1 / 34

Electron Cloud Simulations for DA F NE

Electron Cloud Simulations for DA F NE. T. Demma INFN-LNF Thanks to K. Ohmi (KEK) Work supported in part by the “Ministero degli Affari Esteri, Direzione Generale per la Promozione e la Cooperazione Culturale”. Plan of talk. Introduction ECLOUD Simulations for the DAFNE wiggler

arleen
Download Presentation

Electron Cloud Simulations for DA F NE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Electron Cloud Simulations for DAFNE T. Demma INFN-LNF Thanks to K. Ohmi (KEK) Work supported in part by the “Ministero degli Affari Esteri, Direzione Generale per la Promozione e la Cooperazione Culturale”

  2. Plan of talk • Introduction • ECLOUD Simulations for the DAFNE wiggler • Secondary Emission Yield • bunch patterns • magnetic field models • ECLOUD Simulations for build up in presence of solenoidal field • Preliminary analysis of the instabilities • Conclusions

  3. Electron cloud at DAFNE • e+ current limited to 1.2 A by strong horizontal instability • Large positive tune shift with current in e+ ring, not seen in e- ring • Instability depends on bunch current • Instability strongly increases along the train • Anomalous vacuum pressure rise has been oserved in e+ ring • Instability sensitive to orbit in wiggler and bending magnets • Main change for the 2003 was wiggler field modification

  4. Wiggler vacuum chamber A. Chimenti et Al., Proc. Of PAC 93 Wiggler vacuum chamber cross section Wiggler beam chamber detail • Al alloy 5083-H321 chamber (120 mm x 20 mm ) • 10 mm slots divide the beam channel from the antechambers where absorbers and pumping stations are located • 95% of photon flux is intercepted in the antechambers

  5. Wiggler magnetic field model in ECLOUD simulations M. Preger, DAFNE Tech. Note L-34; C.Vaccarezza, PAC05, p.779 magnetic field (Bx, By, Bz) inside the wiggler as a function of x,y,z coordinates is obtained from a bi-cubic fit of the measured 2-D field-map data By (x,y=0,z); field components Bx and Bz are approximated by consistent with Maxwell’s equations:

  6. peak field ~1.7 T period ~0.65 m x=-6 cm, x= 0 cm, x= +6 cm By[T] z[m] Bz[T] Bx[T] z [m] z[m] Wiggler magnetic field

  7. Input parameters for ECLOUD (DAFNE Wiggler 2003) * As measured on Al sampels with same finishing of the actual vacuum camber N.Mahne et Al. , PAC’05

  8. Bunch patterns Nb=2.1 1010 100 bunches Lsep= 0.8 m 50 bunches Lsep= 1.6 m 33 bunches Lsep= 2.4 m 25 bunches Lsep= 3.2 m

  9. Secondary emission yield maximum (δmax) δmax=1.9 δmax =1.7 δmax =1.5 δmax =1.3 δmax =1.1 100 bunches (Nb= 2.1x1010 ; Lsep=0.8m; Ngap= 20)

  10. Electron reflectivity at 0 energy δ0 = 100 % Nb=2.1 1010 100 bunches Lsep= 0.8 m 50 bunches Lsep= 1.6 m 33 bunches Lsep= 2.4 m 25 bunches Lsep= 3.2 m

  11. Magnetic field models By[T] z[m] 100 bunches, Lsep= 0.8 m, Nb=2.1 1010 2003 wiggler2002 wiggler 2007 wiggler (proposed)

  12. Solenoids Installation • At the startup after the recent shutdown for the setup of the crab waist collision scheme the instability threshold dropped to 270mA for the positron current (feedback switched off). • Main change was the installation of new interaction regions (20 m straight sections of alluminum SEY>2) • In the attempt to find a remedy solenoids were installed in the field free regions of DAFNE, leading to an increase of the threshold to 400mA (feedback switched off).

  13. Solenoids

  14. Multipacting Suppression Nb=2.1x1010 Lsep=0.8 m R= 30 mm δmax =2.4 (10f-30e-100f) Bz=0 GBz=10 G Bz=20 G Bz=40 G Photoelecrons are produced only during the passage of the first 10 bunches.

