1 / 10

Context

argus
Download Presentation

Context

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post-legislative Scrutiny of the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003Calum Macleod1, Tim Braunholtz-Speight2, Issie Macphail2, Derek Flyn, Sarah Allen3 and Davie Macleod31 Centre for Mountain Studies, Perth College UHI 2 UHI Centre for Remote and Rural Studies 3 Rural Analysis Associates UHI Research and Postgraduate ConferenceCOMMUNITIES, COASTS AND MOUNTAINSWednesday 27th – Friday 29th October 2010Moray College UHI, Elgin

  2. Context Land Reform (Scotland) Act passed in 2003 • Part One – outdoor access rights and responsibilities • Part Two – community right to buy • Part Three – crofting community right to buy Scottish Parliament Rural Affairs and Environment Committee • looking at “post-legislative scrutiny” of the Act • This report a first stage in that process

  3. Methods • Expert interviews • Online surveys • Local Access Fora, National Access Forum, Local Authorities; • community groups with various experiences of the Act, and those who have purchased outwith • Semi-structured interviews • Similar range to surveys • Secondary data • e.g. Scottish Government data on Right to Buy registrations

  4. Outdoor Access Largely working well…. • Perception that the legislation has gradually improved relations between access-takers and land managers. • Some concerns that Access Authorities reluctant to settle disputes through courts – financial risk a factor • Continued ‘hotspot’ issues – irresponsible camping etc. • But little appetite for changes in the legislation

  5. Outdoor Access For example: “The LRSA has assisted in the resolution of local access disputes between access-takers and land managers” Local Access Forum members (N=80)

  6. Part Two – Community Right to Buy Uptake

  7. Community Right to Buy • Has been used, across Scotland – but most community land transfer outwith the Act • Majority of successful purchases involve public bodies • Feeling that cost and risk – time, expense and local landowner-community relations – outweighed uncertain benefits • Changes – iron out inconsistencies; simplify; treat as emergency tool and therefore ‘late’ registrations as ‘normal’.

  8. Part Three – Crofting Community Right to Buy Very limited uptake • 2 applications to use it • 1 groups used it in negotiations but purchased land outwith the Act (Galson Estate Trust) • 1 group actively pursuing full use at present (Pairc Trust) – seen as a “test case” • Some other crofting community land purchases cite Act as helpful – but purchase outwith the Act seen as quicker and simpler

  9. Crofting Community Right to Buy Barriers to uptake and suggestions for change • Complex and costly administrative requirements – esp mapping – more expensive than the land itself?? • Legal uncertainty – current case involving disputes over European Convention on Human Rights… • Simplification the major call for change • Fear among community groups that otherwise Part Three may become defunct as “unworkable”

  10. Read more: Full report and Executive Summary available from: • Rural Affairs and Environment Committee http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/s3/committees/rae/currentInquiries.htm • CRRS http://www.crrs.uhi.ac.uk/publications/reports/reports-and-other-papers

More Related