1 / 31

Core! What a Scorcher!

Core! What a Scorcher!. Inner Shell Processes in Molecules P.A. Hatherly University of Reading. Outline. Core ionisation phenomena in molecules Electronic and fragmentation processes Techniques Soft x-ray sources, data collection Example results State-selective experiments

ardice
Download Presentation

Core! What a Scorcher!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Core! What a Scorcher! Inner Shell Processes in Molecules P.A. Hatherly University of Reading

  2. Outline • Core ionisation phenomena in molecules • Electronic and fragmentation processes • Techniques • Soft x-ray sources, data collection • Example results • State-selective experiments • Electron dynamics

  3. M Auger Electron M L L M Energy L Photo-Electron K K K KLL Auger Decay Shake-Up Post-Collision Interaction Core Ionisation Phenomena • Electronic Processes

  4. O 1s S 2p C 1s O C S Core Ionisation Phenomena • Fragmentation Processes • Photon energies correspond to inner shell ionisation energies of atoms • Energy localisation can occur • e.g., OCS - Three edges

  5. Site Specific Ionisation - CO2 C 1s Photoelectron 2+ Auger electron ? Major Minor + + + +

  6. Soft X-Ray Sources • Synchrotron Radiation • SRS: 5U.1, MPW6.1 • MAX II: I411

  7. Synchrotron Radiation • SRS, Daresbury

  8. Soft X-Ray Sources • Multipole wigglersand undulators

  9. MPW 6.1 PHOENIX • XUV/Soft x-ray beamline on multipole wiggler 6 • Joint Reading/UMIST/Daresbury project • Large photon energy range • (40 - 350 eV) • High flux and resolving power • ~1013 - 1014 ph/s/100mA/0.1%BW • ~10,000 resolving power • First results June 2001

  10. 1.2E+15 MPW6, 7.5 mrad fan 1.0E+15 8.0E+14 6.0E+14 5U, full aperture, tuning envelope 4.0E+14 2.0E+14 SRS bending magnet, 7.5 mrad fan 0.0E+00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Photon energy, eV MPW6.1 PHOENIX • Performance - Wiggler Output

  11. MPW6.1 PHOENIX • Performance - Beamline MPW6 5D

  12. MPW 6.1 - PHOENIX • Carbon contamination

  13. Data Collection • Single-Particle Detection • Ion drift tubes, threshold and energetic electron analysers • Multi-Particle Detection • Coincidence techniques • Threshold Electron-Ion Coincidence • Auger Electron-Ion Coincidence

  14. Threshold Electron Detection • Detect electrons with < 10meV kinetic energy • Tune photons to exactly the energy required • State selectivity • Only one initial state is selected • In conventional PES, many states are excited

  15. Auger Electron Detection • Detect electrons with characteristic energies • For C 1s ionised molecules, typically ~250 eV • Auger spectrum independent of photon energy • Intensities may vary • Selects final state

  16. Ion Detection • Wiley and McLaren configurationwhere:A and B are constants dependent on the geometry,m and q are the mass and charge of the ion, V is the potential applied to the field-free region and;where Pll is the component of momentum parallel to the drift tube axis +40 V 1 cm -40 V 1 cm 5.5 cm -97.5 V 1 cm 1 cm MCPs

  17. t1 t2 Coincidence Studies Electron signal Start Electron detector Stop TDC +V1 SR Gating electronics -V1 Electron rate -V2 Ion rate Counter Ion drift tube Ion signal electrons t1 t2 ions

  18. Example Results • Triatomic Molecules • OCS • Threshold electron - ion studies • CO2 • Auger electron - ion studies • Satellite threshold electron structure

  19. OCS - Site-Specific Ionisation Strong OCS2+ at S 2p edges Absent at C1s, but returning at O 1s Variation in yields of C+

  20. CO2 - Auger Electron - Ion Low Auger energy, high fragmentationHigh Auger energy,low fragmentation Low Auger energy, energetic O+High Auger energy,low energy O+

  21. CO2 - Auger Electron-Ion

  22. CO2 Shake-up Satellites • Shake-up satellites in carbon dioxide • Core ionisation above threshold • sufficient energy to excite a second electron • Auger decay fills core hole • electron dynamics • timescales of decay

  23. 0.015 * Threshold electron yield p C 1s resonance Total ion yield 0.010 C 1s Threshold (a) 0.015 TPE yield (arb.units) Shake-up satellites 0.005 Double excitation 0.010 0.000 Total ion yield (arb. units) (b) 0.005 * s C 1s resonance 0.000 285 290 295 300 305 310 315 320 Photon Energy (eV) CO2 - C 1s Satellite TPES

  24. CO2 - C 1s Satellites TPES S4 S2 S3 S1 S’ S0

  25. CO2 - C 1s Satellites TPES • S0 - S4 seen in photoelectron studies • S’ is a new feature, only seen in TPES • Origin? • Split from either S4 or S1? • New transition? • Absolute cross sections obtained • previously only down to 5 eV above threshold

  26. CO2 - C 1s Satellites TPES • Electron dynamics • Identify satellites with known states of molecular ions • Infer fast versus slow core hole decays via “Frozen Core” approach • relative timescales of threshold electron escape, shake-up and Auger decay

  27. Electron Dynamics • Fast processes match CO2+ • photoelectron escape and shake-up on the sametimescale as Auger decay • Inner core looks like C

  28. Electron Dynamics • Slow processes match NO2+ • photoelectron escapes beforeAuger decay • Inner core looks like N

  29. Conclusions • Core processes in molecules provide insight into energy localisation and transport • Site-specific processes • State-to-state studies via threshold and Auger electron coincidence experiments • Study of electron dynamics via satellite states

  30. Conclusions • Many new possibilities opening in the future • Study of transient species • Application to organic systems • New sources permitting new science • FELs - multiphoton processes in the XUV/SXR • Attosecond (10-18s) lasers allowing direct probes of electron dynamics

  31. With Thanks to: • Research Students • Dan Collins, Barry Fisher, Mark Thomas • International Colleagues • Marek Stankiewicz (Poland), Jaume Rius i Riu (Spain, Sweden), Peter Erman and Elisabeth Kallne (Sweden) • Technical Support • Mick Millard • CLRC staff at Daresbury • Especially Frances Quinn (MPW6.1 Project Manager) • EPSRC • Funding for beamline construction and research programme

More Related