1 / 66

Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. 충북대학교 의과대학 흉부외과 홍 종 면. “ Most often the entire valve appears normal;… There is little to fix, yet the valve leaks… the valve is structurally normal; it need not be replaced, but currently we do not know how to fix it…”

arista
Download Presentation

Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation 충북대학교 의과대학 흉부외과 홍 종 면

  2. “ Most often the entire valve appears normal;… There is little to fix, yet the valve leaks… the valve is structurally normal; it need not be replaced, but currently we do not know how to fix it…” • - L. Henry Edmunds Jr. 1997 (Cardiac Surgery in the Adult)

  3. Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation(IMR) • Life-threatening ; ventricular ds, not valvular • Limits functional capability & life expectancy - if CHF (+), 52% 1 yr mortality with medication • Suboptimal long-term results (50% in 5 YSR) • Tremendous consumption of health care sources - D. Craig Miller, JTCS ‘01

  4. Significance of IMR after AMI(SAVE trial -substudy) No MR (n=586) MR (n=141) P=0.0022 Lamas et al., Circulation, 1997.

  5. IMR after PCI for acute MI CADILLAC trial (PCI, 2000 pts), JACC 2004,

  6. Subdivision of IMR • Ruptured PM • Infarcted PM w/o rupture • Functional regurgitation - normal PM, chordae, & leaflets but, fail to coapt (type I & IIIb)

  7. Definition of Functional IMR • MR caused by CAD • Previous MI >30 days before CABG • r/o rheumatic, infectious, or degenerative (myxomatous) mitral disease • r/o PM rupture or elongation • Lam, Guillinov, et al, CCF, ATS ’05

  8. Definition of FIMR (2) • Normal-appearing valve leaflets, chordae, & PMs • MR caused MI - at least one previous MI from : 1) review of clinical information, 2) echo, 3) direct surgical inspection Gillinov et al., CCF, ATS ‘05

  9. Definition of Moderate IMR • Significant sx (+) multivessel CAD, w/ or w/o documented prior MI • Gr 3+ MR ( 0 ~ 4+) - documented on preop echo or VG while not actively ischemic - regurgitant jet to LA w/o reversal or blunting of PV flow - no MS • Type I or IIIb • Aklog et al., Harvard Medical School, Circ ‘01

  10. Causes of FIMR • Annular dilatation (type I) • Leaflet tethering (type IIIb) • both

  11. Coronary Revasc. & IMR Background • Mitral Insufficiency and CABG • Dilemma • Mortality and morbidity • Neglected  long-term mortality • Lack of consensus on… “When to operate?”

  12. Coronary Revasc. & IMR Gold Standard • Ischemic MR grade 3-4 • Carpentier type IIIb dysfunction • Reduction annuloplasty

  13. Coronary Revasc. & IMR Moderate Ischemic MR (2+) • No gold standard • Remodeling annuloplasty optional • Pros • Cons

  14. CABG alone (1) Revascularization alone suffices with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy & mild-to-mod IMR “Revascularization alone suffices in patients with advancehy and mild-to-moderatTolis GA, Yale Univ (ATS 2002) Clinical + echographic outcome - 49 patients - 1-3+ MR - LVEF < 30% - MR 1+: 18 (38%) pts 2+: 26 (52%) pts 3+: 5 (10%) pts Op. mort.: 2% LVEF: 31% (22%) MR: 1.73  0.54 (p<0.05) Survival: 50% (5 years) Conclusion: - Advanced ischemic cardiomypathy - Mild to moderate MR - Isolated CABG - Reasonable option

  15. CABG alone (2) “The importance of gr. 2+ IMR in CABG” Ryden T (Eur J Cardiothorac 2001) Grade 2+ IMR - Case-control study - MR vs. no MR (n=89) - Matched: Age, gender, LVEF MR patients: - Older (68 vs. 65yrs) - Lower LVEF ( 42 vs. 58%) Kaplan-Meier: MR vs. none - 30 days mort.: 4.5% vs. 4.5% - 1 year surviv.: 91 vs. 93% - 3 year surviv.: 84 vs. 88% NYHA: similar improvement MR pts: - 62% reduced MR - 36% unchanged - 2% inccreased Conclusion: - Similar morbidity - Similar survival - MR reduced or unchanged - Support conservative treatment

