260 likes | 389 Views
ROLES OF HEADS AND DEANS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIVERSITY. A PRESENTATION AT THE WORKSHOP FOR PROVOSTS, DEANS & HODS BY KOBBY YEBO OKRAH REGISTRAR. February 19, 2013 At 10:00.a.m. Conference Room, Great Hall. PRESENTATION OUTLINE. Introduction Definition of terms
E N D
ROLES OF HEADS AND DEANS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIVERSITY A PRESENTATION AT THE WORKSHOP FOR PROVOSTS, DEANS & HODS BY KOBBY YEBO OKRAH REGISTRAR February 19, 2013 At 10:00.a.m. Conference Room, Great Hall
PRESENTATION OUTLINE • Introduction • Definition of terms • Appointments of Heads • Roles & Responsibilities • Weakness in the System • A way out • Conclusion
INTRODUCTION • Governance of Higher Education by Committee System • Major Committees- Council, Academic Board, Welfare Service Board & their Sub-Committees • College Board • Faculty Board/ Departmental Board
DEPARTMENT • A Department is an establishment that has responsibility for undergraduate and graduate level teaching and research. • The HOD is appointed by Council on the recommendation of the Academic Board.
HOD’S TERM OF OFFICE • A Head of Department shall hold office for a term of up to two years subject to re-appointment for another term of two years for a Professor and one year subject to re-appointment for another term of one year for other categories of Senior Members (Academic).
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES(Cont.) • Subject to the powers of the Faculty/School Board and the Academic Board, a Head shall have the following responsibilities: • Organizing the approved teaching and research program of the Department and ensure that the research is carried out; • Maintaining acceptable standards of teaching and any other academic work;
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES(Cont.) • Providing for examinations of students; • Liaising with the Dean of the Faculty/School in matters affecting the Department; • Convening meetings of the Department for purposes of planning and evaluating activities of the Department; • Providing leadership, maintaining and promoting efficiency and good order in the Department in accordance with the policies and procedure of the University;
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES(Cont.) • Advancing and promoting generally the well-being of the Department and persons engaged in the Department; and, • Being responsible for the general administration of the Department in respect of human, financial and material resources of the Department within the general framework of the University policy.
FACULTY/SCHOOL/INSTITUTE • A Faculty is a collection of related Departments, Centers and Institutes as specified in the Schedule C2 of the Statutes of the University.
APPOINTMENT OF DEAN • A Faculty is headed by a Dean who is appointed amongst the Academic Senior members of the Faculty (for a 3-Tier College) who are Professors( other lower category of Senior members –Academic may be considered) in accordance with the provisions of Schedule E of the University Statutes.
TERM OF OFFICE • The term of office of a Dean is two years subject to re-election and re-appointment for another term of two years for a Professor and one year subject to re-election and re-appointment for another term of one year for other lower categories Senior Members (Academic).
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES • The Dean is responsible to the Provost ( for a 3-Tier College) and has the following responsibilities: • Providing leadership to the Faculty; • Maintaining and Promoting efficiency and good order of the Faculty in accordance with the policies and procedures of the University; • Ensuring that the approved program and services of the Faculty are duly carried out by its members;
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES(Cont.) • General administration of the Faculty in respect of human, financial and material resources of the Faculty within the general framework of the University; • Recommending Staff for appointments and promotions; • Administering graduate training and ensuring that adequate facilities are available for research in their respective disciplines;
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES(Cont.) • Maintaining discipline in the Faculty in accordance with approved regulations; • In collaboration with the Provost, liaising with industries, professional associations/ institutions and similar bodies and organizing consultative meeting of Faculty members and industrial experts in the various professional fields within the Faculty; and, • In consultation with Heads Department, liaising with other Faculties for organization of common courses.
WEAKNESS IN THE SYSTEM • Short term of office; • Rotational problem; • Election versus Appointments of officers; • Quality of leadership; • Substantive versus Acting position; • Inadequate funding
WEAKNESS IN THE SYSTEM (cont.) • Inadequate Staffing • Run down infrastructure • Bureaucracy • Poor information flow • High administrative cost
A WAY OUT • Review of Term of office up to 3 years plus 2 years( Professor) as to allow for effective planning and policy development • Appointment of substantive Directors for Institutes/Research Centres by Advertisement with Term of office and renewals instead of adhoc/rotational system currently in place.
A WAY OUT( Cont.) • Rotation system must be reviewed/abolished and appointment by merit and not by position and pecking order instituted • Review of procedure for Deanship appointment by interview through adverts as done with SMS/KSB/Law/ Dental School, etc.
A WAY OUT • Headship/Deanship appointment without substantive holders be termed as Acting; • Mandatory training, both internal/external( GIMPA/MDPI) be organized for all new appointees to positions of responsibility; • Income generation through consultancies/Research & development activities to meet funding shortfalls etc
A WAY OUT(Cont.) • Aggressive/conscious/systematic programme or policy on Staff recruitment/ Staff training & development • Proper delineation of lines of communication and information flow in the Faculty/Department • Determination of critical mass of Administrative support Staff for the colleges/Faculty/Department
A WAY OUT(Cont.) • Provision of Faculty officers at the level of AR/SAR to Faculties/Institutes • Freeing Deans/HODs/Directors of mundane administrative chores for critical Academic policy development and research & development programmes/consultancies
CONCLUSION • The world of learning and the comity of academics are dynamic and changing rapidly; • KNUST cannot continue to play the ostrich and hope to be at the table of men of repute and international recognition in the world of academia; • KNUST stays at post and lives in the past at its own peril;
CONCLUSION (Cont.) • KNUST has what it takes and the technological know-how and advantage to be a world class university – a Centre of Excellence for Science and Technology Education and Training; • KNUST is far but no further in its search to become a university of Destiny
CONCLUSION • KNUST as a system has its own challenges and aspirations. It would need the bold and pragmatic policy shift and concerted effort of all in order to realize its vision: Advancing knowledge in Science and Technology for sustainable development in Africa.