1 / 8

Toward a High Level recommendation: why, how ?

Toward a High Level recommendation: why, how ?. Introduction to the Break out session Isabelle de Zegher March 10 th 2008. What we did already. Organizational aspects & recommendation/ projects. Legal aspects & recommendations/projects. Technical aspects & recommendations/projects.

arminda
Download Presentation

Toward a High Level recommendation: why, how ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Toward a High Level recommendation: why, how ? Introduction to the Break out session Isabelle de Zegher March 10th 2008

  2. What we did already Organizational aspects & recommendation/ projects Legal aspects & recommendations/projects Technical aspects & recommendations/projects Financial AnalysisClinical Research (Draft)

  3. What we did already What we need Organizational aspects & recommendation/ projects High Level Political Statement(Consolidated recommendation) Legal aspects & recommendations/projects Technical aspects & recommendations/projects Financial AnalysisClinical Research (final)Public Health & Mobility Financial AnalysisClinical Research (Draft)

  4. Objectives of High Level Political statement • WHAT DO WE WANT: REQUEST for widening the scope of the use of EHR and re-use of the content, • bringing together clinical research IT and clinical care IT, • with first focus on clinical research and possibility to extend on public health sector • WHY DOES THIS MAKE SENSE: SHOWING benefits of interoperable EHR for the different health care stakeholders (practitioners, hospitals, payers, pharma sector and wider public health sector) • HOW CAN THIS HAPPENSPECIFY which scenarios will allow to decrease the cost and increase speed for results

  5. Questions to be answered at plenaryfollowing discussion in break out sessions • In the current draft (presentation), do we address correctly the 3 key issues: legal, technical, organizational against the WHAT, WHY, HOW – if not, which aspects are missing • What are the key/strongest messages to pass to authorities (3 or 4 bullet) • What are barriers and practical recommendations (3 or 4 bullets) • What concretely we would expect out of political actions (as this topic is high on the agenda for many organizations like DG Sanco, WHO, …) – be concrete

  6. Chair : Petra Wilson Rapporteur : Jean Samuel Location : Room Ensor Participants :

  7. Chair : Mats Sundgren Rapporteur : Gudrun Zahlman Location : Room Rubens Participants :

  8. Chair : Peter Singleton Rapporteur: Pierre-Yves Lastic Location: RoomPauli Participants:

More Related