  10. Monkey Business http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbQf6X9UkX0

  11. Cooperation • In caring for the young, cooperation is evident in the feeding habits of the monkeys. • Vocal calls include a variety of chirps, chatters, screams, whistles, and long calls (Snowdon, 1993). • Chirps occur in a variety of contexts, primarily in response to the discovery of food or during other kinds of exploratory behavior. http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~mnkylab/theses/AmyDeIpolyi/methods.html

  12. What factors induce or inhibit such behavior?

  13. Three factors affect the probability of a finder not giving food-associated calls. Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  14. First Factor: • They had a higher probability of not calling during the season of relative fruit scarcity. • That they tend not to call when the opportunity cost of losing access to a resource is presumably higher. “However, with this data I cannot rule out the possibility that this seasonal pattern is due to another factor and not to the opportunity cost since I have only 1 year of data.” • Data from more seasons (or more than one group) are necessary to test for the effect of the opportunity cost. Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  15. Second Factor: • Individuals had a lower probability of giving food-associated calls if the platform contained a small amount of food (three pieces of banana that could be monopolized by the finder) as opposed to a large amount (20 or 40 pieces) Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  16. Third Factor • Individuals had a higher probability of not calling when many others were nearby. These last two factors may indicate that finders have a higher probability of not calling if they can monopolize the food source or if nearby animals are already aware of the presence of the food source when the finder arrives at the source. Mario S. Di Bitetti (2005) Food-associated calls and audience effects in tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebusapellanigritus. Animal Behaviour69:911-919

  17. Monkey Cooperation & Fitness http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAFQ5kUHPkY

  18.  Food! I’m hungry!  Can’t reach!  Let me pull a little harder…  What should we do?  Together we get some here…  Together we some there there. http://illusivemind.blogspot.com/2005/05/evolution-altruism-and-ethics.html

  19. http://livestrong.jona.nl/was/altruism.html

  20. A Mom is a Mom… …No Matter What the Species http://vetlocator.com/jokes/tiger_mom.php

  21. Unique Experience Link provides an example of an altruistic act by a “predator” toward a creature obviously not it’s “kin”.

  22. Thank you http://10milediet.wordpress.com/2010/09/27/yall-come-over-now/

More Related