280 likes | 438 Views
ECO120 Macroeconomics Rod Duncan. Lecture 3- Measuring GDP. Announcements. Tutorials start this week. Tutorial allocations are on the Interact website under Resources. The assignment for Tutorial 1 is to print out your registration on the Course Compass webpage.
E N D
ECO120 MacroeconomicsRod Duncan Lecture 3- Measuring GDP
Announcements • Tutorials start this week. Tutorial allocations are on the Interact website under Resources. • The assignment for Tutorial 1 is to print out your registration on the Course Compass webpage. • Tuesday tutorials changed to C3-401 (upstairs in the Library).
What are the big questions? • What drives people to study macroeconomics? They want solutions to problems such as: • Can we avoid fluctuations in the economy? • How can we make the economy grow faster? • Can we lower the unemployment rate? • Why do we have inflation? • How can we manage interest rates? • Is the foreign trade deficit a problem?
Economic output • Gross domestic product- The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a period (usually the year). • “Market value”- so we use the prices in markets to value things • “Final”- we only value goods in their final form (so we don’t count sales of milk to cheese-makers- “intermediate goods”) • “Goods and services”- both count as output
Nominal versus real GDP • We use prices to value output in calculating GDP, but prices change all the time. And over time, the average level of prices generally has risen (inflation). • Nominal GDP: value of output at current prices • Real GDP: value of output at some fixed set of prices
Measuring GDP • Are we 40 times (655/16) better off than our grandparents? • Australian GDP in 1960- $15.6 billion • Australian GDP in 2000- $655.6 billion • What are we forgetting to adjust for?
Measuring GDP • Population- Australia’s population was 10 million in 1960 and 19 million in 2000. • GDP per person in 1960 = $15.6 bn / 10m = $1,560 • GDP per person in 2000 = $655.6 bn / 19m = $34,500 • Prices- $1,000 in 1960 bought a better life-style than $1,000 in 2000.
Nominal versus real GDP • So how to correct for rising prices over time? • Measure average prices over time (GDP deflator, Consumer Price Index, Producer Price Index, etc) • Deflate nominal GDP by the average level of prices to find real GDP Real GDP = Nominal GDP / GDP Deflator
Measuring GDP • Real GDP -If we instead use 1996-1997 prices to calculate GDP then Australia GDP in 1960 was $138 billion while Australian GDP in 2000 was $631 billion. • Real GDP per person • 1960: $138bn/10m = $13,800 • 2000: $631bn/19m = $33,200 • So we are 2.5 times better off than our grandparents.
Measures of economic output • Gross domestic product- The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a period (usually the year) within a country. • Gross national product- The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a period (usually the year) by Australians. • So an Australian lawyer working overseas for 6 months would include his overseas earnings as Aussie GNP but not Aussie GDP. • Important: GDP/GNP figures use “market prices” to value things and do not count intermediate goods.
Why measure GDP? • What are the goals of economics? • Answer: Achieve the greatest happiness (welfare or utility) for individuals in society. • Problem: We can’t measure happiness. • Second best: We measure the resources and opportunities available to members of society. • We assume that happiness is related to the range of choices individuals have within society. The more choices people have, the more likely they are to find a choice they are happy with.
Why measure GDP? • We can’t measure the range of choices, so we measure the value of what we produce and assume that a greater value of production meant that we had more opportunities. • Paradox of happiness: Richer people report themselves as happier than poorer people around them. But average happiness in rich societies is not greater than average happiness in poor societies. • So how can we say we are measuring happiness when more GDP does not make people happier?
Rod’s holiday snaps • Rod was hired to write an economic survey of the Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. • AusAID, which is a department of the Australian government (paid for by the Australian taxpayers), partly paid for the surveys.
So how do people fare living on an island paradise? • Most of the population is subsistence farmers. Small garden plots can feed a whole family. There is no evidence of starvation and limited malnutrition. • Survival is very easy. Food is relatively plentiful, and housing does not need to be sophisticated. • However domestic, clan and political violence can be common- depending on the area. • Political corruption is rampant. Public services- hospitals and education- are very limited.
How to describe an island paradise? • We might talk about the number of people on the island. (Actually each country is made up of lots of little islands.) • We might talk about the size of the island (land area). • How crowded is it? We might talk about number of people per square km. • Are people crowded into the city? We might talk about what fraction of the population lives in the urban areas.
How well off are people in an island paradise? (income) • We might measure the income of the people. We are assuming that more income means a population that is better cared for. • We ask “how much do you earn?” • But are we really interested in how much a country earns? What we want is how much the average person earns- “per capita”.
But where would you rather live? • China has the largest GNI at $2.6 trillion US$. • But Australia has a larger per capita GNI at $35,860 per person. Why? • Because Australia’s total GNI is split over 20 million people versus China’s 1.3 billion people. • Is this the whole story?
Does income equal quality of life? • One problem with using income per person is that money won’t buy the same things in different places. • $500,000 will buy a spacious 5 bedroom house with a large lot in the best suburb in Bathurst. The same $500,000 will buy a small house in a poor suburb in Sydney. • The same fact holds across countries. Economists try to correct for this by calculating “purchasing power parity” (PPP) GNI.
Does GDP = happiness? • Citizens of richer countries generally: • Lead longer, healthier lives; • Are better educated and spend more years in education; • Have more leisure time and opportunities; • Have greater levels of political participation; • Lead less risky lives from natural or man-made disasters; • Breathe cleaner air and drink cleaner water; • … • So perhaps asking people about their “happiness” is not the right question.
Does GDP = happiness? • Principle of revealed preference • Definition: If I see someone choosing option A over Option B, I assume that person is at least as happy with option A as option B. • Fact: I observe millions of people risking their lives, their health and their wealth to leave low GDP countries to move to high GDP countries. I observe very, very few people moving in the opposite direction to better their lives. • So does revealed preference tell us life is better in high GDP than in low GDP countries?