1 / 25

Relaxation of Pulsar Wind Nebula via Current-Driven Kink Instability

Investigating the relaxation process of Pulsar Wind Nebulae through a current-driven kink instability mechanism. This study explores the intricate electromagnetic fields and radiation emissions observed from these nebulae. Understand the impact of magnetization parameters on downstream shock structures and the role of obliquely rotating pulsar magnetospheres in energy transfer. Delve into the theoretical and numerical simulations to solve the magnetization dilemma and explore alternative mechanisms like the current-driven kink instability.

arlena
Download Presentation

Relaxation of Pulsar Wind Nebula via Current-Driven Kink Instability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Relaxation of Pulsar Wind Nebula via Current-Driven Kink Instability Yosuke Mizuno (水野陽介) Institute of Astronomy National Tsing-Hua University Collaborators Y. Lyubarsky (Ben-Gurion Univ), K.-I. Nishikawa (NSSTC/UAH), P. E. Hardee (Univ. of Alabama, Tuscaloosa) Mizuno et al., 2011, ApJ, 728, 90

  2. Pulsar Wind Nebulae Pulsar magnetosphere Termination Shock Pulsar wind Pulsar wind nebula electromagnetic fields Synchrotron & IC radiation • Pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe) are considered as relativistically hot bubbles continuously pumped by e+-e- plasma and magnetic field emanating from pulsar • Pulsar loses rotation energy by generating highly magnetized ultra-relativistic wind • Pulsar wind terminates at a strong reverse shock (termination shock) and shocked plasma inflates a bubble with in external medium • From shocked plasma Synchrotron and Inverse-Compton radiation are observed from radio to gamma-ray band (e.g., Gaensler & Slane 2006)

  3. Pulsar Wind Nebulae (obs.) Vela (Pavlov et al. 2001) 3C58 (Slane et al. 2004) G54.1+0.3 (Lu et al. 2002) G320.4-1.2 (Gaensler et al. 2002)

  4. Simple Spherical Model of PWNe • Close to pulsar, energy is carried mostly by electromagnetic fields as Poynting flux • Common belief: at termination shock, wind must already be very weakly magnetized • Magnetization parameter s (ratio of Poynting to kinetic energy flux) needs to be as small as 0.001-0.01 at termination shock (e.g., Rees & Gunn 1974, Kennel & Coroniti 1984) • Such low value of s is puzzling because it is not easy to invent a realistic energy conversion mechanism to reduce s to required level (s problem) (reviews by Arons 2007; Kirk et al. 2009)

  5. Dependence on s to shock downstream structure Kennel & Coroniti 1984 Postshock speed At shock downstream c/3 s>>1: effectively weak (magnetic energy dominated) s<<1: significant fraction of total energy in upstream converted to thermal energy in downstream s>>1: almost constant with relativistic speed s<<1: velocity just after shock becomes c/3 limit, then decreasing From radio observation of Crab nebula, expanding velocity is 2000km/s at 2pc (s~0.003)

  6. Axisymmetric RMHD Simulations of PWNe Del Zanna et al.( 2004) Synchrotron emission map Flow magnitude • Extensive axisymmetric RMHD simulations of PWNe show that the morphology of PWNe including jet-torus structure with s~0.01(e.g., Komissarov & Lyubarsky 2003, 2004, Del Zanna et al. 2004, 2006) • If magnetization were larger, then the nebula would be elongated by magnetic pinch effect beyond observational limits

  7. Constraining  in PWNe Smaller s, jet does not formed =0.03 =0.003 Larger s, PWNe elongates >0.01 required for Jet formation (a factor of 10 larger than within 1D spherical MHD models) =0.01 (Del Zanna et al. 2004)

  8. Obliquely rotating Pulsar magnetosphere • In pulsar wind, most of energy transferred by waves, which an obliquely rotating magnetosphereexcites near the light cylinder • In equatorial belt of wind, the sign of magnetic field alternates with pulsar period, forming stripes of opposite magnetic polarity (striped wind; Michel 1971, Bogovalov 1999) • Theoretical Modeling of pulsar wind suggest that most of wind energy is transported in equatorial belt (Bogovalov 1999; Spitkovsky 2006) • In the equatorial belt, magnetic dissipation of the striped wind would be a main energy conversion mechanism Spitkovsky (2006)

  9. Dissipation of Alternating Fields 1D RPIC simulation with σ = 45, Γ = 20 (dissipation occurs) • For simple wave decay, due to relativistic time dilation, complete dissipation could occur only on a scale comparable to or larger than radius of termination shock (Lyubarsky & Kirk 2001; Kirk & Skjaeraasen 2003) • But, alternating fields can annihilate at termination shock by strong deceleration of wind via magnetic reconnection (Petri & Lyuabrsky 2007) • After waves decay via magnetic reconnection: s < 1 (~0.1) • At quantitative level, s problem is partially solved if Poynting flux is converted into plasma energy via dissipation of oscillating part of field Petri & Lyubarsky 2007