  16. CABG alone (3) “ MV repair vs. revascularization alone in the treatment of IMR “ • Whether adjunctive MV repair with CABG is beneficial ? Kang DH, Asan Medical Center, Circ ’06 • 107 pts with mod or severe IMR • 50 (with repair) vs 57 CABG only • - higher Af & severe MR in repair gp repair only CABG Op. mort.: 12 % 2 % 5 YSR : 88 % 87 % Improving MR : all 67 % in severe MR 75 % 67 % in mod. MR Conclusion: - CABG alone may be preferable option in moderate IMR & high risk factors such as old age or Af

  17. with MV repair (1) “Does CABG alone correct moderate IMR?” Aklog L, Brigham & women’s hospital (Circ ‘01) Optimal Tx of moderate 3+ MR - 136 patients - 70 years - NYHA: 2.7 - LVEF: 38% Op. mort.: 2.9% Residual MR: 40%  3+4+ 51%  2+ 9%  0+ Conclusion: - WithCABG alone - Significant residual MR - Not optimal

  18. with MV repair (2) 535 pts undergoing MV repair ( primarily rigid ring annuloplasty) - 1993 to 2002 - IMR 141 pts vs. non-ischemic 394 pts IMR pts had ; - older age, higher comorbidity, lower EF, higher NYHA & reop rate (all p<0.001) - higher 30-day mortality (4.3% vs 1.3%, p=.01) - higher unadjusted 5-yr mortality (44% vs. 16%) Patient Survival characteristics after routine MV repair for IMR - whether IMR remains an independent predictor of outcome after valve repair Donald D. Glower, Duke Univ Medical center (JTCS ‘05), In multivariable models ; - only No. of preop. comorbidities & advanced age were independent factors of survival (p < 0.0001) • Conclusion • with routine application of rigid ring annuloplasty, • long-term survival is more influenced by • baseline pt characteristics & comorbidity than • by ischemic cause of MR per se.

  19. OPCAB and IMR What should we do? • Moderate-severe ischemic MR and CAD should be fixed • Moderate ischemic MR is still a difficult problem to treat

  20. Conventional CABG and IMR Conventional CPB Surgery • If MR is not fixed • Not necessarily problematic • IABP and inotrops may be needed • The patient could get by… on short-term “What about OPCAB?”

  21. OPCAB and IMR OPCAB surgery • If ischemic MR ignored • Could be problematic • Manipulation and ischemia exacerbates MR • Cause severe hemodynamic instability • Conversion to CPB needed

  22. OPCAB and IMR “ Perioperative and long-term outcomes after isolated OPCABwith mild to moderate IMR ” Cartier R, Montreal Heart Institute - 67 pts (6.7%) with mild or moderate IMR among 1000 consecutive OPCAB - To evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes (survival & MACE-free) • OPCAB pts with mild-to-moderate IMR • Had  prevalence of preoperative risk factors • Comparable perioperative mortality and morbidity •  long-term survival compare to no-IMR pts • OPCAB pts with mild-to-moderate IMR • IMR itself was not found a significant risk for • the long-term mortality

  23. Repair vs. MVR for IMR • Guillinov AM et al, CCF, JTCS ’01 • IMR ; n=482 (’85~’97, 397 repair vs. 85 MVR) • Functional IMR in 65 % • Central MR jet (type I) in 58% • Complex jet (type IIIb) in 15% • Repair pts very different from MVR (NYHA I-II, FIMR, ITA graft, non-emergent)

  24. Repair vs. MVR for IMR • Operative 30 day mortality - 13% • Risk fc for death : older age, higher NYHA, LV dysfunction, renal dysfunction, Af, and MVR • Mortality risk fc after repair : complex MR jet, lateral LV dysfunction, pericardial annuloplasty (no ring), no ITA graft

  25. Repair vs. MVR for IMR • Medium-term survival is still poor • Most pts benefit from repair • But, survival similar btw repair & MVR in the sickest pts • Durability of repair ; 91% at 5 yrs

  26. MGH thrust #1 -“ Guerrero procedure” • Design of a New Surgical approach for ventricular remodeling to relieve IMR : insight from 3-D echo Guerrero JL et al, MGH, Circ 2000

  27. MGH thrust #2 -2o chordae cutting to AMVL • Chordal cutting : A New therapeutic approach for IMR Messas, Gerrero, MGH, Circ 2001

  28. MGH thrust #3 -External balloon-inflated patch “reverse remodeling” • Reverse ventricular remodeling reduces IMR : echo-guided device application in the beating heart Hung J, Guerrero, et al, MGH, Circ ‘02

More Related