170 likes | 395 Views
Stockholm Arlanda and Bromma Airports and their future role. Reykjavik 2012-01-19 Henrik Littorin Senior Analyst henrik.littorin@swedavia.se +46 734 33 19 98. Topics. The long-term agreement at Bromma Stockholm Airport
E N D
Stockholm Arlanda and Bromma Airports and theirfuturerole Reykjavik 2012-01-19 Henrik Littorin Senior Analyst henrik.littorin@swedavia.se +46 734 33 19 98
Topics • The long-term agreement at Bromma Stockholm Airport • The environmentalpermit and restrictions at Stockholm Arlanda Airport • The economicimportanceof Arlanda and Bromma Airports • The logicbehindtwoairports in the capital area • Future strategies for the airports
Swedavia’srole and task • Founded 2010 as a consequence of the breakup of LFV Group. • Develop the transport sector and help achieve Swedish transport policy goals based on sound business principles. • Return on equity of 9 per cent required. • 10 airports in the national basic airport infrastructure, from Malmö in the south to Kiruna in the north.
Arlanda 19 mpax (4,7 domestic, 14,3 international) 213 000 movements (99% scheduled and charter) 32 domestic 140 international Hub airport withlarge regional cathment area Bromma 2,2 mpax (2 domestic, 0,2 international) 68 000 movements (66% scheduled and charter) 15 domestic 4 international City centre airport
Bromma Stockholm Airport - History • 1936 – Inaugurated • 1946 – SAS is founded and basetheirSwedish operations at Bromma. • 1962 – International flights moveto the newlybuilt Arlanda Airport. • 1983-1992 – No scheduled operations at Bromma. • 1994 – Permission for operations until 2011 – domestic operations return. • 1994 – 2008 Almost no investmentsmadeduetouncertaintyabout the future.
The long-term agreement at Bromma Stockholm Airport • Old permit valid until 2011 • Eitherinvest in the airport or close it and use the area for houses and recreationpurposes. • Autumn 2007 • National Airport Commission releases OfficialGovernmentReportwhichsays: ”Bromma is a strategic Swedish airport” • Spring 2008 • A long-term agreementbetween Swedavia (then LFV) and the City of Stockholm for the period 2008 – 2038. • Fiercedebate and required a political decision togain legal validity.
The long-term agreement at Bromma Stockholm Airport • Numberofmovements, emissions and noise limits determined. • Infrastructure in the area nowbeingplannedwithconsiderationto the airport. • 0,5 Euro per departingpassengerpaidto the City of Stockholm as ground rent.
The environmentalpermit and restrictions at Stockholm Arlanda Airport • Major limitations ofaircraftmovements from 2018. • Groundtransportation part of the permission. • No approaches over the urban area Upplands Väsby willdecreasecapacitywith 50 % in peakhours! • The airport has applied for a new permission – final decision probablywithin4 years.
The economicimportanceof Arlanda and Bromma airport • Extensive research has beendone in this area. • The major argument tojustify the airports.
Economicimportanceof Bromma • Strengthenedsince Arlanda has no availableslots in peak. • Focused on business trips and domesticaccessibility. • The valueofcompaniesbeingabletotravelquick and easy. • Valueoftimesaved by travelling from Bromma = 10 million Euros/year. • Valueofscheduled services at Bromma = 150 million Euros/year. • Commercial activityat Bromma = 2,5 million Euros/year. • Employment at Bromma = 35 million Euros/year.
Economicimportanceof Arlanda • National importance (international access and hubfunction). • 20% visitors from abroad or other parts of Sweden. • Visitorsspendmorethan 4 million Euro/day in the region. • Crucialfor international accessibility exports shareof Swedish GDP = 50%. • Increasingimportanceof the airport for companies (increasingshareofforeignownedcompanies). • Catalyst for othersectors in society – economy, culture, recreation, knowledgeexchange, culturalexhange, meeting family and relatives. • Manyfactors hard tovalue in monetary terms.
The logicbehindtwoairports in the capital area • Bromma is an extreme peak airport. • Constrainedcapacity in peakhours at bothairports. • Noneof the airportshaveavailableslots in the morningpeak. • Limitedsuitableinfrastructure at Arlanda tohandle the aircrafttypesthatoperates at Bromma. • = • Impossibletomove present operations from Bromma to Arlanda. • No other airport closeto Stockholm thatcanhandle business aviation.
The logicbehindtwoairports in the capital area • Bromma – 70% Business, 30% Leisure. • Arlanda – 40% Business, 60% Leisure. • Muchhighershareofveryfrequent, commuting and wellpreparedpassengers at Bromma. • Short distances, short check-in times and almost no securityqueues at Bromma. • Muchshortertraveltime door-to-door at domestic routes from Bromma than at Arlanda. • Bromma caters for business aviation, air ambulance, governmental and officialaviationoperations – not suitableto mix withscheduled jet operations at a slotcontrolled airport like Arlanda.
Future challengesat Bromma Airport • No availableslots in peakhours. • Maximum numberof jet movementsalmostreached. • New, larger and quiteraircraftsneededtomeetpassengerdemand. • Huge investment program (massive renovation and some expansion). • Light railwayconnecting the airport in 2017. • Hotels, conferencefacilities and large shopping areas beingbuilt in the surroundings. • Relocationof general aviation(hostiledebate and requirespolitical decision).
Future challenges at Arlanda Airport • A new permission for the airport operations. • Increase the passengerexperience and passenger process. • Large and outstretched terminal system – expensive andcreateslogistic problems. • Improvegroundtransportationto and from the airport. • Catch the increasingpassengerflow from AsiatoEurope (fiercecompetitionwithother major airports in NorthernEurope).
Summary • A capital area havemany different air transportationneeds. • Difficulttomix all kind of airport operations at one airport. • Peak traffic is a major challenge. • Bromma relieves Arlanda. • Major challenges at Bromma: Noise, safety, interaction in the city planning and managing general aviationand business aviation. • Never optimal tointegrate an airport in an urban area. • Long term institutionalstabilityimportanteitherif it is ”good” or ”bad”.
Takk! Reykjavik 2012-01-19 Henrik Littorin Senior Analyst henrik.littorin@swedavia.se +46 734 33 19 98