60 likes | 253 Views
Annual Report Template Workgroup. 2009 TA Institute Breakout Session June 2 Bob Bacon Jennifer Johnson and Workgroup Members. Annual Report Workgroup Members. Bob Bacon, Center for Disabilities and Development, Iowa Daniel Bier, Waisman Center, Wisconsin
E N D
Annual Report Template Workgroup 2009 TA Institute Breakout Session June 2 Bob Bacon Jennifer Johnson and Workgroup Members
Annual Report Workgroup Members • Bob Bacon, Center for Disabilities and Development, Iowa • Daniel Bier, Waisman Center, Wisconsin • Elizabeth Bishop, Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities, Tennessee • Robyn Carroll, The Elizabeth M. Boggs Center on Developmental Disabilities, New Jersey • Jean Johnson, Center on Disability Studies, Hawaii • Barbara Le Roy, Developmental Disabilities Institute, Michigan • Olivia Raynor, Tarjan Center for Developmental Disabilities, California • Penny Seay, Texas Center for Disabilities Studies, Texas • Barbara Wheeler, USC UCEDD, California • Valerie Williams, Center for Interdisciplinary Learning and Leadership, Oklahoma • M. Bryce Fifield, Center for Persons with Disabilities, Utah
Intended Workgroup Outcomes • UCEDD program will have a revised template, based on an updated Logic Model and appropriate measures, to facilitate the process for reporting progress on an annual basis. • The revised template will provide more accurate data on UCEDD core function outcomes as a result of the development of a clearer definitions and directions for collecting data and reporting on activities. • ADD, the UCEDDs, and other stakeholders will be able to use the data to better show the impact of UCEDD activities on individuals with DD, families, and others. • There will be a meaningful and efficient link between the Annual Report (and needed data collection) and the independent evaluation of the UCEDD network (i.e. PART/DDPIE).
Walking… through…. the Model
Questions for Consideration • In order for the independent evaluation of the UCEDD network to be based on the independent validation of data collected from current reporting requirements, we must improve the validity and reliability of current data collection practices. Can we commit to this as a network? • We must do a better job of telling our story in terms of impact. Will redesigning the Final Report to summarize intermediate outcomes help us do this? • Does it make sense to frame our Annual Reports in terms of the core functions and our Final Reports by areas of emphasis? • Could there be a constructive relationship between a UCEDD’s Final Report and its next Five Year Plan?