1 / 17

To what degree is gender embodied?

To what degree is gender embodied?. Lecture 8. outline : gendered bodies. 1. introduction: some historical and theoretical issues 2. is there a ‘natural’ body? 3. men’s bodies 4. ‘woman as body’ 5. gender: women as more than bodies 6. bringing bodies back in

arnaldo
Download Presentation

To what degree is gender embodied?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. To what degree is gender embodied? Lecture 8

  2. outline: gendered bodies 1. introduction: some historical and theoretical issues 2. is there a ‘natural’ body? 3. men’s bodies 4. ‘woman as body’ 5. gender: women as more than bodies 6. bringing bodies back in 7. doing/disciplining bodies 8. gendered bodies: final observations

  3. introduction: some historical and theoretical issues • Plato and ‘somatophobia’ (Spelman 1982: 118) • ‘Cartesian dualism’: mind/body – gendered split – men/culture and women/nature • how to understand ‘the body’? – much debate – the extent to which the body is ‘real’ and/or discursive - 3 main perspectives

  4. 3 main perspectives • body as nature – biological entity e.g. Firestone – reproductive differences; • body as socially constructed – continuum: - sex/gender distinction – socialisation theories - critique of sex/gender distinction – is the body a ‘coat - rack’? - Butler – ‘sex’ –socially constructed – what happens to the body? • embodiment – the lived body – ‘we are bodies’

  5. is there a natural body (1)?see Diana Fuss in Kemp and Squires (1997:250-258) • essentialism – ‘true essence’ • feminist theory: - ‘female essence’- pure femininity - ‘universal female oppression’ - ‘ female voice’- Irigaray - ‘feminist discourse’- category of ‘women’

  6. is there a ‘natural’ body (2)? essentialism • the ‘natural’ or real body underlies gender • ‘real’ femininity and women’s bodies are repressed or unrepresentable in patriarchy often recognise importance of the social

  7. is there a ‘natural’ body (2)? constructionism • opposed to essentialism • focuses on the social: - ‘natural’ socially produced - bodies shaped by social factors/meanings - representations of bodies change • involve essentialism?

  8. men’s bodies • men seen as disembodied - mind reigns - men can transcend their bodies - male bodies not problematic –privileged position – marginalised groups? - construction of masculinity (hegemonic) – physical bodily performance – injured? e.g. male labourers

  9. woman as body (1) • women historically associated more with nature and disordered (reproductive) bodies • de Beauvoir – ‘anatomy is not destiny’ • ‘body in trouble’ (Moi in Hughes & Witz 1997) • dualistic account of the female body – positive and negative? • ‘reproductive body’ - bodily-related crises – source of alienation?

  10. woman as body (2) • second-wave Feminism highly influenced by de Beauvoir’s argument that patriarchy shapes women’s bodies but biology does not determine women – can change • but de Beauvoir did not escape patriarchal notion of women’s bodies as repulsive • body as source of woman’s alienation (self & species) – crises • privilege gender does body slip out of view?

  11. gender: women as more than their bodies • domination of female body – source of women’s oppression? • body politics – e.g. women’s health movement • Our Bodies, Our Selves (1971) • challenge medical expert knowledge/discourses

  12. bringing bodies back in • sociology of the body – from 1980s, lots of work • Butler refutes distinction between sex and gender. • discourses have material effects. • bodies that conform to the ‘heterosexual imperative’ (boy/girl) matter and others do not • positive - allows criticism of how some bodies delegitimated • problem because bodies - especially as experienced by women – lived body - get lost under gender as fluid?

  13. doing/disciplining bodies (1) • doing gender means bodily doing (West & Zimmerman) • e.g. Iris Young – femininity and space • see also (Mauss (1973[1934]) walking • techniques of the body developed in line with disciplinary regimes - reinforce gender opposition?

  14. doing/disciplining bodies (2) • techniques involve surveillance and discipline of our bodies in effort to fit with social norms: • e.g. Brush (1998) – cosmetic surgery – ‘rhetoric of choice’ • e.g. Bordo (1993) on diet/ing • Tyler & Abbott (1998) make-up weight, • e.g. Mansfield & Mcginn in Morgan (1993) – ‘pumping irony’ • norms often unrealistic and/or contradictory • always resistance - & alternatives: women’s football; female body building?

  15. gendered bodies: final points (1) • how are bodies socially constructed? • materially - through social institutions (e.g. work, media) and social practices (e.g. ways of walking, beauty) • are men’s bodies increasingly subject to disciplinary processes previously aimed at women?

  16. gendered bodies: final points (2) • symbolically - produced by representation/ discourses? • social constructionism criticised for still assuming that there is a natural sexed body on which gendered meanings are ‘written’ • is the body a tabula rasa (blank slate)? • are women’s bodies a problem to be gone beyond or something to ‘think through’?

  17. some extra references Hughes, A & Witz, A (1997) ‘Feminism and the matter of bodies: from de Beauvoir to Butler’, Body and Society, 3(1): 47-60. Johnston, L (1996) ‘Flexing Femininity: female body-builders refiguring ‘the body’, Gender, Place and Culture, 3(3): 327-340 Martin, E (1987) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction, Milton Keynes: Open University Press Mauss, M (1973) ‘Techniques of the Body’, Economy and Society, vol 2, pp. 70-88. Spelman, E (1982) ‘Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views’, Feminist Studies, 8(1): 109-131. Stanley, L ‘Should ‘sex’ really be ‘gender’ – or ‘gender’ really be ‘sex’? In Jackson, S & Scott, S (2002) (eds.) Gender: A Sociological Reader, London: Routledge. Tyler, M & Abbott, P (1998) ‘Chocs away: weight watching in the contemporary airline industry’, Sociology, 32(3): 433-450.

More Related