1 / 2

Presentation Schedule 15 minutes + 5 minutes for questions

Presentation Schedule 15 minutes + 5 minutes for questions. March 11 Haegele : Bicycle Chainrings Chen: Transportation logistics of forest harvest residues Oleson : Sugar from wood biomass Naito: FSAE racecar Parrish: Aircraft fuselages Owen: Aircraft engines. March 13

ardice
Download Presentation

Presentation Schedule 15 minutes + 5 minutes for questions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation Schedule15 minutes + 5 minutes for questions • March 11 • Haegele: Bicycle Chainrings • Chen: Transportation logistics of forest harvest residues • Oleson: Sugar from wood biomass • Naito: FSAE racecar • Parrish: Aircraft fuselages • Owen: Aircraft engines • March 13 • Dou: Bioethanol • Yasuda: Shape memory alloy • Olsufka: LED lighting • Sifford: Biofuel from slash piles in the forest • Wesley: Urea fertilizer production

  2. What to include in your presentation • 15 minutes = about 8 slides • Intro • Technology description/ picture + study goal • Functional unit • Brief review of previous LCAs • Scope • Life cycle processes (flow diagram) • Data sources • Omissions/ cutoff • Impact results (h vectors) • Contribution analysis (identification of “significant issues”) • March 13 presentations: Evaluation of importance of completeness, consistency, and quality of the data • Conclusions • Can you really hope to say something is better or worse? • Can you really make recommendations for improving the system(s)? • What data are missing or need to be improved? • Optional: Sensitivity for 1-3 parameters (what if the energy efficiency of your core process were improved? A valid conclusion is that it makes no difference, and other actions should be sought for improvement.)

More Related