  10. Another Possibility: CD Kink Instability in PWNe • At quantitative level, s problem is partially solved if Poynting flux is converted into plasma energy via dissipation of oscillating part of field (Petri & Lyubarsky 2007) • But, from residual magnetic field, s still cannot be as small as required (0.1~1). • Question still remains how the residual mean field s could become extremely small (0.001~0.01): need another mechanism • Begelman (1998) proposed that problem can be solved if current-driven kink instability destroys concentric field structure in pulsar wind nebula • As first step, we perform 3D evolution of simple cylindrical model of PWNe (Begelman & Li 1992) with growing CD kink instability using 3D RMHD simulation code

  11. CD Kink Instability • Well-known instability in laboratory plasma (TOKAMAK), astrophysical plasma (Sun, jet, pulsar etc). • In configurations with strong toroidal magnetic fields, current-driven (CD) kink mode (m=1) is unstable. • This instability excites large-scale helical motions that can be strongly distort or even disrupt the system • For static cylindrical force-free equilibria, well known Kurskal-Shafranov (KS) criterion • Unstable wavelengths: l > |Bp/Bf |2pR • However, rotation and shear motion could significant affect the instability criterion Schematic picture of CD kink instability 3D RMHD simulation of CD kink instability in helical force-free field (Mizuno et al. 2009)

  12. Purpose of Study • Begelman (1998) proposed that s problem can be solved if current-driven kink instability destroys concentric field structure in pulsar wind nebula • As first step, we perform 3D evolution of simple cylindrical model of PWNe (Begelman & Li 1992) with growing CD kink instability using 3D RMHD simulation code RAISHIN

  13. 3D GRMHD code RAISHIN Mizuno et al. 2006a, astro-ph/0609004 Mizuno et al. 2011, ApJ • RAISHIN dode utilizes conservative, high-resolution shock capturing schemes (Godunov-type scheme) to solve the 3D General Relativistic MHD equations (metric is static) * Reconstruction: PLM (Minmod & MC slope-limiter), CENO, PPM, WENO, MP, MPWENO, WENO-Z, WENO-M, Lim03 * Riemann solver: HLL, HLLC, HLLD approximate Riemann solver * Constrained Transport: Flux CT, Fixed Flux-CT, Upwind Flux-CT * Time evolution: Multi-step TVD Runge-Kutta method (2nd & 3rd-order) * Recovery step: Noble 2 variable method, Mignore-McKinney 1 variable method * Equation of states:constant G-law EoS, variable EoS for ideal gas Numerical Schemes

  14. Ability of RAISHIN code • Multi-dimension (1D, 2D, 3D) • Special and General relativity (static metric) • Different coordinates (RMHD: Cartesian, Cylindrical, Spherical and GRMHD: Boyer-Lindquist of non-rotating or rotating BH) • Different spatial reconstruction algorithms (10) • Different approximate Riemann solver (3) • Different constrained transport schemes (3) • Different time advance algorithms (2) • Different recovery schemes (2) • Using constant G-law and variable Equation of State (Synge-type) • Parallelized by OpenMP (shared memory) and MPI (distributed memory)

  15. Relativistic Regime • Kinetic energy >> rest-mass energy • Fluid velocity ~ light speed • Lorentz factor >> 1 • Relativistic jets/ejecta/wind/blast waves (shocks) in AGNs, GRBs, Pulsars, etc • Thermal energy >> rest-mass energy • Plasma temperature >> ion rest mass energy • p/r c2~ kBT/mc2 >> 1 • GRBs, magnetar flare?, Pulsar wind nebulae • Magnetic energy >> rest-mass energy • Magnetization parameter s>> 1 • s = Poyniting to kinetic energy ratio = B2/4pr c2g2 • Pulsars magnetosphere, Magnetars

  16. Cylindrical Model of PWNe • This model (Begelman & Li 1992): quasi-static cylindrical configuration with purely toroidal magnetic field • The plasma within cylinder is relativistically hot and hoop stress is balanced by thermal pressure • Cylinder is confined on outside by non-magnetized plasma • Linear analysis shows that such configuration is unstable with respect to CD kink instability (Begelman 1998)

