160 likes | 276 Views
Evaluate new attractants in SIT programms. Rui Pereira. Jackson trap with trimedlure. Standard. Extensive adult mass trapping. Results. Distribution of the flies Ratio Sterile:Wild Wild population levels Wild population detection. Marked. Unmarked. Wild. Sterile. Males.
E N D
Evaluate new attractants in SIT programms Rui Pereira
Jackson trap with trimedlure Standard Extensiveadultmasstrapping
Results • Distribution of the flies • Ratio Sterile:Wild • Wild population levels • Wild population detection
Marked Unmarked Wild Sterile Males
Major faults • Use of florescent dye causes reduced fly • Cost of separating the males
Recent developments • Availability of GSS • Control Programs • Female attractants
Dry traps with female attractants Tephri Traps Traps
Female attractants TCL • Putrescine • Ammonium acetate • Trimetylamine
Females catch are wild If GSS is used
Madeira-Med (1999) • Females released (1.8%) • Traps serviced (5,508) • Females catch (154,035) • Percentage of sterile females (0.66%)
(wild + sterile) (all wild) Total flies (250) (192) (58) wild= 0.72 (0.72 x 58) = 42 sterile= total – wild (192 – 42) = 150
Conclusion:(Advantages of unmarked pupae) • Increase the quality of the flies • Cost reduction • Increase the quality of the work (reduce the risk of allergies)