720 likes | 937 Views
Chapter 14 Decision Making. Applying Probabilities to the Decision-Making Process in the face of uncertainty.
E N D
Chapter 14 Decision Making Applying Probabilities to the Decision-Making Process in the face of uncertainty.
In order to make the best decision, with the informationavailable, the decision maker utilizes certain decision strategies to evaluate the possible benefits and losses of each alternative.
When making a decision in the face of uncertainty, ask: • What are my possible Alternatives or Courses of Action? 2)How can the future affect each action?
What are my possible Alternatives or Courses of Action? Before selecting a course of action, the decision maker must have at least two possible alternatives to evaluate before making his choice.
Example: I want to invest $1 million for 1 year. I narrow my choices to three alternatives (actions): Alternative 1: Invest in guaranteed income certificate paying 10%. Alternative 2: Invest in a bond with a coupon value of 8%. Alternative 3: Invest in a well-diversified portfolio of stocks.
The Alternatives (Actions) are under the decision maker’s control.
Unless you’ve got a crystal ball Future uncertainties may derail the most perfect of plans.
These future events are also referred to as States of Nature
Example: Economic conditions, foremost among which is interest rates. Interest rates increase. Interest rates stay the same. Interest rates decrease.
To account for future uncertainties (events) We assign probabilities to measure the likelihood of a future event occurring.
Future events (states of nature or outcomes), are out of the decision maker’s control and often strictly a matter of chance.
Yet, the impact of these events Affect the payoffs/losses which determine the decision making process.
The action (alternative) is under the decision maker’s control. The event (state of nature) that ultimately occurs is strictly a matter of chance. Important Distinction!
Associated with each alternative (action) and event (state of nature) is a corresponding payoff or profit.
If I could predict the future with certainty, I would choose the alternative with the highest payoff (profit).
Instead of focusing on profits, I could look at the Opportunity Lossassociated with each combination of an alternative and the economic condition affecting that alternative’s profitability.
Opportunity Loss The difference between the profit I made on the alternative I chose and the profit I could have made hadthe best decision been made.
NOTE: Since Opportunity Loss is the difference between two decisions, it can not be expressed as a negative number.
If I could predict the future with certainty, I would choose the alternative (action) with the highest payoff or lowest loss.
In many decision problems, it is impossible to assign Empirical probabilities to the economic events, or states of nature, that affect profits and losses. In many cases, probabilities are assigned Subjectively.
Using probabilities, we calculate the Expected Monetary Value for each alternative or action.
To maximize profits, choose the Alternative with the highestEMV.
If the investment is made a large number of times (infinite) with bonds, * 20% of the investments will result in a $50,000 loss, * 50% will result in an $80,000 profit, and * 30 % will result in $180,000 profit. The average of all these investments is the EMV of $84,000.
To minimize losses, choose the Alternative with the lowest EOL.
Example A vendor at a baseball game must determine whether to sell ice cream or soft drinks at today’s game. The vendor believes that theprofitmade willdepend on the weather.
Based on past experience at this time of year, the vendor estimates the probability of warm weather as 60%.
Compute the EMV for selling soft drinks and selling ice cream. • Compute the EOL for selling soft drinks and ice cream. • Based on the previous results, which should the vendor sell, ice cream or soft drinks? Why?
EMV EMV (soft drinks) = .4(50) + .6(60) = 20 + 36 = $56 EMV (ice cream) = .4(30) + .6(90) = 12 + 54 = $66 Sell ice cream
The Value of Additional Information If we knew in advance which future event or state of nature would occur, we would capitalize on this knowledge and maximize our profits/minimize our losses.
But our “knowledge” of future events or states of nature is sometimes tenuous at best. Leaving us to ask ourselves, “Am I making the best decision?”
To determine which course of action (alternative) to select, we assign probabilities to the likelihood of each future event occurring.
Probabilities are assigned based on : • past data, • the subjective opinion of the decision maker, • Or knowledge about the probability distribution that the event may follow.
Better information makes better decisions. But what are you willing to pay?
Data is costly to acquire: * Money & time • Cognitive energy • Staff effort • Opportunity costs of failing to do other things with the money or time.
Goal is to gather data as long as: the MARGINAL COST is NO MORE than the MARGINAL BENEFITS of the additional data.
At some point, data gathering must stop and the decision must be made.
Expected Payoff with Perfect Information (EPPI) EPPI is the maximum price that a decision maker should be willing to pay for perfect information.
With perfect information, I would knowwhat to expect so I would select the optimum course of action for each future event.
If the Expected Profit Under Certainty (EPPI) is the profit I expect to make if have perfect information about which event will occur, how much should I be willing to pay for this “perfect” information?
The $134,000 does NOT represent the MAXIMUM amount I’d be willing to pay for perfect information because I could have made an expected profit of EMV= $100,000WITHOUT perfect information.
Expected Value of Perfect Information EVPI = EPPI – EMV* = $134,000 - $100,000 = $34,000 If perfect information were available, the decision maker should be willing to pay up to $34,000 to acquire it.