  17. Initial Condition for Simulations Radial profile pressure Toroidal field • We solve 3D RMHD equations in Cartesian coordinates • We consider hydrostatic hot plasma column containing a pure toroidal magnetic field with radius R and height Lz (magnetic hoop stress is balanced by gas pressure) • At R>1, hot plasma column is surrounded by a hot static unmagnetized medium with constant gas pressure • p0=105r0c2 (relativistically hot, rc2 << pg), G=4/3 (adiabatic index) • Put small radial velocity perturbation • Computational domain: Cartesian box of size 6R x 6R x Lz (Lz=1R) with grid resolution of N/R,L=60 • Boundary: periodic in axis direction, reflecting boundary in x, y direction N: total number of modes, fk: random phase, ak:x,y,: random direction

  18. Results (2D gas prssure) Case A: perturbation N=2, fk=0, n=1 mode in x-direction, n=2 mode in y-direction Gas pressure • Initial small velocity perturbation excites CD kink instability n=1 mode in x-direction and n=2 mode in y-direction • radial velocity increases with time in linear growth phase • At about t=6R/c, CD kink instability shifts to nonlinear phase • In nonlinear phase, two modes interact and lead to turbulence in hot plasma column • Gas pressure within column, which was initially high to balance magnetic hoop stress, decreases because hoop stress weakens

  19. Results (2D magnetic field) Case A: perturbation N=2, fk=0, n=1 mode in x-direction, n=2 mode in y-direction As a result of CD kink instability, magnetic loops come apart and release magnetic stress

  20. Time Evolution of Volume Averaged Quantities Ep=rhg2-p, Em=B2/2, Et=Ep+Em • Initial slow evolution in linear growth phase lasts up to t=6R/c, and is followed by a more rapid evolution in nonlinear growth phase • In nonlinear phase, rapid decrease of magnetic energy ceases about t=11R/c • While magnetic energy declines, plasma energy increases because growth of CD kink instability leads to radial velocity increases which contributes kinetic energy magnetic energy Plasma energy Total energy • At about t=11R/c, increase in plasma energy nearly ceases and hot plasma column is almost relaxed • Multiple-mode (dashed lines) lead to more gradual interaction, slower development of turbulent structure, and later relaxation of hot plasma column

  21. Time Evolution of s Volume-averaged magnetization parameter s in hot plasma column (R<1) s=B2/rh (for hot plasma definition) • Initially, volume-averaged magnetization s =0.3 in hot plasma column • In linear growth phase, s gradually decreases • After transition to nonlinear phase, s rapidly decreases because the magnetic field strongly dissipates by the turbulent motion • When CD kink instability saturates, s~0.01

  22. Radial Profile Case A Radial profile of toroidal- and axial- averaged quantities for case A Radial field Toroidal field • In linear phase, Br & Bz grow, while Bf & pg decline gradually beginning from near the axis • In nonlinear phase, Bf & pg decrease rapidly, and Br & Bz increase throughout hot plasma column • At end of nonlinear phase (t~11R/c), all magnetic field components become comparable and field totally chaotic • In saturation phase, magnetized column begins slow radial expansion (relaxation) Gas pressure Axial field • For different initial perturbation profiles, evolutionary timescale is different but physical behavior is similar (not shown here)

  23. Discussion: Elongation of PWNe • Our simulation confirm scenario envisaged by Begelman (1998) • Toroidal magnetic loops come apart, hoop stress declines, and pressure difference across the nebula is washed out in nonlinear phase of CD kink instability • For this reason, elongation of PWNe cannot be correctly estimated by axisymmetric models • Because axisymmetric models retain a concentric toroidal magnetic field geometry • To understand the morphology of PWNe correctly, we should perform 3D RMHD simulations

  24. Discussion: Radiation • Radiation from Crab nebula is highly polarized along axis of nebula (e.g., Michel et al. 1991, Fesen et al. 1992) • It is indicated that the existence of ordered toroidal magnetic field in PWNe • From our simulation results, we see that even though instability eventually destroys toroidal magnetic field structure, magnetic field becomes completely chaotic only at the end of nonlinear stage of development • Therefore toroidal magnetic field should dominate in central part of nebula that are filled by newly injected plasma

  25. Summery • We have investigated development of CD kink instability of a hydrostatic hot plasma column containing toroidal magnetic field as a model of PWNe • CD kink instability is excited by a small initial velocity perturbation and turbulent structure develops inside the hot plasma column • At end of nonlinear phase, hot plasma column relaxes with a slow radial expansion • Magnetization sdecreases from initial valule 0.3 to 0.01 • For different initial perturbation profiles, timescale is a bit different but physical behavior is same • Therefore relaxation of a hot plasma column is independent of initial perturbation profile • Our simulation confirm the scenario envisaged by Begelman (1998)

More Related