  15. x-y Phase-Space Snapshot Bz=40 G

  16. Effects of Solenoids on Vacuum Pressure Rise (100f,20e) Lsep=0.8 m Bz= 40 G Sol. Off/Sol. On Vacuum pressure read-out vs. total current as recorded in a straight section of the positron ring where a 40 G solenoidal field was turned on (blue dots) and off (red dots).

  17. A.Drago

  18. Typical observations of coupled bunch instability • Growth rates depends on bunch current • Most unstable mode is always a slow frequency mode (-1 mode)

  19. PEI-M Tracking simulationK.Ohmi, PRE55,7550 (1997),K.Ohmi, PAC97, pp1667. Electron cloud e+bunches z y ~m x • Solve both equations of beam and electrons simultaneously, giving the transverse amplitude of each bunch as a function of time. • Fourier transformation of the amplitudes gives a spectrum of the unstable mode, identified by peaks of the betatron sidebands.

  20. Input parameters for DAFNE simulations

  21. Bunch train evolution x [m] bunch 1.2 A in 60 equispaced bunches

  22. 60 equispaced bunches Beam current 1.2 A Growth time ~ 100 turn Mode spectrum and growth rate -1 mode (60-5-1=54)

  23. e-cloud density evolution 1 turn 5 turn 10 turn 15 turn 20 turn 25 turn

  24. 120 equispaced bunches Beam current 1.2 A Growth time ~ 100 turn Mode spectrum and growth rate -1 mode (120-5-1=154)

  25. Simulations vs measurments

  26. Summary • ECLOUD build-up simulations for the DAFNE Wiggler show: • expected dependence of e-cloud build-up on SEY parameters • no dependence of e-cloud build-up on magnetic field model • Solenoids were installed at DAFNE, preliminary observation seems to confirm their effectiveness in reducing e-cloud build-up . • Coupled-bunch instability has been simulated using PEI-M for the DAFNE parameters • Preliminary results are in qualitative agreement with grow-damp measurments • Explore a wider range of beam/chamber parameters and different field regions • Compare the results with other codes (Ecloud, POSINST) • Modify the code to include ellyptical boundaries

  27. Instability growth rates Switching off the horizontal feedback for short periods, transverse grow-damp measurements have been performed to estimate the instability growth rates at different beam currents. Horizontal growth rates recorded in July 2004. (A.Drago et Al. Proceedings of PAC 2005) Nb=1.06 · 1010 (100 bunches) Nb=1.5 · 1010 (50 bunches) Nb=1.9 · 1010 (33 bunches) Nb=3.13 · 1010 (25 bunches) 1/~ 8 ms-1

  28. Bunch patterns (fixed growth rate) 100 bunches Nb=1.06 1010 Lsep= 0.8 m 50 bunches Nb=1.5 1010 Lsep= 1.6 m 33 bunches Nb=1.9 1010 Lsep= 2.4 m 25 bunches Nb=3.13 1010 Lsep= 3.2 m

  29. Cyclotron Resonance Y. Cai et Al., Phys. Rev. ST-AB 7, 024402 (2004) • Resonance condition • Intensity threshold (R=33 mm, δmax =2.4 ) (R=44 mm, δmax =1.9 )

  30. Simulated Intensity Threshold Bz=66 G; Lsep Bz=33 G; 2Lsep R=30mm δmax =2.4 Nb5x1010 for both Lsep and 2Lsep is above the DAFNE operated current.

  31. Linear theory of e-cloud induced multibunch instability[S.S. Win et al., Phys. Rev. ST-AB 8, 094401 (2005)] Under linearity and superposition assumption, the momentum kick experienced by bunch i when bunch j is displached can be written as: Coupled bunch instability is characterized by the dispersion relation: Bunches oscillate with a mode characterized by: The momentum kick can calculated numerically using the PEI-M code.

  32. Instability caused by electrons in the DAFNE arcs • Lsep= 0.8 m • bunch 400 is hor. displaced (x0=5mm) • Electron distribution • Wake force • Growth rate ~ 100 turn

  33. Wake linearity dx=5 mm dx=10 mm Linearity is satisfied up to no more than the 410th bunch

More Related