Web Attacks— Offense… The Whole Story

1. Web Attacks—Offense… The Whole Story Yuri & The Cheeseheads Mark Glubisz, Jason Kemble, Yuri Serdyuk, Kandyce Giordano

2. Introduction • White paper was informative • Contained a few weaknesses • Cited a study that focused on two areas that Symantec was strongest in combating • Lacked detail regarding legitimate web site threats • Missed risks presented by Social Networking sites

3. Stated Goals • Educate end users to make them more secure • Explain types of attacks • Drive by Downloads • Clickjacking • Fake CODECS • Malicious peer-to-peer files • Malicious Advertisements • Fake Scanner Web Pages • Blog Spam • Offer solutions to minimize risk

4. Symantec Funded Study Cascadia Labs • Tested Two Types of Attack • Drive by download • Fake CODECs • What About Other Threats? • Clickjacking • Fake Scanner Web pages • Peer to Peer • Blog Spam

5. Lasting Perception of Results • Results of Study • Presented at End of Paper • Based on two types of Attacks • Reader is aware of all threats • Reader is left with false sense of confidence

6. Infection of Legitimate Websites • White paper lacked statistics • Spoke in generalities regarding level of threat by legitimate websites • We found more specific information • 70% of the 100 most popular websites • Malicious content or hidden redirect • 16% increase over the 1st half of 2008 • Legitimate websites compromised • Exceeds the amount of sites created by criminals

7. Web Site Infection Details cont’d • 45% of the top 100 web sites allow user generated content • Most active distributors of malicious content • Enable criminals to post malicious links, multimedia files, or send malicious e-mails to users • Top 100 web sites in terms of traffic are predominantly two categories • Search Engines • Social Networking Sites

8. Missed Risk Identification • Social Networking Sites • Treasure trove of personal data • Birthdays, location, and employment history • 66% of phishing attacks in the U.S. were directed towards social-networking sites • Impersonating someone else and building up a network • Creating an on-line profile prior to the real person creating one • Using the network to extract personal information to access financial data

9. Social Networking Sites’ Risks cont’d • A means for distributing worms • Koobface • Distributed in 2008 through Facebook • Notes to friends of someone whose PC has been infected • “See how great you look in this video” • Directs recipients to a website that asks them to download a version of Flash Player – infects computer • Takes them to contaminated sites when they try to use search engines like Google, Yahoo, MSN and Live.com

10. Worms through Social Networking • Twitter • Stalkdaily and Mikeyy • Tricked users into clicking on a link to a rival social network • 17 year old created the worm “out of boredom” • Second worm exploited the original flaw • After Twitter claimed to have closed the holes • These sites are vulnerable

11. Conclusion • Overall white paper is informative • Weaknesses • Limited study presented in article • Lack of details regarding legitimate web site risks • Missed risk • Social Networking Sites

12. Existing Countermeasure Missed(from T’Bone and Tonic) • Plethora of third party security tools that exist to prevent some of such attacks • the “No Script” extension for the Mozilla browser • Lavasoft Ad-Aware and Spybot S&D

13. References • Number of compromised websites at all-time high • http://www.securecomputing.net.au/News/135019,websense-number-of-compromised-websites-at-alltime-high.aspx • Phishers Attack Social Networking Generation • http://software.silicon.com/malware/0,3800003100,39185353,00.htm • Destructive Koobface Virus Turns Up On Facebook • http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE4B37LV20081204 • Teen Takes Responsibility for Twitter Worms • http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10217684-83.html • Fake Social Network Profiles: a New Form of Identity Theft • http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fake_social_network_profiles_a.php

14. Questions?