1 / 19

Saltmarsh Sparrows on Chafee NWR

Saltmarsh Sparrows on Chafee NWR. Occupancy Methods. Presence / absence individuals = each SALS and associated habitat Established 1 ha grids along UTM lines John H. Chafee NWR = 123 grids Sachuest Point NWR = 34 grids Three replicates per year (June / July / August)

arch
Download Presentation

Saltmarsh Sparrows on Chafee NWR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Saltmarsh Sparrows on Chafee NWR

  2. Occupancy Methods • Presence / absence individuals = each SALS and associated habitat • Established 1 ha grids along UTM lines • John H. Chafee NWR = 123 grids • Sachuest Point NWR = 34 grids • Three replicates per year (June / July / August) • Two years (2008 & 2009) • Minimum 3 observers • Presence / absence nests = nest searches 3x per year also

  3. Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 Kimberly Drive Marsh

  4. SALS Nest Data: • Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 • More extensive refuge-wide nest searching • SHARP Project 2011 – 13 •  Focused efforts mainly in demographic plots JH Chafee NWR

  5. Kimberly Drive - JHC • More pristine marsh • Higher proportion of high marsh habitat • Higher nest success rates • How much management should we do in this area? Drain some of the pools & pannes?

  6. Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 West Sprague Bridge/ Sedge Island – JHC

  7. West Sprague Bridge/ Sedge Island – JHC • Both high and low marsh habitat • High marsh is more patchy • Locally dense populations of sparrows • Some land ownership by Audubon Soc. • Can we raise elevation of low marsh in this area without detriment to current nesting habitat? • Should drain pannes and/or cattail marsh?

  8. Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 Starr Drive – JHC

  9. Starr Drive – JHC • May have lower densities of sparrows • Mostly low marsh habitat • Beginning to see rapid deterioration of shorelines (possibly due in part to high nutrient levels?)

  10. Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 South Middle Bridge – JHC

  11. Occupancy Surveys 2008-09 North Middle Bridge – JHC

  12. South Middle bridge/ North Middle bridge – JHC • Isolated patches of high marsh, mainly low marsh • Shoreline deterioration and erosion impacting much of the marsh (SMB) • Potential areas for excavating runnels (particularly NMB) and dredge deposition (SMB) • How and where to place dredge materials?

  13. Vegetation Surveys: • Established 1 ha grids along UTM lines • John H. Chafee NWR = 123 grids • Sachuest Point NWR = 34 grids • Each grid contained 4 - 70m transects (plus center point) • Points were surveyed every 5 meters, each transect contained 14 points • Total of 57 points per grid

  14. Other Salt Marsh Data • Nekton surveys for all of the refuge marshes, (~100 points) • Water level logger data: (3 – JHC, 1 – SPT) • SETs: JHC – 7 measured + 5 new in 2014; SPT – 6 measured • Salinity: limited data collected in 2009 with SMI data and also at nekton samplingsites • Marsh bird surveys: JHC - 9 points, SPT - 1 point

More Related