1 / 24

MGTO 630B Managing People Globally for Competitive Advantage

MGTO 630B Managing People Globally for Competitive Advantage. Mergers & Acquisitions Saturday, March 8, 2003. Summary of Ferodo Turnaround. John Tharme arrived as Managing Director of FTL (spent only 2 days with Mr. Worawut, previous MD) Engineer, 30 years in SAfr. JV, few years as MD

arnon
Download Presentation

MGTO 630B Managing People Globally for Competitive Advantage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MGTO 630BManaging People Globally for Competitive Advantage Mergers & Acquisitions Saturday, March 8, 2003

  2. Summary of Ferodo Turnaround • John Tharme arrived as Managing Director of FTL (spent only 2 days with Mr. Worawut, previous MD) • Engineer, 30 years in SAfr. JV, few years as MD • Brought in by T & N management group • Found out that Peter Farrell never visited Thai factory, no strategic planning for Thai JV • Realized that Worawut was caught between being MD of FTL and being Mr. Subhawat’s friend • Had long-term view: JV would need 5 years before being profitable, need time to build up export, domestic markets

  3. What Tharme did • Provided marketing support for Boonpong – Mr. Subhawat • Cleared backlogged shipment to Ferodo, Australia • FTL bough back stocks from Boonpong, used stock to fill remaining Australian orders • Boonpong became non-exclusive distributor • David Jones brought in from South African JV to become Sales and Marketing Manager for FTL • Could sell in domestic as well as export market

  4. Ferodo (B) illustrates • Successful transfer of business practices (Mr. Worawut  Mr. Tharme)/ sales and marketing (Boonpong, Mr. Subhawat  FTL, David Jones) knowledge from local (Boonpong) to global (FTL, T & N) • Turnaround in JV performance

  5. Characteristics of Knowledge • Context specific versus context generalizable • Higher level versus lower level • Individual versus collective • Present versus future focused • Tacit versus explicit • General versus specific

  6. Keys to Successful IJVs • Choose right partner • Goals, strategy, reliability • Find right local general manager • Local networks, ministries, suppliers, markets, • Choose right location • Control the IJV • Be prepared to be patient!

  7. Alliance Takeaways • Usually short-lived entities • HRM manages interface between alliance companies and people within them • Alliances characterized by duality between cooperation and competition, leveraging and developing competencies • Common characteristic of these conflicts is knowledge acquisition and learning – must be approached strategically for these learning objectives to be realized • Most important single factor determining IJV success or failure is CHOICE OF PARTNER

  8. By the end of the M&A module, you should be able to: • Diagnose reasons for the failure and success of M&As • Develop strategy for improving success of M&A

  9. Which factors influence the integration / differentiation of HRM Practices? • Factors contributing to local isomorphism (adapt to local context: internal consistency, integration) • Sector • Market • Embeddedness in local environment • Local environment • Factors contributing to differentiation • Organizational origin • Resource flows: capital, information, people • Corporate culture

  10. HR practices that tend to be localized • Time off • Benefits • Gender composition • Training • Executive bonus • Participation

  11. Knowledge Transfer and the Role of Alliances / M&As and Culture Culture National Firm Regional Motivation and Incentives to form alliances, M&As Knowledge transfer through alliances, M&As Ability to transfer Knowledge through alliances, M&As

  12. AICC case • Does national culture and/or organizational culture influence what happened at AICC? What other factors contributed to the problems? • What are your recommendations for fixing the problems? Country rank (out of 50 for all except LTO (23)) in brackets

  13. “Ever since they tried to make us an organization, we have stopped being an enterprise” -- Ron Wheeler • Is the present situation the result of poor adaptation of AICC to the changing business environment or is it the result of the different culture imposed by Masseverk?

  14. Figure 6-1 (p. 252). Trends in International Mergers and Acquisitions Source: Mergers and Acquisitions Almanac, February 2001, p. 37.

  15. Mergers & Acquisitions: A few observations • Essential element of company growth strategy • Resource dependency and transaction cost theory support M&A activity • increase firm knowledge while minimizing transaction costs

  16. Are mergers successful? • Measured by actual business results in comparable companies, less than ½ of merged / taken-over companies successful • No direct relationship between market or share value paid for a company and success of the merger • No direct relationship between relative size of the merging businesses and success of the merger • No direct relationship between whether mergers took place in associated or different industries and success of the merger

  17. “If we buy up a company and the most important knowledge workers make off, then we have lost out already. Loyalty of our employees has a considerably higher value than in the past”. –Andy Grove, former Chairman of Knowledge-Based Company.

  18. Turnover Rate of Executives

  19. Summary: Reasons for M & A failures • Difference in vision for new entity • Loss of talent and capabilities, other intangible assets • Lack of understanding of system and processes in acquiring company • High transition and coordination costs • Lack of cultural fit

  20. Figure 6-4. The Wheel of Fortune at General Electric Source: R.N. Ashkenas, L.J. DeMonaco, and S.C. Francis, “Making the Deal Real: How GE Capital Integrates Acquisitions,” Harvard Business Review, January-February 1998, p. 167.

  21. Synergon Case • Would events have unfolded differently if the M&As had been systematically planned? • Use the GE Pathfinder model in the previous overhead to diagnose what went wrong. • Develop recommendations about how you would fix the problem.

  22. Why Mergers are Successful, part I • Effective strategic formulation of vision • Clear objectives of merger • Practical planning of phase BEFORE companies merged • Careful integration following merger Source: Booz Allen Hamilton, 1997

  23. Why mergers are successful, part II • Complete as quickly as possible (change is expected, don’t prolong the change process) • Make decisions quickly, communicate them openly • Specified schedule observed without deviation • Conflicts between partners to merger discussed openly • New company set objectives that are as ambitious as possible Sources: Daniel Vasella (1st Chairman of Novartis (formerly Sandoz and Ciba Geigy); Jurgen Schrempp (Daimler Chrysler); LSE study.

  24. M & A Takeaways • Best predictor of M & A success is previous experience with M & As • Vision and strategy for combined organization a must • Post-merger integration of culture and people consistently rank among main obstacles • HR contributes to M & A success by assessing culture and people practices to ensure retention of key personnel in both organizations • 100 day period critical: insight, information, involvement, inspiration

More Related