1 / 5

Raks Thai Foundation is PR in round 2 for Prevention of HIV/AIDS Among Migrant Workers in Thailand

Raks Thai Foundation is PR in round 2 for Prevention of HIV/AIDS Among Migrant Workers in Thailand. Objectives:. 430,000 migrant workers, family members, sex workers and related populations. Health systems, migrant community and favorable policies. 6 NGOs partners, 1 government.

arawn
Download Presentation

Raks Thai Foundation is PR in round 2 for Prevention of HIV/AIDS Among Migrant Workers in Thailand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Raks Thai Foundation is PR in round 2 for Prevention of HIV/AIDS Among Migrant Workers in Thailand Objectives: 430,000 migrant workers, family members, sex workers and related populations Health systems, migrant community and favorable policies 6 NGOs partners, 1 government

  2. Raks Thai Foundation is PR in round 3 HIV Prevention, Care and Support for Injecting Drug Users(CASIDU)– non-CCMproject Objectives: Reduce new HIV infections among IDU through a peer-based approach. Harm reduction drop in centers. Referral for HIV and health services Educational materials. Advocacy on War on Drugs 1 IDU network, 2 NGOs

  3. Lessons Learned working with CCM • Voice of CS is weakened by government dominance. • CCM is not familiar with NGO projects and program issues e.g. migrant, IDU. • CCM follows government priorities and rather than being “Country Coordinating Mechanism” Becomes “Government Coordinating Mechanism”.

  4. Lessons Learned working with GF • GF has flexibility in program conceptualization. • Voice of CS is weakened due to GF focus government priorities. • GF cannot reduce imbalance of power between government and CS in CCM. GF has rigid process that limits ability of civil society organizations to participate.

  5. Recommendations • Allow more flexibility for non-CCM proposal submission. Separate Government and CS proposals and review process. • Recognize that CS projects are not always large scale up but can contribute significantly to innovation and long term program development. CCM should support program implementation and favorable policy change.

More Related